| // Copyright 2021 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved. |
| // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be |
| // found in the LICENSE file. |
| |
| // Toom-Cook multiplication. |
| // Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toom%E2%80%93Cook_multiplication |
| |
| #include <algorithm> |
| |
| #include "src/bigint/bigint-internal.h" |
| #include "src/bigint/digit-arithmetic.h" |
| #include "src/bigint/vector-arithmetic.h" |
| |
| namespace v8 { |
| namespace bigint { |
| |
| namespace { |
| |
| void TimesTwo(RWDigits X) { |
| digit_t carry = 0; |
| for (int i = 0; i < X.len(); i++) { |
| digit_t d = X[i]; |
| X[i] = (d << 1) | carry; |
| carry = d >> (kDigitBits - 1); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| void DivideByTwo(RWDigits X) { |
| digit_t carry = 0; |
| for (int i = X.len() - 1; i >= 0; i--) { |
| digit_t d = X[i]; |
| X[i] = (d >> 1) | carry; |
| carry = d << (kDigitBits - 1); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| void DivideByThree(RWDigits X) { |
| digit_t remainder = 0; |
| for (int i = X.len() - 1; i >= 0; i--) { |
| digit_t d = X[i]; |
| digit_t upper = (remainder << kHalfDigitBits) | (d >> kHalfDigitBits); |
| digit_t u_result = upper / 3; |
| remainder = upper - 3 * u_result; |
| digit_t lower = (remainder << kHalfDigitBits) | (d & kHalfDigitMask); |
| digit_t l_result = lower / 3; |
| remainder = lower - 3 * l_result; |
| X[i] = (u_result << kHalfDigitBits) | l_result; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| } // namespace |
| |
| #if DEBUG |
| // Set {len_} to 1 rather than 0 so that attempts to access the first digit |
| // will crash. |
| #define MARK_INVALID(D) D = RWDigits(nullptr, 1) |
| #else |
| #define MARK_INVALID(D) (void(0)) |
| #endif |
| |
| void ProcessorImpl::Toom3Main(RWDigits Z, Digits X, Digits Y) { |
| DCHECK(Z.len() >= X.len() + Y.len()); |
| // Phase 1: Splitting. |
| int i = DIV_CEIL(std::max(X.len(), Y.len()), 3); |
| Digits X0(X, 0, i); |
| Digits X1(X, i, i); |
| Digits X2(X, 2 * i, i); |
| Digits Y0(Y, 0, i); |
| Digits Y1(Y, i, i); |
| Digits Y2(Y, 2 * i, i); |
| |
| // Temporary storage. |
| int p_len = i + 1; // For all px, qx below. |
| int r_len = 2 * p_len; // For all r_x, Rx below. |
| Storage temp_storage(4 * r_len); |
| // We will use the same variable names as the Wikipedia article, as much as |
| // C++ lets us: our "p_m1" is their "p(-1)" etc. For consistency with other |
| // algorithms, we use X and Y where Wikipedia uses m and n. |
| // We will use and re-use the temporary storage as follows: |
| // |
| // chunk | -------- time -----------> |
| // [0 .. i] |( po )( p_m1 ) ( r_m2 ) |
| // [i+1 .. rlen-1] |( qo )( q_m1 ) ( r_m2 ) |
| // [rlen .. rlen+i] | (p_1 ) ( p_m2 ) (r_inf) |
| // [rlen+i+1 .. 2*rlen-1] | (q_1 ) ( q_m2 ) (r_inf) |
| // [2*rlen .. 3*rlen-1] | ( r_1 ) |
| // [3*rlen .. 4*rlen-1] | ( r_m1 ) |
| // |
| // This requires interleaving phases 2 and 3 a bit: after computing |
| // r_1 = p_1 * q_1, we can re-use p_1's storage for p_m2, and so on. |
| digit_t* t = temp_storage.get(); |
| RWDigits po(t, p_len); |
| RWDigits qo(t + p_len, p_len); |
| RWDigits p_1(t + r_len, p_len); |
| RWDigits q_1(t + r_len + p_len, p_len); |
| RWDigits r_1(t + 2 * r_len, r_len); |
| RWDigits r_m1(t + 3 * r_len, r_len); |
| |
| // We can also share the backing stores of Z, r_0, R0. |
| DCHECK(Z.len() >= r_len); |
| RWDigits r_0(Z, 0, r_len); |
| |
| // Phase 2a: Evaluation, steps 0, 1, m1. |
| // po = X0 + X2 |
| Add(po, X0, X2); |
| // p_0 = X0 |
| // p_1 = po + X1 |
| Add(p_1, po, X1); |
| // p_m1 = po - X1 |
| RWDigits p_m1 = po; |
| bool p_m1_sign = SubtractSigned(p_m1, po, false, X1, false); |
