blob: 8f57043f00aa98dcea2213ac98d8fa850f158766 [file] [log] [blame]
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE glsa SYSTEM "http://www.gentoo.org/dtd/glsa.dtd">
<glsa id="201206-22">
<title>Samba: Multiple vulnerabilities</title>
<synopsis>Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in Samba, the worst of
which may allow execution of arbitrary code with root privileges.
</synopsis>
<product type="ebuild">Samba</product>
<announced>June 24, 2012</announced>
<revised>June 24, 2012: 1</revised>
<bug>290633</bug>
<bug>310105</bug>
<bug>323785</bug>
<bug>332063</bug>
<bug>337295</bug>
<bug>356917</bug>
<bug>382263</bug>
<bug>386375</bug>
<bug>405551</bug>
<bug>411487</bug>
<bug>414319</bug>
<access>local, remote</access>
<affected>
<package name="net-fs/samba" auto="yes" arch="*">
<unaffected range="ge">3.5.15</unaffected>
<vulnerable range="lt">3.5.15</vulnerable>
</package>
</affected>
<background>
<p>Samba is a suite of SMB and CIFS client/server programs.</p>
</background>
<description>
<p>Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Samba. Please review
the CVE identifiers referenced below for details.
</p>
</description>
<impact type="high">
<p>A remote attacker could possibly execute arbitrary code with root
privileges, cause a Denial of Service condition, take ownership of shared
files, or bypass file permissions. Furthermore, a local attacker may be
able to cause a Denial of Service condition or obtain sensitive
information in a Samba credentials file.
</p>
</impact>
<workaround>
<p>There is no known workaround at this time.</p>
</workaround>
<resolution>
<p>All Samba users should upgrade to the latest version:</p>
<code>
# emerge --sync
# emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose "&gt;=net-fs/samba-3.5.15"
</code>
</resolution>
<references>
<uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2009-2906">CVE-2009-2906</uri>
<uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2009-2948">CVE-2009-2948</uri>
<uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-0728">CVE-2010-0728</uri>
<uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-1635">CVE-2010-1635</uri>
<uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-1642">CVE-2010-1642</uri>
<uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-2063">CVE-2010-2063</uri>
<uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-3069">CVE-2010-3069</uri>
<uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-0719">CVE-2011-0719</uri>
<uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-1678">CVE-2011-1678</uri>
<uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2011-2724">CVE-2011-2724</uri>
<uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-0870">CVE-2012-0870</uri>
<uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-1182">CVE-2012-1182</uri>
<uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-2111">CVE-2012-2111</uri>
</references>
<metadata timestamp="Fri, 07 Oct 2011 23:36:59 +0000" tag="requester">
underling
</metadata>
<metadata timestamp="Sun, 24 Jun 2012 12:38:35 +0000" tag="submitter">ackle</metadata>
</glsa>