Google Git
Sign in
chromium / chromium / src / e57486c901b4616d7c883b10249e2a625475fcd7 / . / PRESUBMIT_test.py
blob: 659c6324dc14931c1a99d061cb5bdd7c5ed96582 [file] [log] [blame]
#!/usr/bin/env vpython3
# Copyright 2012 The Chromium Authors
# Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
# found in the LICENSE file.
import io
import os.path
import subprocess
import textwrap
import unittest
import PRESUBMIT
from PRESUBMIT_test_mocks import MockFile, MockAffectedFile
from PRESUBMIT_test_mocks import MockInputApi, MockOutputApi
_TEST_DATA_DIR = 'base/test/data/presubmit'
class VersionControlConflictsTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testTypicalConflict(self):
lines = [
'<<<<<<< HEAD', ' base::ScopedTempDir temp_dir_;', '=======',
' ScopedTempDir temp_dir_;', '>>>>>>> master'
]
errors = PRESUBMIT._CheckForVersionControlConflictsInFile(
MockInputApi(), MockFile('some/path/foo_platform.cc', lines))
self.assertEqual(3, len(errors))
self.assertTrue('1' in errors[0])
self.assertTrue('3' in errors[1])
self.assertTrue('5' in errors[2])
def testIgnoresReadmes(self):
lines = [
'A First Level Header', '====================', '',
'A Second Level Header', '---------------------'
]
errors = PRESUBMIT._CheckForVersionControlConflictsInFile(
MockInputApi(), MockFile('some/polymer/README.md', lines))
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
class BadExtensionsTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testBadRejFile(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('some/path/foo.cc', ''),
MockFile('some/path/foo.cc.rej', ''),
MockFile('some/path2/bar.h.rej', ''),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckPatchFiles(mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual(2, len(results[0].items))
self.assertTrue('foo.cc.rej' in results[0].items[0])
self.assertTrue('bar.h.rej' in results[0].items[1])
def testBadOrigFile(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('other/path/qux.h.orig', ''),
MockFile('other/path/qux.h', ''),
MockFile('other/path/qux.cc', ''),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckPatchFiles(mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual(1, len(results[0].items))
self.assertTrue('qux.h.orig' in results[0].items[0])
def testGoodFiles(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('other/path/qux.h', ''),
MockFile('other/path/qux.cc', ''),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckPatchFiles(mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
class CheckForSuperfluousStlIncludesInHeadersTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testGoodFiles(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