| MARK_INVALID(po); |
| |
| // qo = Y0 + Y2 |
| Add(qo, Y0, Y2); |
| // q_0 = Y0 |
| // q_1 = qo + Y1 |
| Add(q_1, qo, Y1); |
| // q_m1 = qo - Y1 |
| RWDigits q_m1 = qo; |
| bool q_m1_sign = SubtractSigned(q_m1, qo, false, Y1, false); |
| MARK_INVALID(qo); |
| |
| // Phase 3a: Pointwise multiplication, steps 0, 1, m1. |
| Multiply(r_0, X0, Y0); |
| Multiply(r_1, p_1, q_1); |
| Multiply(r_m1, p_m1, q_m1); |
| bool r_m1_sign = p_m1_sign != q_m1_sign; |
| |
| // Phase 2b: Evaluation, steps m2 and inf. |
| // p_m2 = (p_m1 + X2) * 2 - X0 |
| RWDigits p_m2 = p_1; |
| MARK_INVALID(p_1); |
| bool p_m2_sign = AddSigned(p_m2, p_m1, p_m1_sign, X2, false); |
| TimesTwo(p_m2); |
| p_m2_sign = SubtractSigned(p_m2, p_m2, p_m2_sign, X0, false); |
| // p_inf = X2 |
| |
| // q_m2 = (q_m1 + Y2) * 2 - Y0 |
| RWDigits q_m2 = q_1; |
| MARK_INVALID(q_1); |
| bool q_m2_sign = AddSigned(q_m2, q_m1, q_m1_sign, Y2, false); |
| TimesTwo(q_m2); |
| q_m2_sign = SubtractSigned(q_m2, q_m2, q_m2_sign, Y0, false); |
| // q_inf = Y2 |
| |
| // Phase 3b: Pointwise multiplication, steps m2 and inf. |
| RWDigits r_m2(t, r_len); |
| MARK_INVALID(p_m1); |
| MARK_INVALID(q_m1); |
| Multiply(r_m2, p_m2, q_m2); |
| bool r_m2_sign = p_m2_sign != q_m2_sign; |
| |
| RWDigits r_inf(t + r_len, r_len); |
| MARK_INVALID(p_m2); |
| MARK_INVALID(q_m2); |
| Multiply(r_inf, X2, Y2); |
| |
| // Phase 4: Interpolation. |
| Digits R0 = r_0; |
| Digits R4 = r_inf; |
| // R3 <- (r_m2 - r_1) / 3 |
| RWDigits R3 = r_m2; |
| bool R3_sign = SubtractSigned(R3, r_m2, r_m2_sign, r_1, false); |
| DivideByThree(R3); |
| // R1 <- (r_1 - r_m1) / 2 |
| RWDigits R1 = r_1; |
| bool R1_sign = SubtractSigned(R1, r_1, false, r_m1, r_m1_sign); |
| DivideByTwo(R1); |
| // R2 <- r_m1 - r_0 |
| RWDigits R2 = r_m1; |
| bool R2_sign = SubtractSigned(R2, r_m1, r_m1_sign, R0, false); |
| // R3 <- (R2 - R3) / 2 + 2 * r_inf |
| R3_sign = SubtractSigned(R3, R2, R2_sign, R3, R3_sign); |
| DivideByTwo(R3); |
| // TODO(jkummerow): Would it be a measurable improvement to write an |
| // "AddTwice" helper? |
| R3_sign = AddSigned(R3, R3, R3_sign, r_inf, false); |
| R3_sign = AddSigned(R3, R3, R3_sign, r_inf, false); |
| // R2 <- R2 + R1 - R4 |
| R2_sign = AddSigned(R2, R2, R2_sign, R1, R1_sign); |
| R2_sign = SubtractSigned(R2, R2, R2_sign, R4, false); |
| // R1 <- R1 - R3 |
| R1_sign = SubtractSigned(R1, R1, R1_sign, R3, R3_sign); |
| |
| #if DEBUG |
| R1.Normalize(); |
| R2.Normalize(); |
| R3.Normalize(); |
| DCHECK(R1_sign == false || R1.len() == 0); |
| DCHECK(R2_sign == false || R2.len() == 0); |
| DCHECK(R3_sign == false || R3.len() == 0); |
| #endif |
| |
| // Phase 5: Recomposition. R0 is already in place. Overflow can't happen. |
| for (int j = R0.len(); j < Z.len(); j++) Z[j] = 0; |
| AddAndReturnOverflow(Z + i, R1); |
| AddAndReturnOverflow(Z + 2 * i, R2); |
| AddAndReturnOverflow(Z + 3 * i, R3); |
| AddAndReturnOverflow(Z + 4 * i, R4); |
| } |
| |
| void ProcessorImpl::MultiplyToomCook(RWDigits Z, Digits X, Digits Y) { |
| DCHECK(X.len() >= Y.len()); |
| int k = Y.len(); |
| // TODO(jkummerow): Would it be a measurable improvement to share the |
| // scratch memory for several invocations? |
| Digits X0(X, 0, k); |
| Toom3Main(Z, X0, Y); |
| if (X.len() > Y.len()) { |
| ScratchDigits T(2 * k); |
| for (int i = k; i < X.len(); i += k) { |
| Digits Xi(X, i, k); |
| // TODO(jkummerow): would it be a measurable improvement to craft a |
| // "ToomChunk" method in the style of {KaratsubaChunk}? |
| Toom3Main(T, Xi, Y); |
| AddAndReturnOverflow(Z + i, T); // Can't overflow. |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| } // namespace bigint |
| } // namespace v8 |