| #!/usr/bin/env python3 |
| # Copyright 2012 The Chromium Authors |
| # Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be |
| # found in the LICENSE file. |
| |
| import io |
| import os.path |
| import subprocess |
| import textwrap |
| import unittest |
| |
| import PRESUBMIT |
| |
| from PRESUBMIT_test_mocks import MockFile, MockAffectedFile |
| from PRESUBMIT_test_mocks import MockInputApi, MockOutputApi |
| |
| |
| _TEST_DATA_DIR = 'base/test/data/presubmit' |
| |
| |
| class VersionControlConflictsTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testTypicalConflict(self): |
| lines = [ |
| '<<<<<<< HEAD', ' base::ScopedTempDir temp_dir_;', '=======', |
| ' ScopedTempDir temp_dir_;', '>>>>>>> master' |
| ] |
| errors = PRESUBMIT._CheckForVersionControlConflictsInFile( |
| MockInputApi(), MockFile('some/path/foo_platform.cc', lines)) |
| self.assertEqual(3, len(errors)) |
| self.assertTrue('1' in errors[0]) |
| self.assertTrue('3' in errors[1]) |
| self.assertTrue('5' in errors[2]) |
| |
| def testIgnoresReadmes(self): |
| lines = [ |
| 'A First Level Header', '====================', '', |
| 'A Second Level Header', '---------------------' |
| ] |
| errors = PRESUBMIT._CheckForVersionControlConflictsInFile( |
| MockInputApi(), MockFile('some/polymer/README.md', lines)) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(errors)) |
| |
| |
| class BadExtensionsTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testBadRejFile(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile('some/path/foo.cc', ''), |
| MockFile('some/path/foo.cc.rej', ''), |
| MockFile('some/path2/bar.h.rej', ''), |
| ] |
| |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckPatchFiles(mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(results)) |
| self.assertEqual(2, len(results[0].items)) |
| self.assertTrue('foo.cc.rej' in results[0].items[0]) |
| self.assertTrue('bar.h.rej' in results[0].items[1]) |
| |
| def testBadOrigFile(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile('other/path/qux.h.orig', ''), |
| MockFile('other/path/qux.h', ''), |
| MockFile('other/path/qux.cc', ''), |
| ] |
| |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckPatchFiles(mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(results)) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(results[0].items)) |
| self.assertTrue('qux.h.orig' in results[0].items[0]) |
| |
| def testGoodFiles(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile('other/path/qux.h', ''), |
| MockFile('other/path/qux.cc', ''), |
| ] |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckPatchFiles(mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(results)) |
| |
| |
| class CheckForSuperfluousStlIncludesInHeadersTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testGoodFiles(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| # The check is not smart enough to figure out which definitions correspond |
| # to which header. |
| MockFile('other/path/foo.h', ['#include <string>', 'std::vector']), |
| # The check is not smart enough to do IWYU. |
| MockFile('other/path/bar.h', |
| ['#include "base/check.h"', 'std::vector']), |
| MockFile('other/path/qux.h', |
| ['#include "base/stl_util.h"', 'foobar']), |
| MockFile('other/path/baz.h', |
| ['#include "set/vector.h"', 'bazzab']), |
| # The check is only for header files. |
| MockFile('other/path/not_checked.cc', |
| ['#include <vector>', 'bazbaz']), |
| ] |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckForSuperfluousStlIncludesInHeaders( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(results)) |
| |
| def testBadFiles(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile('other/path/foo.h', ['#include <vector>', 'vector']), |
| MockFile( |
| 'other/path/bar.h', |
| ['#include <limits>', '#include <set>', 'no_std_namespace']), |
| ] |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckForSuperfluousStlIncludesInHeaders( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(results)) |
| self.assertTrue('foo.h: Includes STL' in results[0].message) |
| self.assertTrue('bar.h: Includes STL' in results[0].message) |
| |
| |
| class CheckSingletonInHeadersTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testSingletonInArbitraryHeader(self): |
| diff_singleton_h = [ |
| 'base::subtle::AtomicWord ' |
| 'base::Singleton<Type, Traits, DifferentiatingType>::' |
| ] |
| diff_foo_h = [ |
| '// base::Singleton<Foo> in comment.', |
| 'friend class base::Singleton<Foo>' |
| ] |
| diff_foo2_h = [' //Foo* bar = base::Singleton<Foo>::get();'] |
| diff_bad_h = ['Foo* foo = base::Singleton<Foo>::get();'] |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('base/memory/singleton.h', diff_singleton_h), |
| MockAffectedFile('foo.h', diff_foo_h), |
| MockAffectedFile('foo2.h', diff_foo2_h), |
| MockAffectedFile('bad.h', diff_bad_h) |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckSingletonInHeaders(mock_input_api, |
| MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings)) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings[0].items)) |
| self.assertEqual('error', warnings[0].type) |
| self.assertTrue('Found base::Singleton<T>' in warnings[0].message) |
| |
| def testSingletonInCC(self): |
| diff_cc = ['Foo* foo = base::Singleton<Foo>::get();'] |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [MockAffectedFile('some/path/foo.cc', diff_cc)] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckSingletonInHeaders(mock_input_api, |
| MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings)) |
| |
| |
| class DeprecatedOSMacroNamesTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testDeprecatedOSMacroNames(self): |
| lines = [ |
| '#if defined(OS_WIN)', ' #elif defined(OS_WINDOW)', |
| ' # if defined(OS_MAC) || defined(OS_CHROME)' |
| ] |
| errors = PRESUBMIT._CheckForDeprecatedOSMacrosInFile( |
| MockInputApi(), MockFile('some/path/foo_platform.cc', lines)) |
| self.assertEqual(len(lines) + 1, len(errors)) |
| self.assertTrue( |
| ':1: defined(OS_WIN) -> BUILDFLAG(IS_WIN)' in errors[0]) |
| |
| |
| class InvalidIfDefinedMacroNamesTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testInvalidIfDefinedMacroNames(self): |
| lines = [ |
| '#if defined(TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR)', |
| '#if !defined(TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR)', |
| '#elif defined(TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR)', |
| '#ifdef TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR', |
| ' # ifdef TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR', |
| '# if defined(VALID) || defined(TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR)', |
| '# else // defined(TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR)', |
| '#endif // defined(TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR)' |
| ] |
| errors = PRESUBMIT._CheckForInvalidIfDefinedMacrosInFile( |
| MockInputApi(), MockFile('some/path/source.mm', lines)) |
| self.assertEqual(len(lines), len(errors)) |
| |
| def testValidIfDefinedMacroNames(self): |
| lines = [ |
| '#if defined(FOO)', '#ifdef BAR', '#if TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR' |
| ] |
| errors = PRESUBMIT._CheckForInvalidIfDefinedMacrosInFile( |
| MockInputApi(), MockFile('some/path/source.cc', lines)) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(errors)) |
| |
| |
| class CheckNoUNIT_TESTInSourceFilesTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testUnitTestMacros(self): |
| lines = [ |
| '#if defined(UNIT_TEST)', '#if defined UNIT_TEST', |
| '#if !defined(UNIT_TEST)', '#elif defined(UNIT_TEST)', |
| '#ifdef UNIT_TEST', ' # ifdef UNIT_TEST', '#ifndef UNIT_TEST', |
| '# if defined(VALID) || defined(UNIT_TEST)', |
| '# if defined(UNIT_TEST) && defined(VALID)', |
| '# else // defined(UNIT_TEST)', '#endif // defined(UNIT_TEST)' |
| ] |
| errors = PRESUBMIT._CheckNoUNIT_TESTInSourceFiles( |
| MockInputApi(), MockFile('some/path/source.cc', lines)) |
| self.assertEqual(len(lines), len(errors)) |
| |
| def testNotUnitTestMacros(self): |
| lines = [ |
| '// Comment about "#if defined(UNIT_TEST)"', |
| '/* Comment about #if defined(UNIT_TEST)" */', |
| '#ifndef UNIT_TEST_H', '#define UNIT_TEST_H', |
| '#ifndef TEST_UNIT_TEST', '#define TEST_UNIT_TEST', |
| '#if defined(_UNIT_TEST)', '#if defined(UNIT_TEST_)', |
| '#ifdef _UNIT_TEST', '#ifdef UNIT_TEST_', '#ifndef _UNIT_TEST', |
| '#ifndef UNIT_TEST_' |
| ] |
| errors = PRESUBMIT._CheckNoUNIT_TESTInSourceFiles( |
| MockInputApi(), MockFile('some/path/source.cc', lines)) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(errors)) |
| |
| |
| class CheckEachPerfettoTestDataFileHasDepsEntry(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testNewSha256FileNoDEPS(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile('base/tracing/test/data_sha256/new.pftrace.sha256', []), |
| ] |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckEachPerfettoTestDataFileHasDepsEntry( |
| input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| ('You must update the DEPS file when you update a .sha256 file ' |
| 'in base/tracing/test/data_sha256'), results[0].message) |
| |
| def testNewSha256FileSuccess(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| new_deps = """deps = { |
| 'src/base/tracing/test/data': { |
| 'bucket': 'perfetto', |
| 'objects': [ |
| { |
| 'object_name': 'test_data/new.pftrace-a1b2c3f4', |
| 'sha256sum': 'a1b2c3f4', |
| 'size_bytes': 1, |
| 'generation': 1, |
| 'output_file': 'new.pftrace' |
| }, |
| ], |
| 'dep_type': 'gcs' |
| }, |
| }""".splitlines() |
| input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile('base/tracing/test/data_sha256/new.pftrace.sha256', |
| ['a1b2c3f4']), |
| MockFile('DEPS', new_deps, |
| ["deps={'src/base/tracing/test/data':{}}"]), |
| ] |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckEachPerfettoTestDataFileHasDepsEntry( |
| input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(results)) |
| |
| def testNewSha256FileWrongSha256(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| new_deps = """deps = { |
| 'src/base/tracing/test/data': { |
| 'bucket': 'perfetto', |
| 'objects': [ |
| { |
| 'object_name': 'test_data/new.pftrace-a1b2c3f4', |
| 'sha256sum': 'wrong_hash', |
| 'size_bytes': 1, |
| 'generation': 1, |
| 'output_file': 'new.pftrace' |
| }, |
| ], |
| 'dep_type': 'gcs' |
| }, |
| }""".splitlines() |
| f = MockFile('base/tracing/test/data_sha256/new.pftrace.sha256', |
| ['a1b2c3f4']) |
| input_api.files = [ |
| f, |
| MockFile('DEPS', new_deps, |
| ["deps={'src/base/tracing/test/data':{}}"]), |
| ] |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckEachPerfettoTestDataFileHasDepsEntry( |
| input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| ('No corresponding DEPS entry found for %s. ' |
| 'Run `base/tracing/test/test_data.py get_deps --filepath %s` ' |
| 'to generate the DEPS entry.' % (f.LocalPath(), f.LocalPath())), |
| results[0].message) |
| |
| def testDeleteSha256File(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| old_deps = """deps = { |
| 'src/base/tracing/test/data': { |
| 'bucket': 'perfetto', |
| 'objects': [ |
| { |
| 'object_name': 'test_data/new.pftrace-a1b2c3f4', |
| 'sha256sum': 'a1b2c3f4', |
| 'size_bytes': 1, |
| 'generation': 1, |
| 'output_file': 'new.pftrace' |
| }, |
| ], |
| 'dep_type': 'gcs' |
| }, |
| }""".splitlines() |
| f = MockFile('base/tracing/test/data_sha256/new.pftrace.sha256', [], |
| ['a1b2c3f4'], |
| action='D') |
| input_api.files = [ |
| f, |
| MockFile('DEPS', old_deps, old_deps), |
| ] |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckEachPerfettoTestDataFileHasDepsEntry( |
| input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(( |
| 'You deleted %s so you must also remove the corresponding DEPS entry.' |
| % f.LocalPath()), results[0].message) |
| |
| def testDeleteSha256Success(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| new_deps = """deps = { |
| 'src/base/tracing/test/data': { |
| 'bucket': 'perfetto', |
| 'objects': [], |
| 'dep_type': 'gcs' |
| }, |
| }""".splitlines() |
| old_deps = """deps = { |
| 'src/base/tracing/test/data': { |
| 'bucket': 'perfetto', |
| 'objects': [ |
| { |
| 'object_name': 'test_data/new.pftrace-a1b2c3f4', |
| 'sha256sum': 'a1b2c3f4', |
| 'size_bytes': 1, |
| 'generation': 1, |
| 'output_file': 'new.pftrace' |
| }, |
| ], |
| 'dep_type': 'gcs' |
| }, |
| }""".splitlines() |
| f = MockFile('base/tracing/test/data_sha256/new.pftrace.sha256', [], |
| ['a1b2c3f4'], |
| action='D') |
| input_api.files = [ |
| f, |
| MockFile('DEPS', new_deps, old_deps), |
| ] |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckEachPerfettoTestDataFileHasDepsEntry( |