# The check is not smart enough to figure out which definitions correspond
# to which header.
MockFile('other/path/foo.h', ['#include <string>', 'std::vector']),
# The check is not smart enough to do IWYU.
MockFile('other/path/bar.h',
['#include "base/check.h"', 'std::vector']),
MockFile('other/path/qux.h',
['#include "base/stl_util.h"', 'foobar']),
MockFile('other/path/baz.h',
['#include "set/vector.h"', 'bazzab']),
# The check is only for header files.
MockFile('other/path/not_checked.cc',
['#include <vector>', 'bazbaz']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckForSuperfluousStlIncludesInHeaders(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
def testBadFiles(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('other/path/foo.h', ['#include <vector>', 'vector']),
MockFile(
'other/path/bar.h',
['#include <limits>', '#include <set>', 'no_std_namespace']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckForSuperfluousStlIncludesInHeaders(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertTrue('foo.h: Includes STL' in results[0].message)
self.assertTrue('bar.h: Includes STL' in results[0].message)
class CheckSingletonInHeadersTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testSingletonInArbitraryHeader(self):
diff_singleton_h = [
'base::subtle::AtomicWord '
'base::Singleton<Type, Traits, DifferentiatingType>::'
]
diff_foo_h = [
'// base::Singleton<Foo> in comment.',
'friend class base::Singleton<Foo>'
]
diff_foo2_h = [' //Foo* bar = base::Singleton<Foo>::get();']
diff_bad_h = ['Foo* foo = base::Singleton<Foo>::get();']
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('base/memory/singleton.h', diff_singleton_h),
MockAffectedFile('foo.h', diff_foo_h),
MockAffectedFile('foo2.h', diff_foo2_h),
MockAffectedFile('bad.h', diff_bad_h)
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckSingletonInHeaders(mock_input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings[0].items))
self.assertEqual('error', warnings[0].type)
self.assertTrue('Found base::Singleton<T>' in warnings[0].message)
def testSingletonInCC(self):
diff_cc = ['Foo* foo = base::Singleton<Foo>::get();']
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [MockAffectedFile('some/path/foo.cc', diff_cc)]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckSingletonInHeaders(mock_input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
class DeprecatedOSMacroNamesTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testDeprecatedOSMacroNames(self):
lines = [
'#if defined(OS_WIN)', ' #elif defined(OS_WINDOW)',
' # if defined(OS_MAC) || defined(OS_CHROME)'
]
errors = PRESUBMIT._CheckForDeprecatedOSMacrosInFile(
MockInputApi(), MockFile('some/path/foo_platform.cc', lines))
self.assertEqual(len(lines) + 1, len(errors))
self.assertTrue(
':1: defined(OS_WIN) -> BUILDFLAG(IS_WIN)' in errors[0])
class InvalidIfDefinedMacroNamesTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testInvalidIfDefinedMacroNames(self):
lines = [
'#if defined(TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR)',
'#if !defined(TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR)',
'#elif defined(TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR)',
'#ifdef TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR',
' # ifdef TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR',
'# if defined(VALID) || defined(TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR)',
'# else // defined(TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR)',
'#endif // defined(TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR)'
]
errors = PRESUBMIT._CheckForInvalidIfDefinedMacrosInFile(
MockInputApi(), MockFile('some/path/source.mm', lines))
self.assertEqual(len(lines), len(errors))
def testValidIfDefinedMacroNames(self):
lines = [
'#if defined(FOO)', '#ifdef BAR', '#if TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR'
]
errors = PRESUBMIT._CheckForInvalidIfDefinedMacrosInFile(
MockInputApi(), MockFile('some/path/source.cc', lines))
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
