| ;; NOTE: Assertions have been generated by update_lit_checks.py --all-items and should not be edited. | |
| ;; RUN: foreach %s %t wasm-opt -all --licm -S -o - | filecheck %s | |
| (module | |
| (memory 10 20) | |
| ;; CHECK: (type $0 (func (param i32))) | |
| ;; CHECK: (type $1 (func (param i32) (result i32))) | |
| ;; CHECK: (type $2 (func)) | |
| ;; CHECK: (memory $0 10 20) | |
| ;; CHECK: (func $unreachable-get (type $2) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local $x i32) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (drop | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local.get $x) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (loop $loop | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (unreachable) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (nop) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| (func $unreachable-get | |
| (local $x i32) | |
| (loop $loop | |
| (unreachable) | |
| ;; This loop is unreachable. We should not error on handling it (because it | |
| ;; is unreachable it does not have a basic block, which the analysis uses). | |
| ;; In this case it is fine to move it out of the loop (though it does not | |
| ;; really help much). | |
| (drop | |
| (local.get $x) | |
| ) | |
| ) | |
| ) | |
| ;; CHECK: (func $unreachable-get-call (type $0) (param $p i32) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local $x i32) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (loop $loop | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (unreachable) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (call $unreachable-get-call | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local.get $x) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| (func $unreachable-get-call (param $p i32) | |
| (local $x i32) | |
| ;; As above, but now the get is in a call. We cannot move the call out, as it | |
| ;; may have side effects. | |
| (loop $loop | |
| (unreachable) | |
| (call $unreachable-get-call | |
| (local.get $x) | |
| ) | |
| ) | |
| ) | |
| ;; CHECK: (func $unreachable-get-store (type $0) (param $p i32) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local $x i32) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (loop $loop | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (unreachable) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (i32.store | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local.get $x) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (i32.const 10) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| (func $unreachable-get-store (param $p i32) | |
| (local $x i32) | |
| ;; As above, but now the get is stored. This is a different effect than the | |
| ;; call in the function before us, and it too cannot be moved. | |
| (loop $loop | |
| (unreachable) | |
| (i32.store | |
| (local.get $x) | |
| (i32.const 10) | |
| ) | |
| ) | |
| ) | |
| ;; CHECK: (func $pause (type $0) (param $p i32) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (drop | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (i32.const 0) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (loop $loop | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (nop) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (pause) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (drop | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (i32.const 1) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (br $loop) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| (func $pause (param $p i32) | |
| ;; We don't want pause to be moved out of loops. In principle we should be | |
| ;; able to move side-effect-free expressions back before the pause, but we | |
| ;; currently do not. Pause is rare and specialized enough that this shouldn't | |
| ;; be a problem. | |
| (loop $loop | |
| (drop (i32.const 0)) | |
| (pause) | |
| (drop (i32.const 1)) | |
| (br $loop) | |
| ) | |
| ) | |
| ;; CHECK: (func $bug-inversion (type $1) (param $z i32) (result i32) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local $x i32) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local $y i32) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local.set $y | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (i32.const 0) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local.set $x | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (i32.const 0) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (loop $loop | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local.set $y | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (i32.const 2) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local.set $x | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (i32.add | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local.get $y) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (i32.const 1) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (br_if $loop | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (i32.const 0) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local.get $x) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| (func $bug-inversion (param $z i32) (result i32) | |
| (local $x i32) | |
| (local $y i32) | |
| (local.set $y (i32.const 0)) | |
| (local.set $x (i32.const 0)) | |
| (loop $loop | |
| (local.set $y (i32.const 2)) | |
| (local.set $x (i32.add (local.get $y) (i32.const 1))) | |
| (br_if $loop (i32.const 0)) | |
| ) | |
| (local.get $x) | |
| ) | |
| ;; CHECK: (func $bug-cross-statement-dependency (type $1) (param $z i32) (result i32) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local $x i32) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local $y i32) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local.set $x | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (i32.const 0) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local.set $y | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (i32.const 0) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (loop $loop | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local.set $y | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local.get $x) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local.set $x | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (i32.add | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local.get $z) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (i32.const 1) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (br_if $loop | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (i32.const 0) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: (local.get $y) | |
| ;; CHECK-NEXT: ) | |
| (func $bug-cross-statement-dependency (param $z i32) (result i32) | |
| (local $x i32) | |
| (local $y i32) | |
| (local.set $x (i32.const 0)) | |
| (local.set $y (i32.const 0)) | |
| (loop $loop | |
| (local.set $y (local.get $x)) | |
| (local.set $x (i32.add (local.get $z) (i32.const 1))) | |
| (br_if $loop (i32.const 0)) | |
| ) | |
| (local.get $y) | |
| ) | |
| ) |