| input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(results)) |
| |
| |
| class CheckAddedDepsHaveTestApprovalsTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def calculate(self, old_include_rules, old_specific_include_rules, |
| new_include_rules, new_specific_include_rules): |
| return PRESUBMIT._CalculateAddedDeps( |
| os.path, 'include_rules = %r\nspecific_include_rules = %r' % |
| (old_include_rules, old_specific_include_rules), |
| 'include_rules = %r\nspecific_include_rules = %r' % |
| (new_include_rules, new_specific_include_rules)) |
| |
| def testCalculateAddedDeps(self): |
| old_include_rules = [ |
| '+base', |
| '-chrome', |
| '+content', |
| '-grit', |
| '-grit/",', |
| '+jni/fooblat.h', |
| '!sandbox', |
| ] |
| old_specific_include_rules = { |
| 'compositor\.*': { |
| '+cc', |
| }, |
| } |
| |
| new_include_rules = [ |
| '-ash', |
| '+base', |
| '+chrome', |
| '+components', |
| '+content', |
| '+grit', |
| '+grit/generated_resources.h",', |
| '+grit/",', |
| '+jni/fooblat.h', |
| '+policy', |
| '+' + os.path.join('third_party', 'WebKit'), |
| ] |
| new_specific_include_rules = { |
| 'compositor\.*': { |
| '+cc', |
| }, |
| 'widget\.*': { |
| '+gpu', |
| }, |
| } |
| |
| expected = set([ |
| os.path.join('chrome', 'DEPS'), |
| os.path.join('gpu', 'DEPS'), |
| os.path.join('components', 'DEPS'), |
| os.path.join('policy', 'DEPS'), |
| os.path.join('third_party', 'WebKit', 'DEPS'), |
| ]) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| expected, |
| self.calculate(old_include_rules, old_specific_include_rules, |
| new_include_rules, new_specific_include_rules)) |
| |
| def testCalculateAddedDepsIgnoresPermutations(self): |
| old_include_rules = [ |
| '+base', |
| '+chrome', |
| ] |
| new_include_rules = [ |
| '+chrome', |
| '+base', |
| ] |
| self.assertEqual( |
| set(), self.calculate(old_include_rules, {}, new_include_rules, |
| {})) |
| |
| class FakeOwnersClient(object): |
| APPROVED = "APPROVED" |
| PENDING = "PENDING" |
| returns = {} |
| |
| def ListOwners(self, *args, **kwargs): |
| return self.returns.get(self.ListOwners.__name__, "") |
| |
| def mockListOwners(self, owners): |
| self.returns[self.ListOwners.__name__] = owners |
| |
| def GetFilesApprovalStatus(self, *args, **kwargs): |
| return self.returns.get(self.GetFilesApprovalStatus.__name__, {}) |
| |
| def mockGetFilesApprovalStatus(self, status): |
| self.returns[self.GetFilesApprovalStatus.__name__] = status |
| |
| def SuggestOwners(self, *args, **kwargs): |
| return ["eng1", "eng2", "eng3"] |
| |
| class fakeGerrit(object): |
| |
| def IsOwnersOverrideApproved(self, issue): |
| return False |
| |
| def setUp(self): |
| self.input_api = input_api = MockInputApi() |
| input_api.environ = {} |
| input_api.owners_client = self.FakeOwnersClient() |
| input_api.gerrit = self.fakeGerrit() |
| input_api.change.issue = 123 |
| self.mockOwnersAndReviewers("owner", set(["reviewer"])) |
| self.mockListSubmodules([]) |
| |
| def mockOwnersAndReviewers(self, owner, reviewers): |
| |
| def mock(*args, **kwargs): |
| return [owner, reviewers] |
| |
| self.input_api.canned_checks.GetCodereviewOwnerAndReviewers = mock |
| |
| def mockListSubmodules(self, paths): |
| |
| def mock(*args, **kwargs): |
| return paths |
| |
| self.input_api.ListSubmodules = mock |
| |
| def testApprovedAdditionalDep(self): |
| old_deps = """include_rules = []""".splitlines() |
| new_deps = """include_rules = ["+v8/123"]""".splitlines() |
| self.input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile("pdf/DEPS", new_deps, old_deps) |
| ] |
| |
| # mark the additional dep as approved. |
| os_path = self.input_api.os_path |
| self.input_api.owners_client.mockGetFilesApprovalStatus( |
| {os_path.join('v8/123', 'DEPS'): self.FakeOwnersClient.APPROVED}) |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckAddedDepsHaveTargetApprovals( |
| self.input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| # Then, the check should pass. |
| self.assertEqual([], results) |
| |
| def testUnapprovedAdditionalDep(self): |
| old_deps = """include_rules = []""".splitlines() |
| new_deps = """include_rules = ["+v8/123"]""".splitlines() |
| self.input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('pdf/DEPS', new_deps, old_deps), |
| ] |
| |
| # pending. |
| os_path = self.input_api.os_path |
| self.input_api.owners_client.mockGetFilesApprovalStatus( |
| {os_path.join('v8/123', 'DEPS'): self.FakeOwnersClient.PENDING}) |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckAddedDepsHaveTargetApprovals( |
| self.input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| # the check should fail |
| self.assertIn('You need LGTM', results[0].message) |
| self.assertIn('+v8/123', results[0].message) |
| |
| # unless the added dep is from a submodule. |
| self.mockListSubmodules(['v8']) |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckAddedDepsHaveTargetApprovals( |
| self.input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual([], results) |
| |
| |
| class JSONParsingTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testSuccess(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| filename = 'valid_json.json' |
| contents = [ |
| '// This is a comment.', '{', ' "key1": ["value1", "value2"],', |
| ' "key2": 3 // This is an inline comment.', '}' |
| ] |
| input_api.files = [MockFile(filename, contents)] |
| self.assertEqual(None, |
| PRESUBMIT._GetJSONParseError(input_api, filename)) |
| |
| def testFailure(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| test_data = [ |
| ('invalid_json_1.json', ['{ x }'], 'Expecting property name'), |
| ('invalid_json_2.json', ['// Hello world!', '{ "hello": "world }'], |
| 'Unterminated string starting at:'), |
| ('invalid_json_3.json', ['{ "a": "b", "c": "d", }'], |
| 'Expecting property name'), |
| ('invalid_json_4.json', ['{ "a": "b" "c": "d" }'], |
| "Expecting ',' delimiter:"), |
| ] |
| |
| input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile(filename, contents) |
| for (filename, contents, _) in test_data |
| ] |
| |
| for (filename, _, expected_error) in test_data: |
| actual_error = PRESUBMIT._GetJSONParseError(input_api, filename) |
| self.assertTrue( |
| expected_error in str(actual_error), |
| "'%s' not found in '%s'" % (expected_error, actual_error)) |
| |
| def testNoEatComments(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| file_with_comments = 'file_with_comments.json' |
| contents_with_comments = [ |
| '// This is a comment.', '{', ' "key1": ["value1", "value2"],', |
| ' "key2": 3 // This is an inline comment.', '}' |
| ] |
| file_without_comments = 'file_without_comments.json' |
| contents_without_comments = [ |
| '{', ' "key1": ["value1", "value2"],', ' "key2": 3', '}' |
| ] |
| input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile(file_with_comments, contents_with_comments), |
| MockFile(file_without_comments, contents_without_comments) |
| ] |
| |
| self.assertNotEqual( |
| None, |
| str( |
| PRESUBMIT._GetJSONParseError(input_api, |
| file_with_comments, |
| eat_comments=False))) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| None, |
| PRESUBMIT._GetJSONParseError(input_api, |
| file_without_comments, |
| eat_comments=False)) |
| |
| |
| class IDLParsingTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testSuccess(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| filename = 'valid_idl_basics.idl' |
| contents = [ |
| '// Tests a valid IDL file.', 'namespace idl_basics {', |
| ' enum EnumType {', ' name1,', ' name2', ' };', '', |
| ' dictionary MyType1 {', ' DOMString a;', ' };', '', |
| ' callback Callback1 = void();', |
| ' callback Callback2 = void(long x);', |
| ' callback Callback3 = void(MyType1 arg);', |
| ' callback Callback4 = void(EnumType type);', '', |
| ' interface Functions {', ' static void function1();', |
| ' static void function2(long x);', |
| ' static void function3(MyType1 arg);', |
| ' static void function4(Callback1 cb);', |
| ' static void function5(Callback2 cb);', |
| ' static void function6(Callback3 cb);', |
| ' static void function7(Callback4 cb);', ' };', '', |
| ' interface Events {', ' static void onFoo1();', |
| ' static void onFoo2(long x);', |
| ' static void onFoo2(MyType1 arg);', |
| ' static void onFoo3(EnumType type);', ' };', '};' |
| ] |
| input_api.files = [MockFile(filename, contents)] |
| self.assertEqual(None, |
| PRESUBMIT._GetIDLParseError(input_api, filename)) |
| |
| def testFailure(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| test_data = [ |
| ('invalid_idl_1.idl', [ |
| '//', 'namespace test {', ' dictionary {', ' DOMString s;', |
| ' };', '};' |
| ], 'Unexpected "{" after keyword "dictionary".\n'), |
| # TODO(yoz): Disabled because it causes the IDL parser to hang. |
| # See crbug.com/363830. |
| # ('invalid_idl_2.idl', |
| # (['namespace test {', |
| # ' dictionary MissingSemicolon {', |
| # ' DOMString a', |
| # ' DOMString b;', |
| # ' };', |
| # '};'], |
| # 'Unexpected symbol DOMString after symbol a.'), |
| ('invalid_idl_3.idl', [ |
| '//', 'namespace test {', ' enum MissingComma {', ' name1', |
| ' name2', ' };', '};' |
| ], 'Unexpected symbol name2 after symbol name1.'), |
| ('invalid_idl_4.idl', [ |
| '//', 'namespace test {', ' enum TrailingComma {', |
| ' name1,', ' name2,', ' };', '};' |
| ], 'Trailing comma in block.'), |
| ('invalid_idl_5.idl', |
| ['//', 'namespace test {', ' callback Callback1 = void(;', |
| '};'], 'Unexpected ";" after "(".'), |
| ('invalid_idl_6.idl', [ |
| '//', 'namespace test {', |
| ' callback Callback1 = void(long );', '};' |
| ], 'Unexpected ")" after symbol long.'), |
| ('invalid_idl_7.idl', [ |
| '//', 'namespace test {', ' interace Events {', |
| ' static void onFoo1();', ' };', '};' |
| ], 'Unexpected symbol Events after symbol interace.'), |
| ('invalid_idl_8.idl', [ |
| '//', 'namespace test {', ' interface NotEvent {', |
| ' static void onFoo1();', ' };', '};' |
| ], 'Did not process Interface Interface(NotEvent)'), |
| ('invalid_idl_9.idl', [ |
| '//', 'namespace test {', ' interface {', |
| ' static void function1();', ' };', '};' |
| ], 'Interface missing name.'), |
| ] |
| |
| input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile(filename, contents) |
| for (filename, contents, _) in test_data |
| ] |
| |
| for (filename, _, expected_error) in test_data: |
| actual_error = PRESUBMIT._GetIDLParseError(input_api, filename) |
| self.assertTrue( |
| expected_error in str(actual_error), |
| "'%s' not found in '%s'" % (expected_error, actual_error)) |
| |
| |
| class UserMetricsActionTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testUserMetricsActionInActions(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| file_with_user_action = 'file_with_user_action.cc' |
| contents_with_user_action = ['base::UserMetricsAction("AboutChrome")'] |
| |
| input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile(file_with_user_action, contents_with_user_action) |
| ] |
| |
| self.assertEqual([], |
| PRESUBMIT.CheckUserActionUpdate( |
| input_api, MockOutputApi())) |
| |
| def testUserMetricsActionNotAddedToActions(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| file_with_user_action = 'file_with_user_action.cc' |
| contents_with_user_action = [ |
| 'base::UserMetricsAction("NotInActionsXml")' |
| ] |
| |
| input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile(file_with_user_action, contents_with_user_action) |
| ] |
| |
| output = PRESUBMIT.CheckUserActionUpdate(input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| ('File %s line %d: %s is missing in ' |
| 'tools/metrics/actions/actions.xml. Please run ' |
| 'tools/metrics/actions/extract_actions.py to update.' % |
| (file_with_user_action, 1, 'NotInActionsXml')), output[0].message) |
| |
| def testUserMetricsActionInTestFile(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| file_with_user_action = 'file_with_user_action_unittest.cc' |
| contents_with_user_action = [ |
| 'base::UserMetricsAction("NotInActionsXml")' |
| ] |
| |
| input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile(file_with_user_action, contents_with_user_action) |
| ] |
| |
| self.assertEqual([], |
| PRESUBMIT.CheckUserActionUpdate( |
| input_api, MockOutputApi())) |
| |
| |
| class PydepsNeedsUpdatingTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| class MockPopen: |
| |
| def __init__(self, stdout): |
| self.stdout = io.StringIO(stdout) |
| |
| def wait(self): |
| return 0 |
| |
| class MockSubprocess: |
| CalledProcessError = subprocess.CalledProcessError |
| PIPE = 0 |
| |
| def __init__(self): |
| self._popen_func = None |
