blob: 21fd37f0aa5e006cda6f4155b269603ce6aea415 [file] [log] [blame]
// Copyright (c) 2010 The Chromium Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
// found in the LICENSE file.
#include "chrome/browser/safe_browsing/safe_browsing_store.h"
namespace {
// Find items matching between |subs| and |adds|, and remove them,
// recording the item from |adds| in |adds_removed|. To minimize
// copies, the inputs are processing in parallel, so |subs| and |adds|
// should be compatibly ordered (either by SBAddPrefixLess or
// SBAddPrefixHashLess).
//
// |predAS| provides add < sub, |predSA| provides sub < add, for the
// tightest compare appropriate (see calls in SBProcessSubs).
template <class S, class A, typename PredAS, typename PredSA>
void KnockoutSubs(std::vector<S>* subs,
std::vector<A>* adds,
PredAS predAS, PredSA predSA,
std::vector<A>* adds_removed) {
// Keep a pair of output iterators for writing kept items. Due to
// deletions, these may lag the main iterators. Using erase() on
// individual items would result in O(N^2) copies. Using std::list
// would work around that, at double or triple the memory cost.
typename std::vector<A>::iterator add_out = adds->begin();
typename std::vector<S>::iterator sub_out = subs->begin();
// Current location in vectors.
// TODO(shess): I want these to be const_iterator, but then
// std::copy() gets confused. Could snag a const_iterator add_end,
// or write an inline std::copy(), but it seems like I'm doing
// something wrong.
typename std::vector<A>::iterator add_iter = adds->begin();
typename std::vector<S>::iterator sub_iter = subs->begin();
while (add_iter != adds->end() && sub_iter != subs->end()) {
// If |*sub_iter| < |*add_iter|, retain the sub.
if (predSA(*sub_iter, *add_iter)) {
*sub_out = *sub_iter;
++sub_out;
++sub_iter;
// If |*add_iter| < |*sub_iter|, retain the add.
} else if (predAS(*add_iter, *sub_iter)) {
*add_out = *add_iter;
++add_out;
++add_iter;
// Record equal items and drop them.
} else {
adds_removed->push_back(*add_iter);
++add_iter;
++sub_iter;
}
}
// Erase any leftover gap.
adds->erase(add_out, add_iter);
subs->erase(sub_out, sub_iter);
}
// Remove items in |removes| from |full_hashes|. |full_hashes| and
// |removes| should be ordered by SBAddPrefix component.
template <class T>
void RemoveMatchingPrefixes(const std::vector<SBAddPrefix>& removes,
std::vector<T>* full_hashes) {
// This is basically an inline of std::set_difference().
// Unfortunately, that algorithm requires that the two iterator
// pairs use the same value types.
// Where to store kept items.
typename std::vector<T>::iterator out = full_hashes->begin();
typename std::vector<T>::iterator hash_iter = full_hashes->begin();
std::vector<SBAddPrefix>::const_iterator remove_iter = removes.begin();
while (hash_iter != full_hashes->end() && remove_iter != removes.end()) {
// Keep items less than |*remove_iter|.
if (SBAddPrefixLess(*hash_iter, *remove_iter)) {
*out = *hash_iter;
++out;
++hash_iter;
// No hit for |*remove_iter|, bump it forward.
} else if (SBAddPrefixLess(*remove_iter, *hash_iter)) {
++remove_iter;
// Drop equal items, there may be multiple hits.
} else {
do {
++hash_iter;
} while (hash_iter != full_hashes->end() &&
!SBAddPrefixLess(*remove_iter, *hash_iter));
++remove_iter;
}
}
// Erase any leftover gap.
full_hashes->erase(out, hash_iter);
}
} // namespace
void SBProcessSubs(std::vector<SBAddPrefix>* add_prefixes,
std::vector<SBSubPrefix>* sub_prefixes,
std::vector<SBAddFullHash>* add_full_hashes,
std::vector<SBSubFullHash>* sub_full_hashes) {
// It is possible to structure templates and template
// specializations such that the following calls work without having
// to qualify things. It becomes very arbitrary, though, and less
// clear how things are working.
// Sort the inputs by the SBAddPrefix bits.
std::sort(add_prefixes->begin(), add_prefixes->end(),
SBAddPrefixLess<SBAddPrefix,SBAddPrefix>);
std::sort(sub_prefixes->begin(), sub_prefixes->end(),
SBAddPrefixLess<SBSubPrefix,SBSubPrefix>);
std::sort(add_full_hashes->begin(), add_full_hashes->end(),
SBAddPrefixHashLess<SBAddFullHash,SBAddFullHash>);
std::sort(sub_full_hashes->begin(), sub_full_hashes->end(),
SBAddPrefixHashLess<SBSubFullHash,SBSubFullHash>);
// Factor out the prefix subs.
std::vector<SBAddPrefix> removed_adds;
KnockoutSubs(sub_prefixes, add_prefixes,
SBAddPrefixLess<SBAddPrefix,SBSubPrefix>,
SBAddPrefixLess<SBSubPrefix,SBAddPrefix>,
&removed_adds);
// Remove the full-hashes corrosponding to the adds which
// KnockoutSubs() removed. Processing these w/in KnockoutSubs()
// would make the code more complicated, and they are very small
// relative to the prefix lists so the gain would be modest.
RemoveMatchingPrefixes(removed_adds, add_full_hashes);
RemoveMatchingPrefixes(removed_adds, sub_full_hashes);
// TODO(shess): AFAICT this pass is not done on the trunk. I
// believe that's a bug, but it may not matter because full-hash
// subs almost never happen (I think you'd need multiple collisions
// where one of the sites stopped being flagged?). Enable this once
// everything is in. [if(0) instead of #ifdef 0 to make sure it
// compiles.]
if (0) {
// Factor out the full-hash subs.
std::vector<SBAddFullHash> removed_full_adds;
KnockoutSubs(sub_full_hashes, add_full_hashes,
SBAddPrefixHashLess<SBAddFullHash,SBSubFullHash>,
SBAddPrefixHashLess<SBSubFullHash,SBAddFullHash>,
&removed_full_adds);
}
}