class CheckNoUNIT_TESTInSourceFilesTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testUnitTestMacros(self):
lines = [
'#if defined(UNIT_TEST)', '#if defined UNIT_TEST',
'#if !defined(UNIT_TEST)', '#elif defined(UNIT_TEST)',
'#ifdef UNIT_TEST', ' # ifdef UNIT_TEST', '#ifndef UNIT_TEST',
'# if defined(VALID) || defined(UNIT_TEST)',
'# if defined(UNIT_TEST) && defined(VALID)',
'# else // defined(UNIT_TEST)', '#endif // defined(UNIT_TEST)'
]
errors = PRESUBMIT._CheckNoUNIT_TESTInSourceFiles(
MockInputApi(), MockFile('some/path/source.cc', lines))
self.assertEqual(len(lines), len(errors))
def testNotUnitTestMacros(self):
lines = [
'// Comment about "#if defined(UNIT_TEST)"',
'/* Comment about #if defined(UNIT_TEST)" */',
'#ifndef UNIT_TEST_H', '#define UNIT_TEST_H',
'#ifndef TEST_UNIT_TEST', '#define TEST_UNIT_TEST',
'#if defined(_UNIT_TEST)', '#if defined(UNIT_TEST_)',
'#ifdef _UNIT_TEST', '#ifdef UNIT_TEST_', '#ifndef _UNIT_TEST',
'#ifndef UNIT_TEST_'
]
errors = PRESUBMIT._CheckNoUNIT_TESTInSourceFiles(
MockInputApi(), MockFile('some/path/source.cc', lines))
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
class CheckEachPerfettoTestDataFileHasDepsEntry(unittest.TestCase):
def testNewSha256FileNoDEPS(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('base/tracing/test/data_sha256/new.pftrace.sha256', []),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckEachPerfettoTestDataFileHasDepsEntry(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(
('You must update the DEPS file when you update a .sha256 file '
'in base/tracing/test/data_sha256'), results[0].message)
def testNewSha256FileSuccess(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
new_deps = """deps = {
'src/base/tracing/test/data': {
'bucket': 'perfetto',
'objects': [
{
'object_name': 'test_data/new.pftrace-a1b2c3f4',
'sha256sum': 'a1b2c3f4',
'size_bytes': 1,
'generation': 1,
'output_file': 'new.pftrace'
},
],
'dep_type': 'gcs'
},
}""".splitlines()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('base/tracing/test/data_sha256/new.pftrace.sha256',
['a1b2c3f4']),
MockFile('DEPS', new_deps,
["deps={'src/base/tracing/test/data':{}}"]),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckEachPerfettoTestDataFileHasDepsEntry(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
def testNewSha256FileWrongSha256(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
new_deps = """deps = {
'src/base/tracing/test/data': {
'bucket': 'perfetto',
'objects': [
{
'object_name': 'test_data/new.pftrace-a1b2c3f4',
'sha256sum': 'wrong_hash',
'size_bytes': 1,
'generation': 1,
'output_file': 'new.pftrace'
},
],
'dep_type': 'gcs'
},
}""".splitlines()
f = MockFile('base/tracing/test/data_sha256/new.pftrace.sha256',
['a1b2c3f4'])
input_api.files = [
f,
MockFile('DEPS', new_deps,
["deps={'src/base/tracing/test/data':{}}"]),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckEachPerfettoTestDataFileHasDepsEntry(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(
('No corresponding DEPS entry found for %s. '
'Run `base/tracing/test/test_data.py get_deps --filepath %s` '
'to generate the DEPS entry.' % (f.LocalPath(), f.LocalPath())),
results[0].message)
def testDeleteSha256File(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
old_deps = """deps = {
'src/base/tracing/test/data': {
'bucket': 'perfetto',
'objects': [
{
'object_name': 'test_data/new.pftrace-a1b2c3f4',
'sha256sum': 'a1b2c3f4',
'size_bytes': 1,
'generation': 1,
'output_file': 'new.pftrace'
},
],
'dep_type': 'gcs'
},
}""".splitlines()
f = MockFile('base/tracing/test/data_sha256/new.pftrace.sha256', [],
['a1b2c3f4'],
action='D')
input_api.files = [
f,
MockFile('DEPS', old_deps, old_deps),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckEachPerfettoTestDataFileHasDepsEntry(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual((
'You deleted %s so you must also remove the corresponding DEPS entry.'
% f.LocalPath()), results[0].message)
def testDeleteSha256Success(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
new_deps = """deps = {
'src/base/tracing/test/data': {
'bucket': 'perfetto',
'objects': [],
'dep_type': 'gcs'
},
}""".splitlines()
old_deps = """deps = {
'src/base/tracing/test/data': {
'bucket': 'perfetto',
'objects': [
{
'object_name': 'test_data/new.pftrace-a1b2c3f4',
'sha256sum': 'a1b2c3f4',
'size_bytes': 1,
'generation': 1,
'output_file': 'new.pftrace'
},
],
'dep_type': 'gcs'
},
}""".splitlines()
f = MockFile('base/tracing/test/data_sha256/new.pftrace.sha256', [],
['a1b2c3f4'],
action='D')
input_api.files = [
f,
MockFile('DEPS', new_deps, old_deps),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckEachPerfettoTestDataFileHasDepsEntry(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
class CheckAddedDepsHaveTestApprovalsTest(unittest.TestCase):
def setUp(self):
self.input_api = input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.environ = {}
input_api.owners_client = self.FakeOwnersClient()
input_api.gerrit = self.fakeGerrit()
input_api.change.issue = 123
self.mockOwnersAndReviewers("owner", set(["reviewer"]))
self.mockListSubmodules([])
def calculate(self, old_include_rules, old_specific_include_rules,
new_include_rules, new_specific_include_rules):
return PRESUBMIT._CalculateAddedDeps(
os.path, 'include_rules = %r\nspecific_include_rules = %r' %
(old_include_rules, old_specific_include_rules),
'include_rules = %r\nspecific_include_rules = %r' %
(new_include_rules, new_specific_include_rules))
def testCalculateAddedDeps(self):
old_include_rules = [
'+base',
'-chrome',
'+content',
'-grit',
'-grit/",',
'+jni/fooblat.h',
'!sandbox',
]
old_specific_include_rules = {
r'compositor\.*': {
'+cc',
},
}
new_include_rules = [
'-ash',
'+base',
'+chrome',
'+components',
'+content',
'+grit',
'+grit/generated_resources.h",',
'+grit/",',
'+jni/fooblat.h',
'+policy',
'+' + os.path.join('third_party', 'WebKit'),
]
new_specific_include_rules = {
r'compositor\.*': {
'+cc',
},
r'widget\.*': {
'+gpu',
},
}
expected = set([
os.path.join('chrome', 'DEPS'),
os.path.join('gpu', 'DEPS'),
os.path.join('components', 'DEPS'),
os.path.join('policy', 'DEPS'),
os.path.join('third_party', 'WebKit', 'DEPS'),
])
self.assertEqual(
expected,
self.calculate(old_include_rules, old_specific_include_rules,
new_include_rules, new_specific_include_rules))
def testCalculateAddedDepsIgnoresPermutations(self):
old_include_rules = [
'+base',
'+chrome',
]
new_include_rules = [
'+chrome',
'+base',
]
self.assertEqual(
set(), self.calculate(old_include_rules, {}, new_include_rules,
{}))
def testFindAddedDepsThatRequireReview(self):
caring = ['new_usages_require_review = True']
self.input_api.InitFiles([
MockAffectedFile('cares/DEPS', caring),
MockAffectedFile('cares/inherits/DEPS', []),
MockAffectedFile('willynilly/DEPS', []),
MockAffectedFile('willynilly/butactually/DEPS', caring),
])
expected = {
'cares': True,
'cares/sub/sub': True,
'cares/inherits': True,
'cares/inherits/sub': True,
'willynilly': False,
'willynilly/butactually': True,
'willynilly/butactually/sub': True,
}
results = PRESUBMIT._FindAddedDepsThatRequireReview(
self.input_api, set(expected))
actual = {k: k in results for k in expected}
self.assertEqual(expected, actual)
class FakeOwnersClient(object):
APPROVED = "APPROVED"
PENDING = "PENDING"
returns = {}
def ListOwners(self, *args, **kwargs):
return self.returns.get(self.ListOwners.__name__, "")
def mockListOwners(self, owners):
self.returns[self.ListOwners.__name__] = owners
def GetFilesApprovalStatus(self, *args, **kwargs):
return self.returns.get(self.GetFilesApprovalStatus.__name__, {})
def mockGetFilesApprovalStatus(self, status):
self.returns[self.GetFilesApprovalStatus.__name__] = status
def SuggestOwners(self, *args, **kwargs):
return ["eng1", "eng2", "eng3"]
class fakeGerrit(object):
def IsOwnersOverrideApproved(self, issue):
return False
def mockOwnersAndReviewers(self, owner, reviewers):
def mock(*args, **kwargs):
return [owner, reviewers]
self.input_api.canned_checks.GetCodereviewOwnerAndReviewers = mock
def mockListSubmodules(self, paths):
def mock(*args, **kwargs):
return paths
self.input_api.ListSubmodules = mock
def testApprovedAdditionalDep(self):
self.input_api.InitFiles([
MockAffectedFile('pdf/DEPS',
['include_rules=["+v8/123", "+foo/bar"]']),
MockAffectedFile('v8/DEPS', ['new_usages_require_review=True']),
# Check that we ignore "DEPS" directories. Note there are real cases
# of directories named "deps/" and, especially for case-insensitive file
# systems we should prevent these from being considered.
MockAffectedFile('foo/bar/DEPS/boofar', ['boofar file contents']),
])
# mark the additional dep as approved.
os_path = self.input_api.os_path
self.input_api.owners_client.mockGetFilesApprovalStatus(
{os_path.join('v8/123', 'DEPS'): self.FakeOwnersClient.APPROVED})
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckAddedDepsHaveTargetApprovals(
self.input_api, MockOutputApi())
# Then, the check should pass.
self.assertEqual([], results)
def testUnapprovedAdditionalDep(self):
self.input_api.InitFiles([
MockAffectedFile('pdf/DEPS', ['include_rules=["+v8/123"]']),
MockAffectedFile('v8/DEPS', ['new_usages_require_review=True']),
])
# pending.
os_path = self.input_api.os_path
self.input_api.owners_client.mockGetFilesApprovalStatus(
{os_path.join('v8/123', 'DEPS'): self.FakeOwnersClient.PENDING})
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckAddedDepsHaveTargetApprovals(
self.input_api, MockOutputApi())
# the check should fail
self.assertIn('You need LGTM', results[0].message)
self.assertIn('+v8/123', results[0].message)
# unless the added dep is from a submodule.
self.mockListSubmodules(['v8'])
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckAddedDepsHaveTargetApprovals(
self.input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual([], results)
class JSONParsingTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testSuccess(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
filename = 'valid_json.json'
contents = [
'// This is a comment.', '{', ' "key1": ["value1", "value2"],',
' "key2": 3 // This is an inline comment.', '}'
]
input_api.files = [MockFile(filename, contents)]
self.assertEqual(None,
PRESUBMIT._GetJSONParseError(input_api, filename))
def testFailure(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
test_data = [
('invalid_json_1.json', ['{ x }'], 'Expecting property name'),
('invalid_json_2.json', ['// Hello world!', '{ "hello": "world }'],
'Unterminated string starting at:'),
('invalid_json_3.json', ['{ "a": "b", "c": "d", }'],
'Expecting property name'),
('invalid_json_4.json', ['{ "a": "b" "c": "d" }'],
"Expecting ',' delimiter:"),
]
input_api.files = [
MockFile(filename, contents)
for (filename, contents, _) in test_data
]
for (filename, _, expected_error) in test_data:
actual_error = PRESUBMIT._GetJSONParseError(input_api, filename)
self.assertTrue(
expected_error in str(actual_error),
f'{filename}: "{expected_error}" not found in "{actual_error}"'
)
def testNoEatComments(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
file_with_comments = 'file_with_comments.json'
contents_with_comments = [
'// This is a comment.', '{', ' "key1": ["value1", "value2"],',
' "key2": 3 // This is an inline comment.', '}'
]
file_without_comments = 'file_without_comments.json'
contents_without_comments = [
'{', ' "key1": ["value1", "value2"],', ' "key2": 3', '}'
]
input_api.files = [
MockFile(file_with_comments, contents_with_comments),
MockFile(file_without_comments, contents_without_comments)
]
self.assertNotEqual(
None,
str(
PRESUBMIT._GetJSONParseError(input_api,
file_with_comments,
eat_comments=False)))
self.assertEqual(
None,
PRESUBMIT._GetJSONParseError(input_api,
file_without_comments,
eat_comments=False))
class IDLParsingTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testSuccess(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
filename = 'valid_idl_basics.idl'
contents = [
'// Tests a valid IDL file.', 'namespace idl_basics {',
' enum EnumType {', ' name1,', ' name2', ' };', '',
' dictionary MyType1 {', ' DOMString a;', ' };', '',
' callback Callback1 = void();',
' callback Callback2 = void(long x);',
' callback Callback3 = void(MyType1 arg);',
' callback Callback4 = void(EnumType type);', '',
' interface Functions {', ' static void function1();',
' static void function2(long x);',
' static void function3(MyType1 arg);',
' static void function4(Callback1 cb);',
' static void function5(Callback2 cb);',
' static void function6(Callback3 cb);',
' static void function7(Callback4 cb);', ' };', '',
' interface Events {', ' static void onFoo1();',
' static void onFoo2(long x);',
' static void onFoo2(MyType1 arg);',
' static void onFoo3(EnumType type);', ' };', '};'
]
input_api.files = [MockFile(filename, contents)]
self.assertEqual(None,
PRESUBMIT._GetIDLParseError(input_api, filename))
def testFailure(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
test_data = [
('invalid_idl_1.idl', [
'//', 'namespace test {', ' dictionary {', ' DOMString s;',
' };', '};'
