| # Contributing to Docker |
| |
| This page contains information about reporting issues as well as some tips and |
| guidelines useful to experienced open source contributors. Finally, make sure |
| you read our [community guidelines](#docker-community-guidelines) before you |
| start participating. |
| |
| ## Topics |
| |
| * [Reporting Security Issues](#reporting-security-issues) |
| * [Design and Cleanup Proposals](#design-and-cleanup-proposals) |
| * [Reporting Issues](#reporting-other-issues) |
| * [Quick Contribution Tips and Guidelines](#quick-contribution-tips-and-guidelines) |
| * [Community Guidelines](#docker-community-guidelines) |
| |
| ## Reporting security issues |
| |
| The Docker maintainers take security seriously. If you discover a security |
| issue, bring it to their attention right away! |
| |
| **DO NOT** file a public issue, instead send your report privately to |
| [security@docker.com](mailto:security@docker.com). |
| |
| Security reports are greatly appreciated and we will publicly thank you for it. |
| We also like to send gifts—if you're into Docker schwag, make sure to let |
| us know. We currently do not offer a paid security bounty program, but are not |
| ruling it out in the future. |
| |
| |
| ## Reporting other issues |
| |
| A great way to contribute to the project is to send a detailed report when you |
| encounter an issue. We always appreciate a well-written, thorough bug report, |
| and will thank you for it! |
| |
| Check that [our issue database](https://github.com/docker/cli/issues) |
| doesn't already include that problem or suggestion before submitting an issue. |
| If you find a match, you can use the "subscribe" button to get notified on |
| updates. Do *not* leave random "+1" or "I have this too" comments, as they |
| only clutter the discussion, and don't help resolving it. However, if you |
| have ways to reproduce the issue or have additional information that may help |
| resolving the issue, leave a comment. |
| |
| When reporting issues, always include: |
| |
| * The output of `docker version`. |
| * The output of `docker info`. |
| |
| Also include the steps required to reproduce the problem if possible and |
| applicable. This information will help us review and fix your issue faster. |
| When sending lengthy log-files, consider posting them as a gist (https://gist.github.com). |
| Don't forget to remove sensitive data from your logfiles before posting (you can |
| replace those parts with "REDACTED"). |
| |
| ## Quick contribution tips and guidelines |
| |
| This section gives the experienced contributor some tips and guidelines. |
| |
| ### Pull requests are always welcome |
| |
| Not sure if that typo is worth a pull request? Found a bug and know how to fix |
| it? Do it! We will appreciate it. Any significant improvement should be |
| documented as [a GitHub issue](https://github.com/docker/cli/issues) before |
| anybody starts working on it. |
| |
| We are always thrilled to receive pull requests. We do our best to process them |
| quickly. If your pull request is not accepted on the first try, |
| don't get discouraged! Our contributor's guide explains [the review process we |
| use for simple changes](https://github.com/docker/docker/blob/master/project/REVIEWING.md). |
| |
| ### Talking to other Docker users and contributors |
| |
| <table class="tg"> |
| <col width="45%"> |
| <col width="65%"> |
| <tr> |
| <td>Forums</td> |
| <td> |
| A public forum for users to discuss questions and explore current design patterns and |
| best practices about Docker and related projects in the Docker Ecosystem. To participate, |
| just log in with your Docker Hub account on <a href="https://forums.docker.com" target="_blank">https://forums.docker.com</a>. |
| </td> |
| </tr> |
| <tr> |
| <td>Community Slack</td> |
| <td> |
| The Docker Community has a dedicated Slack chat to discuss features and issues. You can sign-up <a href="https://dockr.ly/comm-slack" target="_blank">with this link</a>. |
| </td> |
| </tr> |
| <tr> |
| <td>Twitter</td> |
| <td> |
| You can follow <a href="https://twitter.com/docker/" target="_blank">Docker's Twitter feed</a> |
| to get updates on our products. You can also tweet us questions or just |
| share blogs or stories. |
| </td> |
| </tr> |
| <tr> |
| <td>Stack Overflow</td> |
| <td> |
| Stack Overflow has over 17000 Docker questions listed. We regularly |
| monitor <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/search?tab=newest&q=docker" target="_blank">Docker questions</a> |
