Interested in participating? Please follow the same contributing guidelines as the design repository.
Also, please be sure to read the README.md for this repository.
Contributors may use whatever tools they would like to craft their contributions, but there must be a human in the loop. Contributors must understand their contributions before sending them for review and must ensure that their correctness, design, and style meet the standards of the project. The contributor is always the author and is fully accountable for their contributions. Contributors should be sufficiently confident that the contribution is high enough quality that asking for a review is a good use of scarce maintainer time, and they should be able to answer questions about their work during review. To aid reviewers, contributors should flag areas they are not confident about that had AI assistance. This can be done in PR comments, the PR description, or in code comments.
Contributors must attest that the code they submit is their original creation, regardless of whether AI tooling was used.
When engaged in discussion (code review, bugs, etc), a human reply must get a human reply. Even in cases where an AI agent initiates a conversation (e.g. by filing a bug or writing a PR description), its human operator is responsible for the content of its output, including its correctness and quality.
This policy borrows heavily from the policies of LLVM and Chromium.
Use this handy checklist to make sure your new instructions are fully supported: