| <HTML> | |
| <HEAD><TITLE>APR Design Document</TITLE></HEAD> | |
| <BODY> | |
| <h1>Design of APR</h1> | |
| <p>The Apache Portable Run-time libraries have been designed to provide a common | |
| interface to low level routines across any platform. The original goal of APR | |
| was to combine all code in Apache to one common code base. This is not the | |
| correct approach however, so the goal of APR has changed. There are places | |
| where common code is not a good thing. For example, how to map requests | |
| to either threads or processes should be platform specific. APR's place | |
| is now to combine any code that can be safely combined without sacrificing | |
| performance.</p> | |
| <p>To this end we have created a set of operations that are required for cross | |
| platform development. There may be other types that are desired and those | |
| will be implemented in the future.</p> | |
| <p>This document will discuss the structure of APR, and how best to contribute | |
| code to the effort.</p> | |
| <h2>APR On Windows and Netware</h2> | |
| <p>APR on Windows and Netware is different from APR on all other systems, | |
| because those platforms don't use autoconf. On Unix, apr_private.h (private to | |
| APR) and apr.h (public, used by applications that use APR) are generated by | |
| autoconf from acconfig.h and apr.h.in respectively. On Windows (and Netware), | |
| apr_private.h and apr.h are created from apr_private.hw (apr_private.hwn) | |
| and apr.hw (apr.hwn) respectively.</p> | |
| <p> <strong> | |
| If you add code to acconfig.h or tests to configure.in or aclocal.m4, | |
| please give some thought to whether or not Windows and Netware need | |
| these additions as well. A general rule of thumb, is that if it is | |
| a feature macro, such as APR_HAS_THREADS, Windows and Netware need it. | |
| In other words, if the definition is going to be used in a public APR | |
| header file, such as apr_general.h, Windows needs it. | |
| The only time it is safe to add a macro or test without also adding | |
| the macro to apr*.h[n]w, is if the macro tells APR how to build. For | |
| example, a test for a header file does not need to be added to Windows. | |
| </strong></p> | |
| <h2>APR Features</h2> | |
| <p>One of the goals of APR is to provide a common set of features across all | |
| platforms. This is an admirable goal, it is also not realistic. We cannot | |
| expect to be able to implement ALL features on ALL platforms. So we are | |
| going to do the next best thing. Provide a common interface to ALL APR | |
| features on MOST platforms.</p> | |
| <p>APR developers should create FEATURE MACROS for any feature that is not | |
| available on ALL platforms. This should be a simple definition which has | |
| the form:</p> | |
| <code>APR_HAS_FEATURE</code> | |
| <p>This macro should evaluate to true if APR has this feature on this platform. | |
| For example, Linux and Windows have mmap'ed files, and APR is providing an | |
| interface for mmapp'ing a file. On both Linux and Windows, APR_HAS_MMAP | |
| should evaluate to one, and the ap_mmap_* functions should map files into | |
| memory and return the appropriate status codes.</p> | |
| <p>If your OS of choice does not have mmap'ed files, APR_HAS_MMAP should | |
| evaluate to zero, and all ap_mmap_* functions should not be defined. The | |
| second step is a precaution that will allow us to break at compile time if a | |
| programmer tries to use unsupported functions.</p> | |
| <h2>APR types</h2> | |
| <p>The base types in APR</p> | |
| <ul> | |
| <li>dso<br> | |
| Shared library routines | |
| <li>mmap<br> | |
| Memory-mapped files | |
| <li>poll<br> | |
| Polling I/O | |
| <li>time<br> | |
| Time | |
| <li>user<br> | |
| Users and groups | |
| <li>locks<br> | |
| Process and thread locks (critical sections) | |
| <li>shmem<br> | |
| Shared memory | |
| <li>file_io<br> | |
| File I/O, including pipes | |
| <li>atomic<br> | |
| Atomic integer operations | |
| <li>strings<br> | |
| String handling routines | |
| <li>memory<br> | |
| Pool-based memory allocation | |
| <li>passwd<br> | |
| Reading passwords from the terminal | |
| <li>tables<br> | |
| Tables and hashes | |
| <li>network_io<br> | |
| Network I/O | |
| <li>threadproc<br> | |
| Threads and processes | |