], 'Unexpected "{" after keyword "dictionary".\n'),
# TODO(yoz): Disabled because it causes the IDL parser to hang.
# See crbug.com/363830.
# ('invalid_idl_2.idl',
# (['namespace test {',
# ' dictionary MissingSemicolon {',
# ' DOMString a',
# ' DOMString b;',
# ' };',
# '};'],
# 'Unexpected symbol DOMString after symbol a.'),
('invalid_idl_3.idl', [
'//', 'namespace test {', ' enum MissingComma {', ' name1',
' name2', ' };', '};'
], 'Unexpected symbol name2 after symbol name1.'),
('invalid_idl_4.idl', [
'//', 'namespace test {', ' enum TrailingComma {',
' name1,', ' name2,', ' };', '};'
], 'Trailing comma in block.'),
('invalid_idl_5.idl',
['//', 'namespace test {', ' callback Callback1 = void(;',
'};'], 'Unexpected ";" after "(".'),
('invalid_idl_6.idl', [
'//', 'namespace test {',
' callback Callback1 = void(long );', '};'
], 'Unexpected ")" after symbol long.'),
('invalid_idl_7.idl', [
'//', 'namespace test {', ' interace Events {',
' static void onFoo1();', ' };', '};'
], 'Unexpected symbol Events after symbol interace.'),
('invalid_idl_8.idl', [
'//', 'namespace test {', ' interface NotEvent {',
' static void onFoo1();', ' };', '};'
], 'Did not process Interface Interface(NotEvent)'),
('invalid_idl_9.idl', [
'//', 'namespace test {', ' interface {',
' static void function1();', ' };', '};'
], 'Interface missing name.'),
]
input_api.files = [
MockFile(filename, contents)
for (filename, contents, _) in test_data
]
for (filename, _, expected_error) in test_data:
actual_error = PRESUBMIT._GetIDLParseError(input_api, filename)
self.assertTrue(
expected_error in str(actual_error),
"'%s' not found in '%s'" % (expected_error, actual_error))
class UserMetricsActionTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testUserMetricsActionInActions(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
file_with_user_action = 'file_with_user_action.cc'
contents_with_user_action = ['base::UserMetricsAction("AboutChrome")']
input_api.files = [
MockFile(file_with_user_action, contents_with_user_action)
]
self.assertEqual([],
PRESUBMIT.CheckUserActionUpdate(
input_api, MockOutputApi()))
def testUserMetricsActionNotAddedToActions(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
file_with_user_action = 'file_with_user_action.cc'
contents_with_user_action = [
'base::UserMetricsAction("NotInActionsXml")'
]
input_api.files = [
MockFile(file_with_user_action, contents_with_user_action)
]
output = PRESUBMIT.CheckUserActionUpdate(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(
('File %s line %d: %s is missing in '
'tools/metrics/actions/actions.xml. Please run '
'tools/metrics/actions/extract_actions.py to update.' %
(file_with_user_action, 1, 'NotInActionsXml')), output[0].message)
def testUserMetricsActionInTestFile(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
file_with_user_action = 'file_with_user_action_unittest.cc'
contents_with_user_action = [
'base::UserMetricsAction("NotInActionsXml")'
]
input_api.files = [
MockFile(file_with_user_action, contents_with_user_action)
]
self.assertEqual([],
PRESUBMIT.CheckUserActionUpdate(
input_api, MockOutputApi()))
class PydepsNeedsUpdatingTest(unittest.TestCase):
class MockPopen:
def __init__(self, stdout):
self.stdout = io.StringIO(stdout)
def wait(self):
return 0
class MockSubprocess:
CalledProcessError = subprocess.CalledProcessError
PIPE = 0
def __init__(self):
self._popen_func = None
def SetPopenCallback(self, func):
self._popen_func = func
def Popen(self, cmd, *args, **kwargs):
return PydepsNeedsUpdatingTest.MockPopen(self._popen_func(cmd))
def _MockParseGclientArgs(self, is_android=True):
return lambda: {'checkout_android': 'true' if is_android else 'false'}
def setUp(self):
mock_all_pydeps = ['A.pydeps', 'B.pydeps', 'D.pydeps']
self.old_ALL_PYDEPS_FILES = PRESUBMIT._ALL_PYDEPS_FILES