| and so do many other knowledgeable Docker users. |
| </td> |
| </tr> |
| </table> |
| |
| |
| ### Conventions |
| |
| Fork the repository and make changes on your fork in a feature branch: |
| |
| - If it's a bug fix branch, name it XXXX-something where XXXX is the number of |
| the issue. |
| - If it's a feature branch, create an enhancement issue to announce |
| your intentions, and name it XXXX-something where XXXX is the number of the |
| issue. |
| |
| Submit unit tests for your changes. Go has a great test framework built in; use |
| it! Take a look at existing tests for inspiration. [Run the full test |
| suite](README.md) on your branch before |
| submitting a pull request. |
| |
| Update the documentation when creating or modifying features. Test your |
| documentation changes for clarity, concision, and correctness, as well as a |
| clean documentation build. See our contributors guide for [our style |
| guide](https://docs.docker.com/contribute/style/grammar/) and instructions on [building |
| the documentation](https://docs.docker.com/contribute/). |
| |
| Write clean code. Universally formatted code promotes ease of writing, reading, |
| and maintenance. Always run `gofmt -s -w file.go` on each changed file before |
| committing your changes. Most editors have plug-ins that do this automatically. |
| |
| Pull request descriptions should be as clear as possible and include a reference |
| to all the issues that they address. |
| |
| Commit messages must be written in the imperative mood (max. 72 chars), followed |
| by an optional, more detailed explanatory text usually expanding on |
| why the work is necessary. The explanatory text should be separated by an |
| empty line. |
| |
| The commit message *could* have a prefix scoping the change, however this is |
| not enforced. Common prefixes are `docs: <message>`, `vendor: <message>`, |
| `chore: <message>` or the package/area related to the change such as `pkg/foo: <message>` |
| or `telemetry: <message>`. |
| |
| A standard commit. |
| ``` |
| Fix the exploding flux capacitor |
| |
| A call to function A causes the flux capacitor to blow up every time |
| the sun and the moon align. |
| ``` |
| |
| Using a package as prefix. |
| ``` |
| pkg/foo: prevent panic in flux capacitor |
| |
| Calling function A causes the flux capacitor to blow up every time |
| the sun and the moon align. |
| ``` |
| |
| Updating a specific vendored package. |
| ``` |
| vendor: github.com/docker/docker 6ac445c42bad (master, v28.0-dev) |
| ``` |
| |
| Fixing a broken docs link. |
| ``` |
| docs: fix style/lint issues in deprecated.md |
| ``` |
| |
| Code review comments may be added to your pull request. Discuss, then make the |
| suggested modifications and push additional commits to your feature branch. Post |
| a comment after pushing. New commits show up in the pull request automatically, |
| but the reviewers are notified only when you comment. |
| |
| Pull requests must be cleanly rebased on top of master without multiple branches |
| mixed into the PR. |
| |
| **Git tip**: If your PR no longer merges cleanly, use `rebase master` in your |
| feature branch to update your pull request rather than `merge master`. |
| |
| Before you make a pull request, squash your commits into logical units of work |
| using `git rebase -i` and `git push -f`. A logical unit of work is a consistent |
| set of patches that should be reviewed together: for example, upgrading the |
| version of a vendored dependency and taking advantage of its now available new |
| feature constitute two separate units of work. Implementing a new function and |
| calling it in another file constitute a single logical unit of work. The very |
| high majority of submissions should have a single commit, so if in doubt: squash |
| down to one. |
| |
| After every commit, make sure the test suite passes. Include documentation |
| changes in the same pull request so that a revert would remove all traces of |
| the feature or fix. |
| |
| Include an issue reference like `Closes #XXXX` or `Fixes #XXXX` in the pull request |
| description that close an issue. Including references automatically closes the issue |
| on a merge. |
| |
| Do not add yourself to the `AUTHORS` file, as it is regenerated regularly |
| from the Git history. |
| |
| See the [Coding Style](#coding-style) for further guidelines. |
| |
| ### Merge approval |
| |
