This document describes benchmarks available to track Chrome‘s and WebView’s memory usage, where they live, what they measure, how to run them, and on how to diagnose regressions.
System health is an effort to unify top-level benchmarks (as opposite to micro-benchmarks and regression tests) that are suitable to capture representative user stories.
System health memory benchmarks are:
These benchmarks are run continuously on the chrome.perf waterfall, collecting and reporting results on the Chrome Performance Dashboard.
System health user stories are classified by the kind of interactions they perform with the browser:
browse stories navigate to a URL and interact with the page; e.g. scroll, click on elements, navigate to subpages, navigate back.load stories just navigate to a URL and wait for the page to load.background stories navigate to a URL, possibly interact with the page, and then bring another app to the foreground (thus pushing the browser to the background).long_running stories interact with a page for a longer period of time (~5 mins).blank has a single story that just navigates to about:blank.The full name of a story has the form {interaction}:{category}:{site} where:
interaction is one the labels given above;category is used to group together sites with a similar purpose, e.g. news, social, tools;site is a short name identifying the website in which the story mostly takes place, e.g. cnn, facebook, gmail.For example browse:news:cnn and background:social:facebook are two system health user stories.
Today, for most stories a garbage collection is forced at the end of the story and a memory dump is then triggered. Metrics report the values obtained from this single measurement.

To view data from one of the benchmarks on the Chrome Performance Dashboard you should select:
{interaction}_{category} for system health stories.: replaced by _).If you are investigating a Perf dashboard alert and would like to see the details, you can click on any point of the graph. It gives you the commit range, buildbot output and a link to the trace file taken during the buildbot run. (More information about reading trace files here)

Benchmarks may be run on a local platform/device or remotely on a pinpoint try job.
Given a patch already uploaded to code review, try jobs provide a convenient way to evaluate its memory implications on devices or platforms which may not be immediately available to developers.

To start a try job go to the pinpoint website, click on the + button to create a new job, and fill in the required details:
system_health.memory_mobile or system_health.memory_desktop as appropriate.--story-filter option to only run stories that match the pattern.run_benchmark. Of note, if you are interested in running a small but representative sample of system health stories you can pass --story-tag-filter health_check.If you have more specific needs, or need to automate the creation of jobs, you can also consider using pinpoint_cli.
After building, e.g. ChromePublic.apk, you can run a specific system health story with the command:
$SRC/tools/perf/run_benchmark run system_health.memory_mobile \
--browser android-chromium --story-filter load:search:google
This will run the story with a default of 3 repetitions and produce a results.html file comparing results from this and any previous benchmark runs. In addition, you'll also get individual trace files for each story run by the benchmark. Note: by default only high level metrics are shown, you may need to tick the “Show all” check box in order to view some of the lower level memory metrics.

Other useful options for this command are:
--pageset-repeat [n] - override the default number of repetitions--reset-results - clear results from any previous benchmark runs in the results.html file.--results-label [label] - give meaningful names to your benchmark runs, this way it is easier to compare them.For WebView make sure to replace the system WebView on your device and use --browser android-webview.
There is a large number of memory-infra metrics, breaking down usage attributed to different components and processes.

Most memory metrics have the form memory:{browser}:{processes}:{source}:{component}:{kind} where:
chrome or webview.browser_process, renderer_processess, gpu_process, or all_processess.reported_by_chrome or reported_by_osskia or sqlite; details about a specific component, e.g. v8:heap; or a class of memory as seen by the OS, e.g. system_memory:native_heap or gpu_memory. If reported by chrome, the metrics are gathered by MemoryDumpProviders, probes placed in the specific components' codebase. For example, in “memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:net:effective_size_avg,” the component is “net” which is Chrome's network stack and “reported_by_chrome” means that this metric is gathered via probes in the network stack.effective_size (others are locked_size and allocated_objects_size); for metrics by the OS this usually is proportional_resident_size (others are peak_resident_size and private_dirty_size).