| |
| def SetPopenCallback(self, func): |
| self._popen_func = func |
| |
| def Popen(self, cmd, *args, **kwargs): |
| return PydepsNeedsUpdatingTest.MockPopen(self._popen_func(cmd)) |
| |
| def _MockParseGclientArgs(self, is_android=True): |
| return lambda: {'checkout_android': 'true' if is_android else 'false'} |
| |
| def setUp(self): |
| mock_all_pydeps = ['A.pydeps', 'B.pydeps', 'D.pydeps'] |
| self.old_ALL_PYDEPS_FILES = PRESUBMIT._ALL_PYDEPS_FILES |
| PRESUBMIT._ALL_PYDEPS_FILES = mock_all_pydeps |
| mock_android_pydeps = ['D.pydeps'] |
| self.old_ANDROID_SPECIFIC_PYDEPS_FILES = ( |
| PRESUBMIT._ANDROID_SPECIFIC_PYDEPS_FILES) |
| PRESUBMIT._ANDROID_SPECIFIC_PYDEPS_FILES = mock_android_pydeps |
| self.old_ParseGclientArgs = PRESUBMIT._ParseGclientArgs |
| PRESUBMIT._ParseGclientArgs = self._MockParseGclientArgs() |
| self.mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| self.mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| self.mock_input_api.subprocess = PydepsNeedsUpdatingTest.MockSubprocess( |
| ) |
| self.checker = PRESUBMIT.PydepsChecker(self.mock_input_api, |
| mock_all_pydeps) |
| self.checker._file_cache = { |
| 'A.pydeps': |
| '# Generated by:\n# CMD --output A.pydeps A\nA.py\nC.py\n', |
| 'B.pydeps': |
| '# Generated by:\n# CMD --output B.pydeps B\nB.py\nC.py\n', |
| 'D.pydeps': '# Generated by:\n# CMD --output D.pydeps D\nD.py\n', |
| } |
| |
| def tearDown(self): |
| PRESUBMIT._ALL_PYDEPS_FILES = self.old_ALL_PYDEPS_FILES |
| PRESUBMIT._ANDROID_SPECIFIC_PYDEPS_FILES = ( |
| self.old_ANDROID_SPECIFIC_PYDEPS_FILES) |
| PRESUBMIT._ParseGclientArgs = self.old_ParseGclientArgs |
| |
| def _RunCheck(self): |
| return PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating( |
| self.mock_input_api, |
| self.mock_output_api, |
| checker_for_tests=self.checker) |
| |
| def testAddedPydep(self): |
| # PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating is only implemented for Linux. |
| if not self.mock_input_api.platform.startswith('linux'): |
| return [] |
| |
| self.mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('new.pydeps', [], action='A'), |
| ] |
| |
| self.mock_input_api.CreateMockFileInPath([ |
| x.LocalPath() |
| for x in self.mock_input_api.AffectedFiles(include_deletes=True) |
| ]) |
| results = self._RunCheck() |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(results)) |
| self.assertIn('PYDEPS_FILES', str(results[0])) |
| |
| def testPydepNotInSrc(self): |
| self.mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('new.pydeps', [], action='A'), |
| ] |
| self.mock_input_api.CreateMockFileInPath([]) |
| results = self._RunCheck() |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(results)) |
| |
| def testRemovedPydep(self): |
| # PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating is only implemented for Linux. |
| if not self.mock_input_api.platform.startswith('linux'): |
| return [] |
| |
| self.mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile(PRESUBMIT._ALL_PYDEPS_FILES[0], [], action='D'), |
| ] |
| self.mock_input_api.CreateMockFileInPath([ |
| x.LocalPath() |
| for x in self.mock_input_api.AffectedFiles(include_deletes=True) |
| ]) |
| results = self._RunCheck() |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(results)) |
| self.assertIn('PYDEPS_FILES', str(results[0])) |
| |
| def testRandomPyIgnored(self): |
| # PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating is only implemented for Linux. |
| if not self.mock_input_api.platform.startswith('linux'): |
| return [] |
| |
| self.mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('random.py', []), |
| ] |
| |
| results = self._RunCheck() |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(results), 'Unexpected results: %r' % results) |
| |
| def testRelevantPyNoChange(self): |
| # PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating is only implemented for Linux. |
| if not self.mock_input_api.platform.startswith('linux'): |
| return [] |
| |
| self.mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('A.py', []), |
| ] |
| |
| def popen_callback(cmd): |
| self.assertEqual('CMD --output A.pydeps A --output ""', cmd) |
| return self.checker._file_cache['A.pydeps'] |
| |
| self.mock_input_api.subprocess.SetPopenCallback(popen_callback) |
| |
| results = self._RunCheck() |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(results), 'Unexpected results: %r' % results) |
| |
| def testRelevantPyOneChange(self): |
| # PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating is only implemented for Linux. |
| if not self.mock_input_api.platform.startswith('linux'): |
| return [] |
| |
| self.mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('A.py', []), |
| ] |
| |
| def popen_callback(cmd): |
| self.assertEqual('CMD --output A.pydeps A --output ""', cmd) |
| return 'changed data' |
| |
| self.mock_input_api.subprocess.SetPopenCallback(popen_callback) |
| |
| results = self._RunCheck() |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(results)) |
| # Check that --output "" is not included. |
| self.assertNotIn('""', str(results[0])) |
| self.assertIn('File is stale', str(results[0])) |
| |
| def testRelevantPyTwoChanges(self): |
| # PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating is only implemented for Linux. |
| if not self.mock_input_api.platform.startswith('linux'): |
| return [] |
| |
| self.mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('C.py', []), |
| ] |
| |
| def popen_callback(cmd): |
| return 'changed data' |
| |
| self.mock_input_api.subprocess.SetPopenCallback(popen_callback) |
| |
| results = self._RunCheck() |
| self.assertEqual(2, len(results)) |
| self.assertIn('File is stale', str(results[0])) |
| self.assertIn('File is stale', str(results[1])) |
| |
| def testRelevantAndroidPyInNonAndroidCheckout(self): |
| # PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating is only implemented for Linux. |
| if not self.mock_input_api.platform.startswith('linux'): |
| return [] |
| |
| self.mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('D.py', []), |
| ] |
| |
| def popen_callback(cmd): |
| self.assertEqual('CMD --output D.pydeps D --output ""', cmd) |
| return 'changed data' |
| |
| self.mock_input_api.subprocess.SetPopenCallback(popen_callback) |
| PRESUBMIT._ParseGclientArgs = self._MockParseGclientArgs( |
| is_android=False) |
| |
| results = self._RunCheck() |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(results)) |
| self.assertIn('Android', str(results[0])) |
| self.assertIn('D.pydeps', str(results[0])) |
| |
| def testGnPathsAndMissingOutputFlag(self): |
| # PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating is only implemented for Linux. |
| if not self.mock_input_api.platform.startswith('linux'): |
| return [] |
| |
| self.checker._file_cache = { |
| 'A.pydeps': |
| '# Generated by:\n# CMD --gn-paths A\n//A.py\n//C.py\n', |
| 'B.pydeps': |
| '# Generated by:\n# CMD --gn-paths B\n//B.py\n//C.py\n', |
| 'D.pydeps': '# Generated by:\n# CMD --gn-paths D\n//D.py\n', |
| } |
| |
| self.mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('A.py', []), |
| ] |
| |
| def popen_callback(cmd): |
| self.assertEqual('CMD --gn-paths A --output A.pydeps --output ""', |
| cmd) |
| return 'changed data' |
| |
| self.mock_input_api.subprocess.SetPopenCallback(popen_callback) |
| |
| results = self._RunCheck() |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(results)) |
| self.assertIn('File is stale', str(results[0])) |
| |
| |
| class IncludeGuardTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testIncludeGuardChecks(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('content/browser/thing/foo.h', [ |
| '// Comment', |
| '#ifndef CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_FOO_H_', |
| '#define CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_FOO_H_', |
| 'struct McBoatFace;', |
| '#endif // CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_FOO_H_', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('content/browser/thing/bar.h', [ |
| '#ifndef CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_BAR_H_', |
| '#define CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_BAR_H_', |
| 'namespace content {', |
| '#endif // CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_BAR_H_', |
| '} // namespace content', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('content/browser/test1.h', [ |
| 'namespace content {', |
| '} // namespace content', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('content\\browser\\win.h', [ |
| '#ifndef CONTENT_BROWSER_WIN_H_', |
| '#define CONTENT_BROWSER_WIN_H_', |
| 'struct McBoatFace;', |
| '#endif // CONTENT_BROWSER_WIN_H_', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('content/browser/test2.h', [ |
| '// Comment', |
| '#ifndef CONTENT_BROWSER_TEST2_H_', |
| 'struct McBoatFace;', |
| '#endif // CONTENT_BROWSER_TEST2_H_', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('content/browser/internal.h', [ |
| '// Comment', |
| '#ifndef CONTENT_BROWSER_INTERNAL_H_', |
| '#define CONTENT_BROWSER_INTERNAL_H_', |
| '// Comment', |
| '#ifndef INTERNAL_CONTENT_BROWSER_INTERNAL_H_', |
| '#define INTERNAL_CONTENT_BROWSER_INTERNAL_H_', |
| 'namespace internal {', |
| '} // namespace internal', |
| '#endif // INTERNAL_CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_BAR_H_', |
| 'namespace content {', |
| '} // namespace content', |
| '#endif // CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_BAR_H_', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('content/browser/thing/foo.cc', [ |
| '// This is a non-header.', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('content/browser/disabled.h', [ |
| '// no-include-guard-because-multiply-included', |
| 'struct McBoatFace;', |
| ]), |
| # New files don't allow misspelled include guards. |
| MockAffectedFile('content/browser/spleling.h', [ |
| '#ifndef CONTENT_BROWSER_SPLLEING_H_', |
| '#define CONTENT_BROWSER_SPLLEING_H_', |
| 'struct McBoatFace;', |
| '#endif // CONTENT_BROWSER_SPLLEING_H_', |
| ]), |
| # New files don't allow + in include guards. |
| MockAffectedFile('content/browser/foo+bar.h', [ |
| '#ifndef CONTENT_BROWSER_FOO+BAR_H_', |
| '#define CONTENT_BROWSER_FOO+BAR_H_', |
| 'struct McBoatFace;', |
| '#endif // CONTENT_BROWSER_FOO+BAR_H_', |
| ]), |
| # Old files allow misspelled include guards (for now). |
| MockAffectedFile('chrome/old.h', [ |
| '// New contents', |
| '#ifndef CHROME_ODL_H_', |
| '#define CHROME_ODL_H_', |
| '#endif // CHROME_ODL_H_', |
| ], [ |
| '// Old contents', |
| '#ifndef CHROME_ODL_H_', |
| '#define CHROME_ODL_H_', |
| '#endif // CHROME_ODL_H_', |
| ], |
| action='M'), |
| # Using a Blink style include guard outside Blink is wrong. |
| MockAffectedFile('content/NotInBlink.h', [ |
| '#ifndef NotInBlink_h', |
| '#define NotInBlink_h', |
| 'struct McBoatFace;', |
| '#endif // NotInBlink_h', |
| ]), |
| # Using a Blink style include guard in Blink is no longer ok. |
| MockAffectedFile('third_party/blink/InBlink.h', [ |
| '#ifndef InBlink_h', |
| '#define InBlink_h', |
| 'struct McBoatFace;', |
| '#endif // InBlink_h', |
| ]), |
| # Using a bad include guard in Blink is not ok. |
| MockAffectedFile('third_party/blink/AlsoInBlink.h', [ |
| '#ifndef WrongInBlink_h', |
| '#define WrongInBlink_h', |
| 'struct McBoatFace;', |
| '#endif // WrongInBlink_h', |
| ]), |
| # Using a bad include guard in Blink is not supposed to be accepted even |
| # if it's an old file. However the current presubmit has accepted this |
| # for a while. |
| MockAffectedFile('third_party/blink/StillInBlink.h', [ |
| '// New contents', |
| '#ifndef AcceptedInBlink_h', |
| '#define AcceptedInBlink_h', |
| 'struct McBoatFace;', |
| '#endif // AcceptedInBlink_h', |
| ], [ |
| '// Old contents', |
| '#ifndef AcceptedInBlink_h', |
| '#define AcceptedInBlink_h', |
| 'struct McBoatFace;', |
| '#endif // AcceptedInBlink_h', |
| ], |
| action='M'), |
| # Using a non-Chromium include guard in third_party |
| # (outside blink) is accepted. |
| MockAffectedFile('third_party/foo/some_file.h', [ |
| '#ifndef REQUIRED_RPCNDR_H_', |
| '#define REQUIRED_RPCNDR_H_', |
| 'struct SomeFileFoo;', |
| '#endif // REQUIRED_RPCNDR_H_', |
| ]), |
| # Not having proper include guard in *_message_generator.h |
| # for old IPC messages is allowed. |
| MockAffectedFile('content/common/content_message_generator.h', [ |
| '#undef CONTENT_COMMON_FOO_MESSAGES_H_', |
| '#include "content/common/foo_messages.h"', |
| '#ifndef CONTENT_COMMON_FOO_MESSAGES_H_', |
| '#error "Failed to include content/common/foo_messages.h"', |
| '#endif', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('chrome/renderer/thing/qux.h', [ |
| '// Comment', |
| '#ifndef CHROME_RENDERER_THING_QUX_H_', |
| '#define CHROME_RENDERER_THING_QUX_H_', |
| 'struct Boaty;', |
| '#endif', |
| ]), |
| ] |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckForIncludeGuards(mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| expected_fail_count = 10 |
| self.assertEqual( |
| expected_fail_count, len(msgs), 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % |
| (expected_fail_count, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| self.assertEqual(msgs[0].items, ['content/browser/thing/bar.h']) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| msgs[0].message, 'Include guard CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_BAR_H_ ' |
| 'not covering the whole file') |
| |
| self.assertIn('content/browser/test1.h', msgs[1].message) |
| self.assertIn('Recommended name: CONTENT_BROWSER_TEST1_H_', |
| msgs[1].message) |
| |
| self.assertEqual(msgs[2].items, ['content/browser/test2.h:3']) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| msgs[2].message, 'Missing "#define CONTENT_BROWSER_TEST2_H_" for ' |
| 'include guard') |
| |
| self.assertIn('content/browser/internal.h', msgs[3].message) |
| self.assertIn( |
| 'Recommended #endif comment: // CONTENT_BROWSER_INTERNAL_H_', |
| msgs[3].message) |
| |
| self.assertEqual(msgs[4].items, ['content/browser/spleling.h:1']) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| msgs[4].message, 'Header using the wrong include guard name ' |
| 'CONTENT_BROWSER_SPLLEING_H_') |
| |
| self.assertIn('content/browser/foo+bar.h', msgs[5].message) |
| self.assertIn('Recommended name: CONTENT_BROWSER_FOO_BAR_H_', |
| msgs[5].message) |
| |
| self.assertEqual(msgs[6].items, ['content/NotInBlink.h:1']) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| msgs[6].message, 'Header using the wrong include guard name ' |
| 'NotInBlink_h') |
| |
| self.assertEqual(msgs[7].items, ['third_party/blink/InBlink.h:1']) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| msgs[7].message, 'Header using the wrong include guard name ' |
| 'InBlink_h') |
| |
| self.assertEqual(msgs[8].items, ['third_party/blink/AlsoInBlink.h:1']) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| msgs[8].message, 'Header using the wrong include guard name ' |
| 'WrongInBlink_h') |
| |
| self.assertIn('chrome/renderer/thing/qux.h', msgs[9].message) |
| self.assertIn( |
| 'Recommended #endif comment: // CHROME_RENDERER_THING_QUX_H_', |
| msgs[9].message) |
| |
| |
| class AccessibilityRelnotesFieldTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testRelnotesPresent(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('ui/accessibility/foo.bar', ['']) |
| ] |
| mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: 'Commit description' |
| mock_input_api.change.footers['AX-Relnotes'] = [ |
| 'Important user facing change' |
| ] |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityRelnotesField( |
| mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 0, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| def testRelnotesMissingFromAccessibilityChange(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('some/file', ['']), |
| MockAffectedFile('ui/accessibility/foo.bar', ['']), |
| MockAffectedFile('some/other/file', ['']) |
| ] |
| mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: 'Commit description' |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityRelnotesField( |
| mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 1, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (1, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| self.assertTrue( |
| "Missing 'AX-Relnotes:' field" in msgs[0].message, |
| 'Missing AX-Relnotes field message not found in errors') |
| |
| # The relnotes footer is not required for changes which do not touch any |
| # accessibility directories. |
| def testIgnoresNonAccessibilityCode(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('some/file', ['']), |
| MockAffectedFile('some/other/file', ['']) |
| ] |
| mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: 'Commit description' |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityRelnotesField( |
| mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 0, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| # Test that our presubmit correctly raises an error for a set of known paths. |
| def testExpectedPaths(self): |
| filesToTest = [ |
| "chrome/browser/accessibility/foo.py", |
| "chrome/browser/ash/arc/accessibility/foo.cc", |
| "chrome/browser/ui/views/accessibility/foo.h", |
| "chrome/browser/extensions/api/automation/foo.h", |
| "chrome/browser/extensions/api/automation_internal/foo.cc", |
| "chrome/renderer/extensions/accessibility_foo.h", |
| "chrome/tests/data/accessibility/foo.html", |
| "content/browser/accessibility/foo.cc", |
| "content/renderer/accessibility/foo.h", |
| "content/tests/data/accessibility/foo.cc", |
| "extensions/renderer/api/automation/foo.h", |
| "ui/accessibility/foo/bar/baz.cc", |
| "ui/views/accessibility/foo/bar/baz.h", |
| ] |
| |
| for testFile in filesToTest: |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [MockAffectedFile(testFile, [''])] |
| mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: 'Commit description' |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityRelnotesField( |
| mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 1, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s, for file %s' % |
| (1, len(msgs), msgs, testFile)) |
| self.assertTrue( |
| "Missing 'AX-Relnotes:' field" in msgs[0].message, |
| ('Missing AX-Relnotes field message not found in errors ' |
| ' for file %s' % (testFile))) |
| |
| # Test that AX-Relnotes field can appear in the commit description (as long |
| # as it appears at the beginning of a line). |
| def testRelnotesInCommitDescription(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('ui/accessibility/foo.bar', ['']), |
| ] |
| mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: ( |
| 'Description:\n' + |
| 'AX-Relnotes: solves all accessibility issues forever') |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityRelnotesField( |
| mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 0, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| # Test that we don't match AX-Relnotes if it appears in the middle of a line. |
| def testRelnotesMustAppearAtBeginningOfLine(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('ui/accessibility/foo.bar', ['']), |
| ] |
| mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: ( |
| 'Description:\n' + |
| 'This change has no AX-Relnotes: we should print a warning') |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityRelnotesField( |
| mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertTrue( |
| "Missing 'AX-Relnotes:' field" in msgs[0].message, |
| 'Missing AX-Relnotes field message not found in errors') |
| |
| # Tests that the AX-Relnotes field can be lowercase and use a '=' in place |
| # of a ':'. |
| def testRelnotesLowercaseWithEqualSign(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('ui/accessibility/foo.bar', ['']), |
| ] |
| mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: ( |
| 'Description:\n' + |
| 'ax-relnotes= this is a valid format for accessibility relnotes') |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityRelnotesField( |
| mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 0, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| |
| class AccessibilityEventsTestsAreIncludedForAndroidTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| # Test that no warning is raised when the Android file is also modified. |
| def testAndroidChangeIncluded(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| 'content/test/data/accessibility/event/foo-expected-mac.txt', |
| [''], |
| action='A'), |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| 'accessibility/WebContentsAccessibilityEventsTest.java', [''], |
| action='M') |
| ] |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityEventsTestsAreIncludedForAndroid( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 0, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| # Test that Android change is not required when no html file is added/removed. |
| def testIgnoreNonHtmlFiles(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('content/test/data/accessibility/event/foo.txt', |
| [''], |
| action='A'), |
| MockAffectedFile('content/test/data/accessibility/event/foo.cc', |
| [''], |
| action='A'), |
| MockAffectedFile('content/test/data/accessibility/event/foo.h', |
| [''], |
| action='A'), |
| MockAffectedFile('content/test/data/accessibility/event/foo.py', |
| [''], |
| action='A') |
| ] |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityEventsTestsAreIncludedForAndroid( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 0, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| # Test that Android change is not required for unrelated html files. |
| def testIgnoreNonRelatedHtmlFiles(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('content/test/data/accessibility/aria/foo.html', |
| [''], |
| action='A'), |
| MockAffectedFile('content/test/data/accessibility/html/foo.html', |
| [''], |
| action='A'), |
| MockAffectedFile('chrome/tests/data/accessibility/foo.html', [''], |
| action='A') |
| ] |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityEventsTestsAreIncludedForAndroid( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 0, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| # Test that only modifying an html file will not trigger the warning. |
| def testIgnoreModifiedFiles(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| 'content/test/data/accessibility/event/foo-expected-win.txt', |
| [''], |
| action='M') |
| ] |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityEventsTestsAreIncludedForAndroid( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 0, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| |
| class AccessibilityTreeTestsAreIncludedForAndroidTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| # Test that no warning is raised when the Android file is also modified. |
| def testAndroidChangeIncluded(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('content/test/data/accessibility/aria/foo.html', |
| [''], |
| action='A'), |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| 'accessibility/WebContentsAccessibilityTreeTest.java', [''], |
| action='M') |
| ] |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityTreeTestsAreIncludedForAndroid( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 0, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| # Test that no warning is raised when the Android file is also modified. |
| def testAndroidChangeIncludedManyFiles(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| 'content/test/data/accessibility/accname/foo.html', [''], |
| action='A'), |
| MockAffectedFile('content/test/data/accessibility/aria/foo.html', |
| [''], |
| action='A'), |
| MockAffectedFile('content/test/data/accessibility/css/foo.html', |
| [''], |
| action='A'), |
| MockAffectedFile('content/test/data/accessibility/html/foo.html', |
| [''], |
| action='A'), |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| 'accessibility/WebContentsAccessibilityTreeTest.java', [''], |
| action='M') |
| ] |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityTreeTestsAreIncludedForAndroid( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 0, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| # Test that a warning is raised when the Android file is not modified. |
| def testAndroidChangeMissing(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| 'content/test/data/accessibility/aria/foo-expected-win.txt', |
| [''], |
| action='A'), |
| ] |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityTreeTestsAreIncludedForAndroid( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 1, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (1, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| # Test that Android change is not required when no platform expectations files are changed. |
| def testAndroidChangNotMissing(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('content/test/data/accessibility/accname/foo.txt', |
| [''], |
| action='A'), |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| 'content/test/data/accessibility/html/foo-expected-blink.txt', |
| [''], |
| action='A'), |
| MockAffectedFile('content/test/data/accessibility/html/foo.html', |
| [''], |
| action='A'), |
| MockAffectedFile('content/test/data/accessibility/aria/foo.cc', |
| [''], |
| action='A'), |
| MockAffectedFile('content/test/data/accessibility/css/foo.h', [''], |
| action='A'), |
| MockAffectedFile('content/test/data/accessibility/tree/foo.py', |
| [''], |
| action='A') |
| ] |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityTreeTestsAreIncludedForAndroid( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 0, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| # Test that Android change is not required for unrelated html files. |
| def testIgnoreNonRelatedHtmlFiles(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('content/test/data/accessibility/event/foo.html', |
| [''], |
| action='A'), |
| ] |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityTreeTestsAreIncludedForAndroid( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 0, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| # Test that only modifying an html file will not trigger the warning. |
| def testIgnoreModifiedFiles(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('content/test/data/accessibility/aria/foo.html', |
| [''], |
| action='M') |
| ] |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityTreeTestsAreIncludedForAndroid( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 0, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| |
| class AndroidDeprecatedTestAnnotationTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testCheckAndroidTestAnnotationUsage(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('LalaLand.java', ['random stuff']), |
| MockAffectedFile('CorrectUsage.java', [ |
| 'import androidx.test.filters.LargeTest;', |
| 'import androidx.test.filters.MediumTest;', |
| 'import androidx.test.filters.SmallTest;', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('UsedDeprecatedLargeTestAnnotation.java', [ |
| 'import android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.LargeTest;', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('UsedDeprecatedMediumTestAnnotation.java', [ |
| 'import android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.MediumTest;', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('UsedDeprecatedSmallTestAnnotation.java', [ |
| 'import android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.SmallTest;', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('UsedDeprecatedSmokeAnnotation.java', [ |
| 'import android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Smoke;', |
| ]) |
| ] |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT._CheckAndroidTestAnnotationUsage( |
| mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 1, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (1, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 4, len(msgs[0].items), 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % |
| (4, len(msgs[0].items), msgs[0].items)) |
| self.assertTrue( |
| 'UsedDeprecatedLargeTestAnnotation.java:1' in msgs[0].items, |
| 'UsedDeprecatedLargeTestAnnotation not found in errors') |
| self.assertTrue( |
| 'UsedDeprecatedMediumTestAnnotation.java:1' in msgs[0].items, |
| 'UsedDeprecatedMediumTestAnnotation not found in errors') |
| self.assertTrue( |
| 'UsedDeprecatedSmallTestAnnotation.java:1' in msgs[0].items, |
| 'UsedDeprecatedSmallTestAnnotation not found in errors') |
| self.assertTrue( |
| 'UsedDeprecatedSmokeAnnotation.java:1' in msgs[0].items, |
| 'UsedDeprecatedSmokeAnnotation not found in errors') |
| |
| |
| class AndroidBannedImportTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testCheckAndroidNoBannedImports(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| test_files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('RandomStufff.java', ['random stuff']), |
| MockAffectedFile('NoBannedImports.java', [ |
| 'import androidx.test.filters.LargeTest;', |
| 'import androidx.test.filters.MediumTest;', |
| 'import androidx.test.filters.SmallTest;', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('BannedUri.java', [ |
| 'import java.net.URI;', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('BannedTargetApi.java', [ |
| 'import android.annotation.TargetApi;', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('BannedUiThreadTestRule.java', [ |
| 'import androidx.test.rule.UiThreadTestRule;', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('BannedUiThreadTest.java', [ |
| 'import androidx.test.annotation.UiThreadTest;', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('BannedActivityTestRule.java', [ |
| 'import androidx.test.rule.ActivityTestRule;', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('BannedVectorDrawableCompat.java', [ |
| 'import androidx.vectordrawable.graphics.drawable.VectorDrawableCompat;', |
| ]) |
| ] |
| msgs = [] |
| for file in test_files: |
| mock_input_api.files = [file] |
| msgs.append( |
| PRESUBMIT._CheckAndroidNoBannedImports(mock_input_api, |
| mock_output_api)) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(msgs[0])) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(msgs[1])) |
| self.assertTrue(msgs[2][0].message.startswith( |
| textwrap.dedent("""\ |
| Banned imports were used. |
| BannedUri.java:1:"""))) |
| self.assertTrue(msgs[3][0].message.startswith( |
| textwrap.dedent("""\ |
| Banned imports were used. |
| BannedTargetApi.java:1:"""))) |
| self.assertTrue(msgs[4][0].message.startswith( |
| textwrap.dedent("""\ |
| Banned imports were used. |
| BannedUiThreadTestRule.java:1:"""))) |
| self.assertTrue(msgs[5][0].message.startswith( |
| textwrap.dedent("""\ |
| Banned imports were used. |
| BannedUiThreadTest.java:1:"""))) |
| self.assertTrue(msgs[6][0].message.startswith( |
| textwrap.dedent("""\ |
| Banned imports were used. |
| BannedActivityTestRule.java:1:"""))) |
| self.assertTrue(msgs[7][0].message.startswith( |
| textwrap.dedent("""\ |
| Banned imports were used. |
| BannedVectorDrawableCompat.java:1:"""))) |
| |
| |
| class CheckNoDownstreamDepsTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testInvalidDepFromUpstream(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('BUILD.gn', |
| ['deps = [', ' "//clank/target:test",', ']']), |
| MockAffectedFile('chrome/android/BUILD.gn', |
| ['deps = [ "//clank/target:test" ]']), |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| 'chrome/chrome_java_deps.gni', |
| ['java_deps = [', ' "//clank/target:test",', ']']), |
| ] |
| mock_input_api.change.RepositoryRoot = lambda: 'chromium/src' |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoUpstreamDepsOnClank(mock_input_api, |
| mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 1, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (1, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 3, len(msgs[0].items), 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % |
| (3, len(msgs[0].items), msgs[0].items)) |
| self.assertTrue(any('BUILD.gn:2' in item for item in msgs[0].items), |
| 'BUILD.gn not found in errors') |
| self.assertTrue( |
| any('chrome/android/BUILD.gn:1' in item for item in msgs[0].items), |
| 'chrome/android/BUILD.gn:1 not found in errors') |
| self.assertTrue( |
| any('chrome/chrome_java_deps.gni:2' in item |
| for item in msgs[0].items), |
| 'chrome/chrome_java_deps.gni:2 not found in errors') |
| |
| def testAllowsComments(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('BUILD.gn', [ |
| '# real implementation in //clank/target:test', |
| ]), |
| ] |
| mock_input_api.change.RepositoryRoot = lambda: 'chromium/src' |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoUpstreamDepsOnClank(mock_input_api, |
| mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 0, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| def testOnlyChecksBuildFiles(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('README.md', |
| ['DEPS = [ "//clank/target:test" ]']), |
| MockAffectedFile('chrome/android/java/file.java', |
| ['//clank/ only function']), |
| ] |
| mock_input_api.change.RepositoryRoot = lambda: 'chromium/src' |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoUpstreamDepsOnClank(mock_input_api, |
| mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 0, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| def testValidDepFromDownstream(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('BUILD.gn', |
| ['DEPS = [', ' "//clank/target:test",', ']']), |
| MockAffectedFile('java/BUILD.gn', |
| ['DEPS = [ "//clank/target:test" ]']), |
| ] |
| mock_input_api.change.RepositoryRoot = lambda: 'chromium/src/clank' |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoUpstreamDepsOnClank(mock_input_api, |
| mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 0, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| |
| class AndroidDebuggableBuildTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testCheckAndroidDebuggableBuild(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('RandomStuff.java', ['random stuff']), |
| MockAffectedFile('CorrectUsage.java', [ |
| 'import org.chromium.base.BuildInfo;', |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'boolean isOsDebuggable = BuildInfo.isDebugAndroid();', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('JustCheckUserdebugBuild.java', [ |
| 'import android.os.Build;', |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'boolean isOsDebuggable = Build.TYPE.equals("userdebug")', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('JustCheckEngineeringBuild.java', [ |
| 'import android.os.Build;', |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'boolean isOsDebuggable = "eng".equals(Build.TYPE)', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('UsedBuildType.java', [ |
| 'import android.os.Build;', |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'boolean isOsDebuggable = Build.TYPE.equals("userdebug")' |
| '|| "eng".equals(Build.TYPE)', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('UsedExplicitBuildType.java', [ |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'boolean isOsDebuggable = android.os.Build.TYPE.equals("userdebug")' |
| '|| "eng".equals(android.os.Build.TYPE)', |
| ]), |
| ] |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT._CheckAndroidDebuggableBuild(mock_input_api, |
| mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 1, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (1, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 4, len(msgs[0].items), 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % |
| (4, len(msgs[0].items), msgs[0].items)) |
| self.assertTrue('JustCheckUserdebugBuild.java:3' in msgs[0].items) |
| self.assertTrue('JustCheckEngineeringBuild.java:3' in msgs[0].items) |
| self.assertTrue('UsedBuildType.java:3' in msgs[0].items) |
| self.assertTrue('UsedExplicitBuildType.java:2' in msgs[0].items) |
| |
| |
| class LogUsageTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testCheckAndroidCrLogUsage(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('RandomStuff.java', ['random stuff']), |
| MockAffectedFile('HasAndroidLog.java', [ |
| 'import android.util.Log;', |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'Log.d("TAG", "foo");', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('HasExplicitUtilLog.java', [ |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'android.util.Log.d("TAG", "foo");', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('IsInBasePackage.java', [ |
| 'package org.chromium.base;', |
| 'private static final String TAG = "cr_Foo";', |
| 'Log.d(TAG, "foo");', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('IsInBasePackageButImportsLog.java', [ |
| 'package org.chromium.base;', |
| 'import android.util.Log;', |
| 'private static final String TAG = "cr_Foo";', |
| 'Log.d(TAG, "foo");', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('HasBothLog.java', [ |
| 'import org.chromium.base.Log;', |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'private static final String TAG = "cr_Foo";', |
| 'Log.d(TAG, "foo");', |
| 'android.util.Log.d("TAG", "foo");', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('HasCorrectTag.java', [ |
| 'import org.chromium.base.Log;', |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'private static final String TAG = "cr_Foo";', |
| 'Log.d(TAG, "foo");', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('HasOldTag.java', [ |
| 'import org.chromium.base.Log;', |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'private static final String TAG = "cr.Foo";', |
| 'Log.d(TAG, "foo");', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('HasDottedTag.java', [ |
| 'import org.chromium.base.Log;', |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'private static final String TAG = "cr_foo.bar";', |
