Using third party code can save time and is consistent with our values - no need to reinvent the wheel! We put all code that isn't written by Chromium developers into
//third_party (even if you end up modifying just a few functions). We do this to make it easy to track license compliance, security patches, and supply the right credit and attributions. It also makes it a lot easier for other projects that embed our code to track what is Chromium licensed and what is covered by other licenses.
By default, all code should be checked into //third_party, for the reasons given above. Other locations are only appropriate in a few situations and need explicit approval; don‘t assume that because there’s some other directory with third_party in the name it's okay to put new things there.
To make sure the inclusion of a new third_party project makes sense for the Chromium project, you should first obtain Chrome Eng Review approval. Googlers should see go/chrome-eng-review and review existing topics in g/chrome-eng-review. Please include information about the additional checkout size, build times, and binary sizes. Please also make sure that the motivation for your project is clear, e.g., a design doc has been circulated.
There are two common ways to depend on third-party code: you can reference a Git repo directly (via entries in the DEPS file), or you can check in a snapshot. The former is preferable if you are actively developing in it or need access to the history; the latter is better if you don‘t need the full history of the repo or don’t need to pick up every single change. And, of course, if the code you need isn't in a Git repo, you have to do the latter.
If the code is in a Git repo that you want to mirror, please file an infra git ticket to get the repo mirrored onto chromium.googlesource.com; we don't allow direct dependencies on non-Google-hosted repositories, so that we can still build if an external repository goes down..
Once the mirror is set up, add an entry to //DEPS so that gclient will pull it in. If the code is only needed on some platforms, add a condition to the deps entry so that developers on other platforms don‘t pull in things they don’t need.
As for specifying the path where the library is fetched, a path like
//third_party/<project_name>/src is highly recommended so that you can put the file like OWNERS or README.chromium at
//third_party/<project_name>. If you have a wrong path in DEPS and want to change the path of the existing library in DEPS, please ask the infrastructure team before committing the change.
Lastly, add the new directory to Chromium‘s
//.gitignore, so that it won’t show up as untracked files when you run
git status on the main repository.
If you are checking in a snapshot, please describe the source in the README.chromium file, described below. For security reasons, please retrieve the code as securely as you can, using HTTPS and GPG signatures if available. If retrieving a tarball, please do not check the tarball itself into the tree, but do list the source and the SHA-512 hash (for verification) in the README.chromium and Change List. The SHA-512 hash can be computed via
openssl dgst -sha512. If retrieving from a git repository, please list the revision that the code was pulled from.
If you are checking the files in directly, you do not need an entry in DEPS and do not need to modify
_Accessible to Googlers only. Non-Googlers can email one of the people in third_party/OWNERS for help.
Your OWNERS file must include 2 Chromium developer accounts. This will ensure accountability for maintenance of the code over time. While there isn't always an ideal or obvious set of people that should go in OWNERS, this is critical for first-line triage of any issues that crop up in the code.
As an OWNER, you're expected to:
You need a README.chromium file with information about the project from which you're re-using code. See //third_party/README.chromium.template for a list of fields to include. A presubmit check will check this has the right format.
README.chromium files contain a field indicating whether the package is security-critical or not. A package is security-critical if it is compiled into the product and does any of the following:
You need a LICENSE file. Example: //third_party/libjpeg/LICENSE.
//tools/licenses.py scan; this will complain about incomplete or missing data for third_party checkins. We use
licenses.py credits to generate the about:credits page in Google Chrome builds.
If the library will never be shipped as a part of Chrome (e.g. build-time tools, testing tools), make sure to set “License File” as “NOT_SHIPPED” so that the license is not included in about:credits page (more on this below).
All third party additions and substantive changes like re-licensing need the following sign-offs. Some of these are accessible to Googlers only. Non-Googlers can email one of the people in //third_party/OWNERS for help.
Please send separate emails to the eng review and security lists.
Subsequent changes don't normally require third-party-owners or security approval; you can modify the code as much as you want. When you update code, be mindful of security-related mailing lists for the project and relevant CVE to update your package.
As we said at the beginning, it is important that Chrome displays the right credit and attributions for all of the third_party code we use.
To view this in chrome, you can open chrome://credits.
That page displays a resource embedded in the browser as part of the //components/resources/components_resources.grd GRIT file; the actual HTML text is generated in the //components/resources:about_credits build target using a template from the output of the //tools/licenses.py script. Assuming you‘ve followed the rules above to ensure that you have the proper LICENSE file and it passes the checks, it’ll be included automatically.