| <li>misc<br> | |
| Any APR type which doesn't have any other place to belong. This | |
| should be used sparingly. | |
| <li>support<br> | |
| Functions meant to be used across multiple APR types. This area | |
| is for internal functions only. If a function is exposed, it should | |
| not be put here. | |
| </ul> | |
| <h2>Directory Structure</h2> | |
| <p>Each type has a base directory. Inside this base directory, are | |
| subdirectories, which contain the actual code. These subdirectories are named | |
| after the platforms the are compiled on. Unix is also used as a common | |
| directory. If the code you are writing is POSIX based, you should look at the | |
| code in the unix directory. A good rule of thumb, is that if more than half | |
| your code needs to be ifdef'ed out, and the structures required for your code | |
| are substantively different from the POSIX code, you should create a new | |
| directory.</p> | |
| <p>Currently, the APR code is written for Unix, BeOS, Windows, and OS/2. An | |
| example of the directory structure is the file I/O directory:</p> | |
| <pre> | |
| apr | |
| | | |
| -> file_io | |
| | | |
| -> unix The Unix and common base code | |
| | | |
| -> win32 The Windows code | |
| | | |
| -> os2 The OS/2 code | |
| </pre> | |
| <p>Obviously, BeOS does not have a directory. This is because BeOS is currently | |
| using the Unix directory for it's file_io.</p> | |
| <p>There are a few special top level directories. These are test and include. | |
| Test is a directory which stores all test programs. It is expected | |
| that if a new type is developed, there will also be a new test program, to | |
| help people port this new type to different platforms. A small document | |
| describing how to create new tests that integrate with the test suite can be | |
| found in the test/ directory. Include is a directory which stores all | |
| required APR header files for external use.</p> | |
| <h2>Creating an APR Type</h2> | |
| <p>The current design of APR requires that most APR types be incomplete. | |
| It is not possible to write flexible portable code if programs can access | |
| the internals of APR types. This is because different platforms are | |
| likely to define different native types. There are only two exceptions to | |
| this rule:</p> | |
| <ul> | |
| <li>The first exception to this rule is if the type can only reasonably be | |
| implemented one way. For example, time is a complete type because there | |
| is only one reasonable time implementation. | |
| <li>The second exception to the incomplete type rule can be found in | |
| apr_portable.h. This file defines the native types for each platform. | |
| Using these types, it is possible to extract native types for any APR type.</p> | |
| </ul> | |
| <p>For this reason, each platform defines a structure in their own directories. | |
| Those structures are then typedef'ed in an external header file. For example | |
| in file_io/unix/fileio.h:</p> | |
| <pre> | |
| struct ap_file_t { | |
| apr_pool_t *cntxt; | |
| int filedes; | |
| FILE *filehand; | |
| ... | |
| } | |
| </pre> | |
| <p>In include/apr_file_io.h:</p> | |
| </pre> | |
| typedef struct ap_file_t ap_file_t; | |
| </pre> | |
| <p> This will cause a compiler error if somebody tries to access the filedes | |
| field in this structure. Windows does not have a filedes field, so obviously, | |
| it is important that programs not be able to access these.</p> | |
| <p>You may notice the apr_pool_t field. Most APR types have this field. This | |
| type is used to allocate memory within APR. Because every APR type has a pool, | |
| any APR function can allocate memory if it needs to. This is very important | |
| and it is one of the reasons that APR works. If you create a new type, you | |
| must add a pool to it. If you do not, then all functions that operate on that | |
| type will need a pool argument.</p> | |
| <h2>New Function</h2> | |
| <p>When creating a new function, please try to adhere to these rules.</p> | |
| <ul> | |
| <li> Result arguments should be the first arguments. | |
| <li> If a function needs a pool, it should be the last argument. | |
| <li> These rules are flexible, especially if it makes the code easier | |
| to understand because it mimics a standard function. | |