| Docker maintainers use LGTM (Looks Good To Me) in comments on the code review to |
| indicate acceptance. |
| |
| A change requires LGTMs from an absolute majority of the maintainers of each |
| component affected. For example, if a change affects `docs/` and `registry/`, it |
| needs an absolute majority from the maintainers of `docs/` AND, separately, an |
| absolute majority of the maintainers of `registry/`. |
| |
| For more details, see the [MAINTAINERS](MAINTAINERS) page. |
| |
| ### Sign your work |
| |
| The sign-off is a simple line at the end of the explanation for the patch. Your |
| signature certifies that you wrote the patch or otherwise have the right to pass |
| it on as an open-source patch. The rules are pretty simple: if you can certify |
| the below (from [developercertificate.org](https://developercertificate.org): |
| |
| ``` |
| Developer Certificate of Origin |
| Version 1.1 |
| |
| Copyright (C) 2004, 2006 The Linux Foundation and its contributors. |
| 660 York Street, Suite 102, |
| San Francisco, CA 94110 USA |
| |
| Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this |
| license document, but changing it is not allowed. |
| |
| Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1 |
| |
| By making a contribution to this project, I certify that: |
| |
| (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I |
| have the right to submit it under the open source license |
| indicated in the file; or |
| |
| (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best |
| of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source |
| license and I have the right under that license to submit that |
| work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part |
| by me, under the same open source license (unless I am |
| permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated |
| in the file; or |
| |
| (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other |
| person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified |
| it. |
| |
| (d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution |
| are public and that a record of the contribution (including all |
| personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is |
| maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with |
| this project or the open source license(s) involved. |
| ``` |
| |
| Then you just add a line to every git commit message: |
| |
| Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@email.com> |
| |
| Use your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.) |
| |
| If you set your `user.name` and `user.email` git configs, you can sign your |
| commit automatically with `git commit -s`. |
| |
| ### How can I become a maintainer? |
| |
| The procedures for adding new maintainers are explained in the |
| global [MAINTAINERS](https://github.com/docker/opensource/blob/master/MAINTAINERS) |
| file in the [https://github.com/docker/opensource/](https://github.com/docker/opensource/) |
| repository. |
| |
| Don't forget: being a maintainer is a time investment. Make sure you |
| will have time to make yourself available. You don't have to be a |
| maintainer to make a difference on the project! |
| |
| ## Docker community guidelines |
| |
| We want to keep the Docker community awesome, growing and collaborative. We need |
| your help to keep it that way. To help with this we've come up with some general |
| guidelines for the community as a whole: |
| |
| * Be nice: Be courteous, respectful and polite to fellow community members: |
| no regional, racial, gender, or other abuse will be tolerated. We like |
| nice people way better than mean ones! |
| |
| * Encourage diversity and participation: Make everyone in our community feel |
| welcome, regardless of their background and the extent of their |
| contributions, and do everything possible to encourage participation in |
| our community. |
| |
| * Keep it legal: Basically, don't get us in trouble. Share only content that |
| you own, do not share private or sensitive information, and don't break |
| the law. |
| |
| * Stay on topic: Make sure that you are posting to the correct channel and |
| avoid off-topic discussions. Remember when you update an issue or respond |
| to an email you are potentially sending to a large number of people. Consider |
| this before you update. Also remember that nobody likes spam. |
| |
| * Don't send email to the maintainers: There's no need to send email to the |
