[ASTImporter] Call to HandleNameConflict in VisitRecordDecl mistakeningly using Name instead of SearchName

https://reviews.llvm.org/D51633 added error handling to the ASTNodeImporter::VisitRecordDecl for the conflicting names case. This could lead to erroneous return of an error in that case since we should have been using SearchName. Name may be empty in the case where we find the name via D->getTypedefNameForAnonDecl()->getDeclName().

This fix is very similar to https://reviews.llvm.org/D59665

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62352

llvm-svn: 361650
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp
index 74a1887..2b74704 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp
@@ -2585,7 +2585,7 @@
     } // for
     if (!ConflictingDecls.empty() && SearchName) {
-      Name = Importer.HandleNameConflict(Name, DC, IDNS,
+      Name = Importer.HandleNameConflict(SearchName, DC, IDNS,
       if (!Name)