| </ul> | |
| <h2>Documentation</h2> | |
| <p>Whenever a new function is added to APR, it MUST be documented. New | |
| functions will not be committed unless there are docs to go along with them. | |
| The documentation should be a comment block above the function in the header | |
| file.</p> | |
| <p>The format for the comment block is:</p> | |
| <pre> | |
| /** | |
| * Brief description of the function | |
| * @param parma_1_name explanation | |
| * @param parma_2_name explanation | |
| * @param parma_n_name explanation | |
| * @tip Any extra information people should know. | |
| * @deffunc function prototype if required | |
| */ | |
| </pre> | |
| <p>For an actual example, look at any file in the include directory. The | |
| reason the docs are in the header files is to ensure that the docs always | |
| reflect the current code. If you change parameters or return values for a | |
| function, please be sure to update the documentation.</p> | |
| <h2>APR Error reporting</h2> | |
| <p>Most APR functions should return an ap_status_t type. The only time an | |
| APR function does not return an ap_status_t is if it absolutely CAN NOT | |
| fail. Examples of this would be filling out an array when you know you are | |
| not beyond the array's range. If it cannot fail on your platform, but it | |
| could conceivably fail on another platform, it should return an ap_status_t. | |
| Unless you are sure, return an ap_status_t.</p> | |
| <strong> | |
| This includes functions that return TRUE/FALSE values. How that | |
| is handled is discussed below | |
| </strong> | |
| <p>All platforms return errno values unchanged. Each platform can also have | |
| one system error type, which can be returned after an offset is added. | |
| There are five types of error values in APR, each with its own offset.</p> | |
| <!-- This should be turned into a table, but I am lazy today --> | |
| <pre> | |
| Name Purpose | |
| 0) This is 0 for all platforms and isn't really defined | |
| anywhere, but it is the offset for errno values. | |
| (This has no name because it isn't actually defined, | |
| but for completeness we are discussing it here). | |
| 1) APR_OS_START_ERROR This is platform dependent, and is the offset at which | |
| APR errors start to be defined. Error values are | |
| defined as anything which caused the APR function to | |
| fail. APR errors in this range should be named | |
| APR_E* (i.e. APR_ENOSOCKET) | |
| 2) APR_OS_START_STATUS This is platform dependent, and is the offset at which | |
| APR status values start. Status values do not indicate | |
| success or failure, and should be returned if | |
| APR_SUCCESS does not make sense. APR status codes in | |
| this range should be name APR_* (i.e. APR_DETACH) | |
| 4) APR_OS_START_USEERR This is platform dependent, and is the offset at which | |
| APR apps can begin to add their own error codes. | |
| 3) APR_OS_START_SYSERR This is platform dependent, and is the offset at which | |
| system error values begin. | |
| </pre> | |
| <strong>The difference in naming between APR_OS_START_ERROR and | |
| APR_OS_START_STATUS mentioned above allows programmers to easily determine if | |
| the error code indicates an error condition or a status condition.</strong> | |
| <p>If your function has multiple return codes that all indicate success, but | |
| with different results, or if your function can only return PASS/FAIL, you | |
| should still return an apr_status_t. In the first case, define one | |
| APR status code for each return value, an example of this is | |
| <code>apr_proc_wait</code>, which can only return APR_CHILDDONE, | |
| APR_CHILDNOTDONE, or an error code. In the second case, please return | |
| APR_SUCCESS for PASS, and define a new APR status code for failure, an | |
| example of this is <code>apr_compare_users</code>, which can only return | |
| APR_SUCCESS, APR_EMISMATCH, or an error code.</p> | |
| <p>All of these definitions can be found in apr_errno.h for all platforms. When | |
| an error occurs in an APR function, the function must return an error code. | |
| If the error occurred in a system call and that system call uses errno to | |
| report an error, then the code is returned unchanged. For example: </p> | |
| <pre> | |