| 'Log.d(TAG, "foo");', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('HasDottedTagPublic.java', [ |
| 'import org.chromium.base.Log;', |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'public static final String TAG = "cr_foo.bar";', |
| 'Log.d(TAG, "foo");', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('HasNoTagDecl.java', [ |
| 'import org.chromium.base.Log;', |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'Log.d(TAG, "foo");', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('HasIncorrectTagDecl.java', [ |
| 'import org.chromium.base.Log;', |
| 'private static final String TAHG = "cr_Foo";', |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'Log.d(TAG, "foo");', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('HasInlineTag.java', [ |
| 'import org.chromium.base.Log;', |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'private static final String TAG = "cr_Foo";', |
| 'Log.d("TAG", "foo");', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('HasInlineTagWithSpace.java', [ |
| 'import org.chromium.base.Log;', |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'private static final String TAG = "cr_Foo";', |
| 'Log.d("log message", "foo");', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('HasUnprefixedTag.java', [ |
| 'import org.chromium.base.Log;', |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'private static final String TAG = "rubbish";', |
| 'Log.d(TAG, "foo");', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('HasTooLongTag.java', [ |
| 'import org.chromium.base.Log;', |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'private static final String TAG = "21_characters_long___";', |
| 'Log.d(TAG, "foo");', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('HasTooLongTagWithNoLogCallsInDiff.java', [ |
| 'import org.chromium.base.Log;', |
| 'some random stuff', |
| 'private static final String TAG = "21_characters_long___";', |
| ]), |
| ] |
| |
| msgs = PRESUBMIT._CheckAndroidCrLogUsage(mock_input_api, |
| mock_output_api) |
| |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 5, len(msgs), |
| 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (5, len(msgs), msgs)) |
| |
| # Declaration format |
| nb = len(msgs[0].items) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 2, nb, 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (2, nb, msgs[0].items)) |
| self.assertTrue('HasNoTagDecl.java' in msgs[0].items) |
| self.assertTrue('HasIncorrectTagDecl.java' in msgs[0].items) |
| |
| # Tag length |
| nb = len(msgs[1].items) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 2, nb, 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (2, nb, msgs[1].items)) |
| self.assertTrue('HasTooLongTag.java' in msgs[1].items) |
| self.assertTrue( |
| 'HasTooLongTagWithNoLogCallsInDiff.java' in msgs[1].items) |
| |
| # Tag must be a variable named TAG |
| nb = len(msgs[2].items) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 3, nb, 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (3, nb, msgs[2].items)) |
| self.assertTrue('HasBothLog.java:5' in msgs[2].items) |
| self.assertTrue('HasInlineTag.java:4' in msgs[2].items) |
| self.assertTrue('HasInlineTagWithSpace.java:4' in msgs[2].items) |
| |
| # Util Log usage |
| nb = len(msgs[3].items) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 3, nb, 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (3, nb, msgs[3].items)) |
| self.assertTrue('HasAndroidLog.java:3' in msgs[3].items) |
| self.assertTrue('HasExplicitUtilLog.java:2' in msgs[3].items) |
| self.assertTrue('IsInBasePackageButImportsLog.java:4' in msgs[3].items) |
| |
| # Tag must not contain |
| nb = len(msgs[4].items) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 3, nb, 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (2, nb, msgs[4].items)) |
| self.assertTrue('HasDottedTag.java' in msgs[4].items) |
| self.assertTrue('HasDottedTagPublic.java' in msgs[4].items) |
| self.assertTrue('HasOldTag.java' in msgs[4].items) |
| |
| |
| class GoogleAnswerUrlFormatTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testCatchAnswerUrlId(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile('somewhere/file.cc', [ |
| 'char* host = ' |
| ' "https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/123456";' |
| ]), |
| MockFile('somewhere_else/file.cc', [ |
| 'char* host = ' |
| ' "https://support.google.com/chrome/a/answer/123456";' |
| ]), |
| ] |
| |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckGoogleSupportAnswerUrlOnUpload( |
| input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings)) |
| self.assertEqual(2, len(warnings[0].items)) |
| |
| def testAllowAnswerUrlParam(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile('somewhere/file.cc', [ |
| 'char* host = ' |
| ' "https://support.google.com/chrome/?p=cpn_crash_reports";' |
| ]), |
| ] |
| |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckGoogleSupportAnswerUrlOnUpload( |
| input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings)) |
| |
| |
| class HardcodedGoogleHostsTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testWarnOnAssignedLiterals(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile('content/file.cc', |
| ['char* host = "https://www.google.com";']), |
| MockFile('content/file.cc', |
| ['char* host = "https://www.googleapis.com";']), |
| MockFile('content/file.cc', |
| ['char* host = "https://clients1.google.com";']), |
| ] |
| |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckHardcodedGoogleHostsInLowerLayers( |
| input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings)) |
| self.assertEqual(3, len(warnings[0].items)) |
| |
| def testAllowInComment(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile('content/file.cc', |
| ['char* host = "https://www.aol.com"; // google.com']) |
| ] |
| |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckHardcodedGoogleHostsInLowerLayers( |
| input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings)) |
| |
| |
| class ChromeOsSyncedPrefRegistrationTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testWarnsOnChromeOsDirectories(self): |
| files = [ |
| MockFile('ash/file.cc', ['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']), |
| MockFile('chrome/browser/chromeos/file.cc', |
| ['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']), |
| MockFile('chromeos/file.cc', |
| ['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']), |
| MockFile('components/arc/file.cc', |
| ['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']), |
| MockFile('components/exo/file.cc', |
| ['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']), |
| ] |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| for file in files: |
| input_api.files = [file] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckChromeOsSyncedPrefRegistration( |
| input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings)) |
| |
| def testDoesNotWarnOnSyncOsPref(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile('chromeos/file.cc', |
| ['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_OS_PREF']), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckChromeOsSyncedPrefRegistration( |
| input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings)) |
| |
| def testDoesNotWarnOnOtherDirectories(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile('chrome/browser/ui/file.cc', |
| ['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']), |
| MockFile('components/sync/file.cc', |
| ['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']), |
| MockFile('content/browser/file.cc', |
| ['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']), |
| MockFile('a/notchromeos/file.cc', |
| ['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckChromeOsSyncedPrefRegistration( |
| input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings)) |
| |
| def testSeparateWarningForPriorityPrefs(self): |
| input_api = MockInputApi() |
| input_api.files = [ |
| MockFile('chromeos/file.cc', [ |
| 'PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF', |
| 'PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PRIORITY_PREF' |
| ]), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckChromeOsSyncedPrefRegistration( |
| input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(2, len(warnings)) |
| |
| |
| class ForwardDeclarationTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testCheckHeadersOnlyOutsideThirdParty(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('somewhere/file.cc', ['class DummyClass;']), |
| MockAffectedFile('third_party/header.h', ['class DummyClass;']) |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckUselessForwardDeclarations( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings)) |
| |
| def testNoNestedDeclaration(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('somewhere/header.h', [ |
| 'class SomeClass {', ' protected:', ' class NotAMatch;', '};' |
| ]) |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckUselessForwardDeclarations( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings)) |
| |
| def testSubStrings(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('somewhere/header.h', [ |
| 'class NotUsefulClass;', 'struct SomeStruct;', |
| 'UsefulClass *p1;', 'SomeStructPtr *p2;' |
| ]) |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckUselessForwardDeclarations( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(2, len(warnings)) |
| |
| def testUselessForwardDeclaration(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('somewhere/header.h', [ |
| 'class DummyClass;', 'struct DummyStruct;', |
| 'class UsefulClass;', 'std::unique_ptr<UsefulClass> p;' |
| ]) |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckUselessForwardDeclarations( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(2, len(warnings)) |
| |
| def testBlinkHeaders(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('third_party/blink/header.h', [ |
| 'class DummyClass;', |
| 'struct DummyStruct;', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('third_party\\blink\\header.h', [ |
| 'class DummyClass;', |
| 'struct DummyStruct;', |
| ]) |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckUselessForwardDeclarations( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(4, len(warnings)) |
| |
| |
| class RelativeIncludesTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testThirdPartyNotWebKitIgnored(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('third_party/test.cpp', '#include "../header.h"'), |
| MockAffectedFile('third_party/test/test.cpp', |
| '#include "../header.h"'), |
| ] |
| |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForRelativeIncludes(mock_input_api, |
| mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(errors)) |
| |
| def testNonCppFileIgnored(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('test.py', '#include "../header.h"'), |
| ] |
| |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForRelativeIncludes(mock_input_api, |
| mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(errors)) |
| |
| def testInnocuousChangesAllowed(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('test.cpp', '#include "header.h"'), |
| MockAffectedFile('test2.cpp', '../'), |
| ] |
| |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForRelativeIncludes(mock_input_api, |
| mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(errors)) |
| |
| def testRelativeIncludeNonWebKitProducesError(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('test.cpp', ['#include "../header.h"']), |
| ] |
| |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForRelativeIncludes(mock_input_api, |
| mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(errors)) |
| |
| def testRelativeIncludeWebKitProducesError(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('third_party/blink/test.cpp', |
| ['#include "../header.h']), |
| ] |
| |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForRelativeIncludes(mock_input_api, |
| mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(errors)) |
| |
| |
| class CCIncludeTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testThirdPartyNotBlinkIgnored(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('third_party/test.cpp', '#include "file.cc"'), |
| ] |
| |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForCcIncludes(mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(errors)) |
| |
| def testPythonFileIgnored(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('test.py', '#include "file.cc"'), |
| ] |
| |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForCcIncludes(mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(errors)) |
