Web Mitigation Metrics

The web platform offers a number of tools to web developers which enable mitigation of a few important threats. In order to understand how these are being used in the wild, and evaluate our success at promulgating them, we collect some usage statistics; this document outlines those counters and points to some helpful graphs.

Content Security Policy

We believe that a carefully-crafted Content Security Policy can help protect web applications from injection attacks that would otherwise lead to script execution. Strict CSP is a reasonable approach, one which we'd like to encourage.

In order to understand CSP‘s use in the wild, we can look at a few counters that give some insight into the percentage of Chrome users’ page views that use CSP in a given way:

  • kContentSecurityPolicy (graph) tracks the overall usage of Content-Security-Policy headers. Likewise, kContentSecurityPolicyReportOnly (graph) tracks the report-only variant.

To get a feel for the general quality of policies in the wild, we want to evaluate how closely developers are hewing to the strictures of Strict CSP. We've boiled that down to three categories:

  • Does the policy reasonably restrict object-src? The only “reasonable” restriction, unfortunately, is object-src 'none'. kCSPWithReasonableObjectRestrictions and kCSPROWithReasonableObjectRestrictions track that directive value in enforced and report-only modes respectively.

  • Does the policy reasonably restrict base-uri in order to avoid malicious redirection of relative URLs? base-uri 'none' and base-uri 'self' are both appropriate, and are tracked via kCSPWithReasonableBaseRestrictions and kCSPROWithReasonableBaseRestrictions in enforced and report-only modes respectively.

  • Does the policy avoid using a list of hosts or schemes (which research has shown to be mostly ineffective at mitigating attack)? kCSPWithReasonableScriptRestrictions and kCSPROWithReasonableScriptRestrictions track the policies whose script-src directives rely upon cryptographic nonces and/or hashes rather than lists of trusted servers, and which also avoid relying upon 'unsafe-inline'.

Policies that sufficiently restrict all of the directives above (object-src, base-uri, and script-src) are tracked via kCSPWithReasonableRestrictions and kCSPROWithReasonableRestrictions. This is the baseline we'd like pages generally to meet, and a number we hope we can drive up over time.

We're also tracking a higher bar, which includes all the restrictions above, but also avoids relying upon 'strict-dynamic', via kCSPWithBetterThanReasonableRestrictions and kCSPROWithBetterThanReasonableRestrictions.

Embedded Enforcement

kIFrameCSPAttribute records the overall usage of the csp attribute on <iframe> elements, which enables pages to enforce a policy on documents they embed.

Trusted Types

Trusted Types gives page authors a means to protect their sites against cross-site scripting attacks. In order to understand real-world Trusted Types usage we obtain the following usage counts:

  • General use:kTrustedTypesEnabled, kTrustedTypesEnabledEnforcing, and kTrustedTypesEnabledReportOnly. The first tells us (relative to all page loads) how many pages have any form of Trusted Types enabled, while the other two allow us to determine which percentage of pages run in enforcing or report-only mode (or both).

  • Tracking specific features: kTrustedTypesPolicyCreated tracks creation of all Trusted Types policies, kTrustedTypesDefaultPolicyCreated notes whether a “default” policy has been created. kTrustedTypesAllowDuplicates records whether an ‘allow-duplicates’ keyword has been used.

  • Error tracking: kTrustedTypesAssignmentError tracks whether Trusted Types has blocked a string assignment.

Cross Origin Isolation policies

Cross Origin Isolation policies refer to a number of header based policies that developers can send to enforce specific rules about how their content can be embedded, opened from, etc. It is also used to gate certain APIs that would be otherwise too powerful to use in a post-Spectre world.

Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy restricts a resource to only be fetched by “same-origin” or “same-site” pages.

  • “NetworkService.CrossOriginResourcePolicy.Result” UMA histogram records the result of the CORP check.

    • “success”: The CORP check passes successfully.
    • “same-origin violation”: “same-origin” is specified on a cross-origin response.
    • “same-origin violation with COEP involvement”: No CORP header is specified but that is treated as “same-origin” because the initiator context enables Cross-Origin Embedder Policy (see below), and the response comes from cross-origin.
    • “same-site violation”: “same-site” is specified on a cross-site response.
  • “NetworkService.CrossOriginResourcePolciy.ReportOnlyResult” UMA histogram records the result of the CORP check, only when a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy-Report-Only header is attached to the initiator context. The format is same as “NetworkService.CrossOriginResourcePolicy.Result”.

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy is used to restrict the usage of window openers. Pages can choose to restrict this relation to same-origin pages with similar COOP value, same-origin unless they are opening popups or put no restriction by default.

  • Explicit values of “same-origin” and “same-origin-allow-popups” are tracked via kCrossOriginOpenerPolicySameOrigin and kCrossOriginOpenerPolicySameOriginAllowPopups respectively.

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy is used to restrict the embedding of subresources to only those that have explicitly opted in via [Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy].

  • COEP is simply “require-corp” or nothing and we track uses of the feature via kCrossOriginEmbedderPolicyRequireCorp.

Note that some APIs having precise timers or memory measurement are enabled only for pages that set COOP to “same-origin” and COEP to “require-corp”.

  • We track such pages via kCoopAndCoepIsolated.