| if (open(fname, oflags, 0777) < 0) | |
| return errno; | |
| </pre> | |
| <p>The next place an error can occur is a system call that uses some error value | |
| other than the primary error value on a platform. This can also be handled | |
| by APR applications. For example:</p> | |
| <pre> | |
| if (CreateFile(fname, oflags, sharemod, NULL, | |
| createflags, attributes, 0) == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE | |
| return (GetLAstError() + APR_OS_START_SYSERR); | |
| </pre> | |
| <p>These two examples implement the same function for two different platforms. | |
| Obviously even if the underlying problem is the same on both platforms, this | |
| will result in two different error codes being returned. This is OKAY, and | |
| is correct for APR. APR relies on the fact that most of the time an error | |
| occurs, the program logs the error and continues, it does not try to | |
| programatically solve the problem. This does not mean we have not provided | |
| support for programmatically solving the problem, it just isn't the default | |
| case. We'll get to how this problem is solved in a little while.</p> | |
| <p>If the error occurs in an APR function but it is not due to a system call, | |
| but it is actually an APR error or just a status code from APR, then the | |
| appropriate code should be returned. These codes are defined in apr_errno.h | |
| and should be self explanatory.</p> | |
| <p>No APR code should ever return a code between APR_OS_START_USEERR and | |
| APR_OS_START_SYSERR, those codes are reserved for APR applications.</p> | |
| <p>To programmatically correct an error in a running application, the error | |
| codes need to be consistent across platforms. This should make sense. APR | |
| has provided macros to test for status code equivalency. For example, to | |
| determine if the code that you received from the APR function means EOF, you | |
| would use the macro APR_STATUS_IS_EOF().</p> | |
| <p>Why did APR take this approach? There are two ways to deal with error | |
| codes portably.</p> | |
| <ol type=1> | |
| <li> Return the same error code across all platforms. | |
| <li> Return platform specific error codes and convert them when necessary. | |
| </ol> | |
| <p>The problem with option number one is that it takes time to convert error | |
| codes to a common code, and most of the time programs want to just output | |
| an error string. If we convert all errors to a common subset, we have four | |
| steps to output an error string:</p> | |
| <p>The second problem with option 1, is that it is a lossy conversion. For | |
| example, Windows and OS/2 have a couple hundred error codes, but POSIX errno | |
| only defines about 50 errno values. This means that if we convert to a | |
| canonical error value immediately, there is no way for the programmer to | |
| get the actual system error.</p> | |
| <pre> | |
| make syscall that fails | |
| convert to common error code step 1 | |
| return common error code | |
| check for success | |
| call error output function step 2 | |
| convert back to system error step 3 | |
| output error string step 4 | |
| </pre> | |
| <p>By keeping the errors platform specific, we can output error strings in two | |
| steps.</p> | |
| <pre> | |
| make syscall that fails | |
| return error code | |
| check for success | |
| call error output function step 1 | |
| output error string step 2 | |
| </pre> | |
| <p>Less often, programs change their execution based on what error was returned. | |
| This is no more expensive using option 2 than it is using option 1, but we | |
| put the onus of converting the error code on the programmer themselves. | |
| For example, using option 1:</p> | |
| <pre> | |
| make syscall that fails | |
| convert to common error code | |
| return common error code | |
| decide execution based on common error code | |
| </pre> | |
| <p>Using option 2:</p> | |
| <pre> | |
| make syscall that fails | |
| return error code | |
| convert to common error code (using ap_canonical_error) | |
| decide execution based on common error code | |
| </pre> | |
| <p>Finally, there is one more operation on error codes. You can get a string | |
| that explains in human readable form what has happened. To do this using | |
| APR, call ap_strerror().</p> | |