| |
| def testIncFilesAccepted(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('test.py', '#include "file.inc"'), |
| ] |
| |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForCcIncludes(mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(errors)) |
| |
| def testInnocuousChangesAllowed(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('test.cpp', '#include "header.h"'), |
| MockAffectedFile('test2.cpp', 'Something "file.cc"'), |
| ] |
| |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForCcIncludes(mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(errors)) |
| |
| def testCcIncludeNonBlinkProducesError(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('test.cpp', ['#include "file.cc"']), |
| ] |
| |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForCcIncludes(mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(errors)) |
| |
| def testCppIncludeBlinkProducesError(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('third_party/blink/test.cpp', |
| ['#include "foo/file.cpp"']), |
| ] |
| |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForCcIncludes(mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(errors)) |
| |
| |
| class GnGlobForwardTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testAddBareGlobs(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.gni', |
| ['forward_variables_from(invoker, "*")']), |
| MockAffectedFile('base/BUILD.gn', |
| ['forward_variables_from(invoker, "*")']), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckGnGlobForward(mock_input_api, |
| MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings)) |
| msg = '\n'.join(warnings[0].items) |
| self.assertIn('base/stuff.gni', msg) |
| # Should not check .gn files. Local templates don't need to care about |
| # visibility / testonly. |
| self.assertNotIn('base/BUILD.gn', msg) |
| |
| def testValidUses(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.gni', |
| ['forward_variables_from(invoker, "*", [])']), |
| MockAffectedFile('base/stuff2.gni', [ |
| 'forward_variables_from(invoker, "*", TESTONLY_AND_VISIBILITY)' |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| 'base/stuff3.gni', |
| ['forward_variables_from(invoker, [ "testonly" ])']), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckGnGlobForward(mock_input_api, |
| MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual([], warnings) |
| |
| |
| class GnRebasePathTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testAddAbsolutePath(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('base/BUILD.gn', |
| ['rebase_path("$target_gen_dir", "//")']), |
| MockAffectedFile('base/root/BUILD.gn', |
| ['rebase_path("$target_gen_dir", "/")']), |
| MockAffectedFile('base/variable/BUILD.gn', |
| ['rebase_path(target_gen_dir, "/")']), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckGnRebasePath(mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings)) |
| msg = '\n'.join(warnings[0].items) |
| self.assertIn('base/BUILD.gn', msg) |
| self.assertIn('base/root/BUILD.gn', msg) |
| self.assertIn('base/variable/BUILD.gn', msg) |
| self.assertEqual(3, len(warnings[0].items)) |
| |
| def testValidUses(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| 'base/foo/BUILD.gn', |
| ['rebase_path("$target_gen_dir", root_build_dir)']), |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| 'base/bar/BUILD.gn', |
| ['rebase_path("$target_gen_dir", root_build_dir, "/")']), |
| MockAffectedFile('base/baz/BUILD.gn', |
| ['rebase_path(target_gen_dir, root_build_dir)']), |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| 'base/baz/BUILD.gn', |
| ['rebase_path(target_gen_dir, "//some/arbitrary/path")']), |
| MockAffectedFile('base/okay_slash/BUILD.gn', |
| ['rebase_path(".", "//")']), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckGnRebasePath(mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual([], warnings) |
| |
| |
| class NewHeaderWithoutGnChangeTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testAddHeaderWithoutGn(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', ''), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings)) |
| self.assertTrue('base/stuff.h' in warnings[0].items) |
| |
| def testModifyHeader(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', '', action='M'), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings)) |
| |
| def testDeleteHeader(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', '', action='D'), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings)) |
| |
| def testAddHeaderWithGn(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', ''), |
| MockAffectedFile('base/BUILD.gn', 'stuff.h'), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings)) |
| |
| def testAddHeaderWithGni(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', ''), |
| MockAffectedFile('base/files.gni', 'stuff.h'), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings)) |
| |
| def testAddHeaderWithOther(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', ''), |
| MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.cc', 'stuff.h'), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings)) |
| |
| def testAddHeaderWithWrongGn(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', ''), |
| MockAffectedFile('base/BUILD.gn', 'stuff_h'), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings)) |
| |
| def testAddHeadersWithGn(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', ''), |
| MockAffectedFile('base/another.h', ''), |
| MockAffectedFile('base/BUILD.gn', 'another.h\nstuff.h'), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings)) |
| |
| def testAddHeadersWithWrongGn(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', ''), |
| MockAffectedFile('base/another.h', ''), |
| MockAffectedFile('base/BUILD.gn', 'another_h\nstuff.h'), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings)) |
| self.assertFalse('base/stuff.h' in warnings[0].items) |
| self.assertTrue('base/another.h' in warnings[0].items) |
| |
| def testAddHeadersWithWrongGn2(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', ''), |
| MockAffectedFile('base/another.h', ''), |
| MockAffectedFile('base/BUILD.gn', 'another_h\nstuff_h'), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings)) |
| self.assertTrue('base/stuff.h' in warnings[0].items) |
| self.assertTrue('base/another.h' in warnings[0].items) |
| |
| |
| class CorrectProductNameInMessagesTest(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def testProductNameInDesc(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/google_chrome_strings.grd', [ |
| '<message name="Foo" desc="Welcome to Chrome">', |
| ' Welcome to Chrome!', |
| '</message>', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd', [ |
| '<message name="Bar" desc="Welcome to Chrome">', |
| ' Welcome to Chromium!', |
| '</message>', |
| ]), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckCorrectProductNameInMessages( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings)) |
| |
| def testChromeInChromium(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/google_chrome_strings.grd', [ |
| '<message name="Foo" desc="Welcome to Chrome">', |
| ' Welcome to Chrome!', |
| '</message>', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd', [ |
| '<message name="Bar" desc="Welcome to Chrome">', |
| ' Welcome to Chrome!', |
| '</message>', |
| ]), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckCorrectProductNameInMessages( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings)) |
| self.assertTrue( |
| 'chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd' in warnings[0].items[0]) |
| |
| def testChromiumInChrome(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/google_chrome_strings.grd', [ |
| '<message name="Foo" desc="Welcome to Chrome">', |
| ' Welcome to Chromium!', |
| '</message>', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd', [ |
| '<message name="Bar" desc="Welcome to Chrome">', |
| ' Welcome to Chromium!', |
| '</message>', |
| ]), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckCorrectProductNameInMessages( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings)) |
| self.assertTrue( |
| 'chrome/app/google_chrome_strings.grd:2' in warnings[0].items[0]) |
| |
| def testChromeForTestingInChromium(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd', [ |
| '<message name="Bar" desc="Welcome to Chrome">', |
| ' Welcome to Chrome for Testing!', |
| '</message>', |
| ]), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckCorrectProductNameInMessages( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings)) |
| |
| def testChromeForTestingInChrome(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/google_chrome_strings.grd', [ |
| '<message name="Bar" desc="Welcome to Chrome">', |
| ' Welcome to Chrome for Testing!', |
| '</message>', |
| ]), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckCorrectProductNameInMessages( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings)) |
| self.assertTrue( |
| 'chrome/app/google_chrome_strings.grd:2' in warnings[0].items[0]) |
| |
| def testMultipleInstances(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd', [ |
| '<message name="Bar" desc="Welcome to Chrome">', |
| ' Welcome to Chrome!', |
| '</message>', |
| '<message name="Baz" desc="A correct message">', |
| ' Chromium is the software you are using.', |
| '</message>', |
| '<message name="Bat" desc="An incorrect message">', |
| ' Google Chrome is the software you are using.', |
| '</message>', |
| ]), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckCorrectProductNameInMessages( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings)) |
| self.assertTrue( |
| 'chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd:2' in warnings[0].items[0]) |
| self.assertTrue( |
| 'chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd:8' in warnings[0].items[1]) |
| |
| def testMultipleWarnings(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd', [ |
| '<message name="Bar" desc="Welcome to Chrome">', |
| ' Welcome to Chrome!', |
| '</message>', |
| '<message name="Baz" desc="A correct message">', |
| ' Chromium is the software you are using.', |
| '</message>', |
| '<message name="Bat" desc="An incorrect message">', |
| ' Google Chrome is the software you are using.', |
| '</message>', |
| ]), |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| 'components/components_google_chrome_strings.grd', [ |
| '<message name="Bar" desc="Welcome to Chrome">', |
| ' Welcome to Chrome!', |
| '</message>', |
| '<message name="Baz" desc="A correct message">', |
| ' Chromium is the software you are using.', |
| '</message>', |
| '<message name="Bat" desc="An incorrect message">', |
| ' Google Chrome is the software you are using.', |
| '</message>', |
| ]), |
| ] |
| warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckCorrectProductNameInMessages( |
| mock_input_api, MockOutputApi()) |
| self.assertEqual(2, len(warnings)) |
| self.assertTrue('components/components_google_chrome_strings.grd:5' in |
| warnings[0].items[0]) |
| self.assertTrue( |
| 'chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd:2' in warnings[1].items[0]) |
| self.assertTrue( |
| 'chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd:8' in warnings[1].items[1]) |
| |
| |
| class _SecurityOwnersTestCase(unittest.TestCase): |
| |
| def _createMockInputApi(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| |
| def FakeRepositoryRoot(): |
| return mock_input_api.os_path.join('chromium', 'src') |
| |
| mock_input_api.change.RepositoryRoot = FakeRepositoryRoot |
| self._injectFakeOwnersClient( |
| mock_input_api, ['apple@chromium.org', 'orange@chromium.org']) |
| return mock_input_api |
| |
| def _setupFakeChange(self, input_api): |
| |
| class FakeGerrit(object): |
| |
| def IsOwnersOverrideApproved(self, issue): |
| return False |
| |
| input_api.change.issue = 123 |
| input_api.gerrit = FakeGerrit() |
| |
| def _injectFakeOwnersClient(self, input_api, owners): |
| |
| class FakeOwnersClient(object): |
| |
| def ListOwners(self, f): |
| return owners |
| |
| input_api.owners_client = FakeOwnersClient() |
| |
| def _injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(self, input_api, owner, reviewers): |
| |
| def MockOwnerAndReviewers(input_api, |
| email_regexp, |
| approval_needed=False): |
| return [owner, reviewers] |
| |
| input_api.canned_checks.GetCodereviewOwnerAndReviewers = \ |
| MockOwnerAndReviewers |
| |
| |
| class IpcSecurityOwnerTest(_SecurityOwnersTestCase): |
| _test_cases = [ |
| ('*_messages.cc', 'scary_messages.cc'), |
| ('*_messages*.h', 'scary_messages.h'), |
