| This component provides a named system lock that allows for synchronization |
| across multiple processes without relying on lockfiles. Linux, MacOS, and |
| Windows are supported. |
| |
| ## Example usage |
| |
| ## Implementation |
| |
| The lock is implemented per platform: |
| |
| * Linux - As a pthread mutex. |
| * MacOS - Using `bootstrap_check_in()`, interpreting ownership of receive rights |
| on a Mach service name as ownership of a lock. |
| * Windows - As a kernel mutex. |
| |
| ### Linux-specific notes |
| |
| The lock is implemented using a pthread mutex in shared memory. Contenders |
| attempt to open a POSIX shared memory object, creating the object if it does not |
| exist. The mutex is configured with the `PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST` attribute to |
| ensure that it remains recoverable if the process holding the lock exits |
| abnormally. |
| |
| Due to the nature of the `shm_unlink` system call, it is impossible for any |
| contending process to determine if it is safe to destroy the shared memory |
| object. Consider the following sequence of processes A, B, and C: |
| |
| 1. A: Shared memory foo does not exist. Create the shared memory object. |
| 1. A: Creates and acquires the mutex lock in shared memory. |
| 1. B: Shared memory foo exists. Open the existing shared memory object. |
| 1. A: Release the mutex lock and shm_unlink “foo”. Note: Process B can still use |
| the shared memory until it closes it. Future attempts to open foo will fail with |
| ENOENT. foo can be recreated. |
| 1. C: Shared memory foo does not exist. Create the shared memory object. |
| 1. B: Acquire the mutex lock in shared memory. |
| 1. C: Creates and acquires the mutex lock in shared memory. |
| |
| In the sequence above, unlinking the shared memory created a situation in which |
| processes B and C hold the lock simultaneously. Thus, by design, the lock uses a |
| leaky mutex in shared memory. The leak occurs once per named lock and is around |
| 40 bytes. |