| maintainers to ask them to investigate an issue or to take a look at a |
| pull request. Instead of sending an email, GitHub mentions should be |
| used to ping maintainers to review a pull request, a proposal or an |
| issue. |
| |
| ### Guideline violations — 3 strikes method |
| |
| The point of this section is not to find opportunities to punish people, but we |
| do need a fair way to deal with people who are making our community suck. |
| |
| 1. First occurrence: We'll give you a friendly, but public reminder that the |
| behavior is inappropriate according to our guidelines. |
| |
| 2. Second occurrence: We will send you a private message with a warning that |
| any additional violations will result in removal from the community. |
| |
| 3. Third occurrence: Depending on the violation, we may need to delete or ban |
| your account. |
| |
| **Notes:** |
| |
| * Obvious spammers are banned on first occurrence. If we don't do this, we'll |
| have spam all over the place. |
| |
| * Violations are forgiven after 6 months of good behavior, and we won't hold a |
| grudge. |
| |
| * People who commit minor infractions will get some education, rather than |
| hammering them in the 3 strikes process. |
| |
| * The rules apply equally to everyone in the community, no matter how much |
| you've contributed. |
| |
| * Extreme violations of a threatening, abusive, destructive or illegal nature |
| will be addressed immediately and are not subject to 3 strikes or forgiveness. |
| |
| * Contact abuse@docker.com to report abuse or appeal violations. In the case of |
| appeals, we know that mistakes happen, and we'll work with you to come up with a |
| fair solution if there has been a misunderstanding. |
| |
| ## Coding Style |
| |
| Unless explicitly stated, we follow all coding guidelines from the Go |
| community. While some of these standards may seem arbitrary, they somehow seem |
| to result in a solid, consistent codebase. |
| |
| It is possible that the code base does not currently comply with these |
| guidelines. We are not looking for a massive PR that fixes this, since that |
| goes against the spirit of the guidelines. All new contributions should make a |
| best effort to clean up and make the code base better than they left it. |
| Obviously, apply your best judgement. Remember, the goal here is to make the |
| code base easier for humans to navigate and understand. Always keep that in |
| mind when nudging others to comply. |
| |
| The rules: |
| |
| 1. All code should be formatted with `gofumpt` (preferred) or `gofmt -s`. |
| 2. All code should pass the default levels of |
| [`golint`](https://github.com/golang/lint). |
| 3. All code should follow the guidelines covered in [Effective Go](https://go.dev/doc/effective_go) |
| and [Go Code Review Comments](https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/CodeReviewComments). |
| 4. Comment the code. Tell us the why, the history and the context. |
| 5. Document _all_ declarations and methods, even private ones. Declare |
| expectations, caveats and anything else that may be important. If a type |
| gets exported, having the comments already there will ensure it's ready. |
| 6. Variable name length should be proportional to its context and no longer. |
| `noCommaALongVariableNameLikeThisIsNotMoreClearWhenASimpleCommentWouldDo`. |
| In practice, short methods will have short variable names and globals will |
| have longer names. |
| 7. No underscores in package names. If you need a compound name, step back, |
| and re-examine why you need a compound name. If you still think you need a |
| compound name, lose the underscore. |
| 8. No utils or helpers packages. If a function is not general enough to |
| warrant its own package, it has not been written generally enough to be a |
| part of a util package. Just leave it unexported and well-documented. |
| 9. All tests should run with `go test` and outside tooling should not be |
| required. No, we don't need another unit testing framework. Assertion |
| packages are acceptable if they provide _real_ incremental value. |
| 10. Even though we call these "rules" above, they are actually just |
| guidelines. Since you've read all the rules, you now know that. |
| |
| If you are having trouble getting into the mood of idiomatic Go, we recommend |
| reading through [Effective Go](https://go.dev/doc/effective_go). The |
| [Go Blog](https://go.dev/blog/) is also a great resource. Drinking the |
| kool-aid is a lot easier than going thirsty. |