| ('*_messages*.h', 'scary_messages_android.h'), |
| ('*_param_traits*.*', 'scary_param_traits.h'), |
| ('*_param_traits*.*', 'scary_param_traits_win.h'), |
| ('*.mojom', 'scary.mojom'), |
| ('*_mojom_traits*.*', 'scary_mojom_traits.h'), |
| ('*_mojom_traits*.*', 'scary_mojom_traits_mac.h'), |
| ('*_type_converter*.*', 'scary_type_converter.h'), |
| ('*_type_converter*.*', 'scary_type_converter_nacl.h'), |
| ('*.aidl', 'scary.aidl'), |
| ] |
| |
| def testHasCorrectPerFileRulesAndSecurityReviewer(self): |
| mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi() |
| new_owners_file_path = mock_input_api.os_path.join( |
| 'services', 'goat', 'public', 'OWNERS') |
| new_owners_file = [ |
| 'per-file *.mojom=set noparent', |
| 'per-file *.mojom=file://ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS' |
| ] |
| |
| def FakeReadFile(filename): |
| self.assertEqual( |
| mock_input_api.os_path.join('chromium', 'src', |
| new_owners_file_path), filename) |
| return '\n'.join(new_owners_file) |
| |
| mock_input_api.ReadFile = FakeReadFile |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile(new_owners_file_path, new_owners_file), |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| mock_input_api.os_path.join('services', 'goat', 'public', |
| 'goat.mojom'), |
| ['// Scary contents.']) |
| ] |
| self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api) |
| self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api, |
| 'owner@chromium.org', |
| ['orange@chromium.org']) |
| mock_input_api.is_committing = True |
| mock_input_api.dry_run = False |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, |
| mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(0, len(results)) |
| |
| def testMissingSecurityReviewerAtUpload(self): |
| mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi() |
| new_owners_file_path = mock_input_api.os_path.join( |
| 'services', 'goat', 'public', 'OWNERS') |
| new_owners_file = [ |
| 'per-file *.mojom=set noparent', |
| 'per-file *.mojom=file://ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS' |
| ] |
| |
| def FakeReadFile(filename): |
| self.assertEqual( |
| mock_input_api.os_path.join('chromium', 'src', |
| new_owners_file_path), filename) |
| return '\n'.join(new_owners_file) |
| |
| mock_input_api.ReadFile = FakeReadFile |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile(new_owners_file_path, new_owners_file), |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| mock_input_api.os_path.join('services', 'goat', 'public', |
| 'goat.mojom'), |
| ['// Scary contents.']) |
| ] |
| self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api) |
| self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api, |
| 'owner@chromium.org', |
| ['banana@chromium.org']) |
| mock_input_api.is_committing = False |
| mock_input_api.dry_run = False |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, |
| mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(results)) |
| self.assertEqual('notify', results[0].type) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 'Review from an owner in ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS is required for the ' |
| 'following newly-added files:', results[0].message) |
| |
| def testMissingSecurityReviewerAtDryRunCommit(self): |
| mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi() |
| new_owners_file_path = mock_input_api.os_path.join( |
| 'services', 'goat', 'public', 'OWNERS') |
| new_owners_file = [ |
| 'per-file *.mojom=set noparent', |
| 'per-file *.mojom=file://ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS' |
| ] |
| |
| def FakeReadFile(filename): |
| self.assertEqual( |
| mock_input_api.os_path.join('chromium', 'src', |
| new_owners_file_path), filename) |
| return '\n'.join(new_owners_file) |
| |
| mock_input_api.ReadFile = FakeReadFile |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile(new_owners_file_path, new_owners_file), |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| mock_input_api.os_path.join('services', 'goat', 'public', |
| 'goat.mojom'), |
| ['// Scary contents.']) |
| ] |
| self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api) |
| self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api, |
| 'owner@chromium.org', |
| ['banana@chromium.org']) |
| mock_input_api.is_committing = True |
| mock_input_api.dry_run = True |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, |
| mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(results)) |
| self.assertEqual('error', results[0].type) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 'Review from an owner in ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS is required for the ' |
| 'following newly-added files:', results[0].message) |
| |
| def testMissingSecurityApprovalAtRealCommit(self): |
| mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi() |
| new_owners_file_path = mock_input_api.os_path.join( |
| 'services', 'goat', 'public', 'OWNERS') |
| new_owners_file = [ |
| 'per-file *.mojom=set noparent', |
| 'per-file *.mojom=file://ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS' |
| ] |
| |
| def FakeReadFile(filename): |
| self.assertEqual( |
| mock_input_api.os_path.join('chromium', 'src', |
| new_owners_file_path), filename) |
| return '\n'.join(new_owners_file) |
| |
| mock_input_api.ReadFile = FakeReadFile |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile(new_owners_file_path, new_owners_file), |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| mock_input_api.os_path.join('services', 'goat', 'public', |
| 'goat.mojom'), |
| ['// Scary contents.']) |
| ] |
| self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api) |
| self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api, |
| 'owner@chromium.org', |
| ['banana@chromium.org']) |
| mock_input_api.is_committing = True |
| mock_input_api.dry_run = False |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, |
| mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual('error', results[0].type) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| 'Review from an owner in ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS is required for the ' |
| 'following newly-added files:', results[0].message) |
| |
| def testIpcChangeNeedsSecurityOwner(self): |
| for is_committing in [True, False]: |
| for pattern, filename in self._test_cases: |
| with self.subTest( |
| line= |
| f'is_committing={is_committing}, filename={filename}'): |
| mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| mock_input_api.os_path.join( |
| 'services', 'goat', 'public', filename), |
| ['// Scary contents.']) |
| ] |
| self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api) |
| self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers( |
| mock_input_api, 'owner@chromium.org', |
| ['banana@chromium.org']) |
| mock_input_api.is_committing = is_committing |
| mock_input_api.dry_run = False |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| results = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners( |
| mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(results)) |
| self.assertEqual('error', results[0].type) |
| self.assertTrue(results[0].message.replace( |
| '\\', '/' |
| ).startswith( |
| 'Found missing OWNERS lines for security-sensitive files. ' |
| 'Please add the following lines to services/goat/public/OWNERS:' |
| )) |
| self.assertEqual(['ipc-security-reviews@chromium.org'], |
| mock_output_api.more_cc) |
| |
| def testServiceManifestChangeNeedsSecurityOwner(self): |
| mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| mock_input_api.os_path.join('services', 'goat', 'public', |
| 'cpp', 'manifest.cc'), |
| [ |
| '#include "services/goat/public/cpp/manifest.h"', |
| 'const service_manager::Manifest& GetManifest() {}', |
| ]) |
| ] |
| self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api) |
| self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api, |
| 'owner@chromium.org', |
| ['banana@chromium.org']) |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(errors)) |
| self.assertTrue(errors[0].message.replace('\\', '/').startswith( |
| 'Found missing OWNERS lines for security-sensitive files. ' |
| 'Please add the following lines to services/goat/public/cpp/OWNERS:' |
| )) |
| self.assertEqual(['ipc-security-reviews@chromium.org'], |
| mock_output_api.more_cc) |
| |
| def testNonServiceManifestSourceChangesDoNotRequireSecurityOwner(self): |
| mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi() |
| self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api, |
| 'owner@chromium.org', |
| ['banana@chromium.org']) |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('some/non/service/thing/foo_manifest.cc', [ |
| 'const char kNoEnforcement[] = "not a manifest!";', |
| ]) |
| ] |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual([], errors) |
| self.assertEqual([], mock_output_api.more_cc) |
| |
| |
| class FuchsiaSecurityOwnerTest(_SecurityOwnersTestCase): |
| |
| def testFidlChangeNeedsSecurityOwner(self): |
| mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('potentially/scary/ipc.fidl', |
| ['library test.fidl']) |
| ] |
| self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api) |
| self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api, |
| 'owner@chromium.org', |
| ['banana@chromium.org']) |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(errors)) |
| self.assertTrue(errors[0].message.replace('\\', '/').startswith( |
| 'Found missing OWNERS lines for security-sensitive files. ' |
| 'Please add the following lines to potentially/scary/OWNERS:')) |
| |
| def testComponentManifestV1ChangeNeedsSecurityOwner(self): |
| mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('potentially/scary/v2_manifest.cmx', |
| ['{ "that is no": "manifest!" }']) |
| ] |
| self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api) |
| self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api, |
| 'owner@chromium.org', |
| ['banana@chromium.org']) |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(errors)) |
| self.assertTrue(errors[0].message.replace('\\', '/').startswith( |
| 'Found missing OWNERS lines for security-sensitive files. ' |
| 'Please add the following lines to potentially/scary/OWNERS:')) |
| |
| def testComponentManifestV2NeedsSecurityOwner(self): |
| mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('potentially/scary/v2_manifest.cml', |
| ['{ "that is no": "manifest!" }']) |
| ] |
| self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api) |
| self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api, |
| 'owner@chromium.org', |
| ['banana@chromium.org']) |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual(1, len(errors)) |
| self.assertTrue(errors[0].message.replace('\\', '/').startswith( |
| 'Found missing OWNERS lines for security-sensitive files. ' |
| 'Please add the following lines to potentially/scary/OWNERS:')) |
| |
| def testThirdPartyTestsDoNotRequireSecurityOwner(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api, |
| 'owner@chromium.org', |
| ['banana@chromium.org']) |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('third_party/crashpad/test/tests.cmx', [ |
| 'const char kNoEnforcement[] = "Security?!? Pah!";', |
| ]) |
| ] |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual([], errors) |
| |
| def testOtherFuchsiaChangesDoNotRequireSecurityOwner(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api, |
| 'owner@chromium.org', |
| ['banana@chromium.org']) |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile( |
| 'some/non/service/thing/fuchsia_fidl_cml_cmx_magic.cc', [ |
| 'const char kNoEnforcement[] = "Security?!? Pah!";', |
| ]) |
| ] |
| mock_output_api = MockOutputApi() |
| errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, mock_output_api) |
| self.assertEqual([], errors) |
| |
| |
| class SecurityChangeTest(_SecurityOwnersTestCase): |
| |
| def testDiffGetServiceSandboxType(self): |
| mock_input_api = MockInputApi() |
| mock_input_api.files = [ |
| MockAffectedFile('services/goat/teleporter_host.cc', [ |
| 'template <>', 'inline content::SandboxType', |
| 'content::GetServiceSandboxType<chrome::mojom::GoatTeleporter>() {', |
| '#if defined(OS_WIN)', ' return SandboxType::kGoaty;', |
| '#else', ' return SandboxType::kNoSandbox;', |
| '#endif // !defined(OS_WIN)', '}' |
| ]), |
| ] |
| files_to_functions = PRESUBMIT._GetFilesUsingSecurityCriticalFunctions( |
| mock_input_api) |
| self.assertEqual( |
| { |
| 'services/goat/teleporter_host.cc': |
| set(['content::GetServiceSandboxType<>()']) |
| }, files_to_functions) |
| |
| def testDiffRemovingLine(self): |
| mock_input_api = |