PRESUBMIT._ALL_PYDEPS_FILES = mock_all_pydeps
mock_android_pydeps = ['D.pydeps']
self.old_ANDROID_SPECIFIC_PYDEPS_FILES = (
PRESUBMIT._ANDROID_SPECIFIC_PYDEPS_FILES)
PRESUBMIT._ANDROID_SPECIFIC_PYDEPS_FILES = mock_android_pydeps
self.old_ParseGclientArgs = PRESUBMIT._ParseGclientArgs
PRESUBMIT._ParseGclientArgs = self._MockParseGclientArgs()
self.mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
self.mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
self.mock_input_api.subprocess = PydepsNeedsUpdatingTest.MockSubprocess(
)
self.checker = PRESUBMIT.PydepsChecker(self.mock_input_api,
mock_all_pydeps)
self.checker._file_cache = {
'A.pydeps':
'# Generated by:\n# CMD --output A.pydeps A\nA.py\nC.py\n',
'B.pydeps':
'# Generated by:\n# CMD --output B.pydeps B\nB.py\nC.py\n',
'D.pydeps': '# Generated by:\n# CMD --output D.pydeps D\nD.py\n',
}
def tearDown(self):
PRESUBMIT._ALL_PYDEPS_FILES = self.old_ALL_PYDEPS_FILES
PRESUBMIT._ANDROID_SPECIFIC_PYDEPS_FILES = (
self.old_ANDROID_SPECIFIC_PYDEPS_FILES)
PRESUBMIT._ParseGclientArgs = self.old_ParseGclientArgs
def _RunCheck(self):
return PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating(
self.mock_input_api,
self.mock_output_api,
checker_for_tests=self.checker)
def testAddedPydep(self):
# PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating is only implemented for Linux.
if not self.mock_input_api.platform.startswith('linux'):
return []
self.mock_input_api.InitFiles([
MockAffectedFile('new.pydeps', [], action='A'),
])
results = self._RunCheck()
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertIn('PYDEPS_FILES', str(results[0]))
def testPydepNotInSrc(self):
self.mock_input_api.InitFiles([
MockAffectedFile('new.pydeps', [], action='A'),
])
self.mock_input_api.os_path.exists = lambda x: False
results = self._RunCheck()
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
def testRemovedPydep(self):
# PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating is only implemented for Linux.
if not self.mock_input_api.platform.startswith('linux'):
return []
self.mock_input_api.InitFiles([
MockAffectedFile(PRESUBMIT._ALL_PYDEPS_FILES[0], [], action='D'),
])
results = self._RunCheck()
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertIn('PYDEPS_FILES', str(results[0]))
def testRandomPyIgnored(self):
# PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating is only implemented for Linux.
if not self.mock_input_api.platform.startswith('linux'):
return []
self.mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('random.py', []),
]
results = self._RunCheck()
self.assertEqual(0, len(results), 'Unexpected results: %r' % results)
def testRelevantPyNoChange(self):
# PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating is only implemented for Linux.
if not self.mock_input_api.platform.startswith('linux'):
return []
self.mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('A.py', []),
]
def popen_callback(cmd):
self.assertEqual('CMD --output A.pydeps A --output ""', cmd)
return self.checker._file_cache['A.pydeps']
self.mock_input_api.subprocess.SetPopenCallback(popen_callback)
results = self._RunCheck()
self.assertEqual(0, len(results), 'Unexpected results: %r' % results)
def testRelevantPyOneChange(self):
# PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating is only implemented for Linux.
if not self.mock_input_api.platform.startswith('linux'):
return []
self.mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('A.py', []),
]
def popen_callback(cmd):
self.assertEqual('CMD --output A.pydeps A --output ""', cmd)
return 'changed data'
self.mock_input_api.subprocess.SetPopenCallback(popen_callback)
results = self._RunCheck()
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
# Check that --output "" is not included.
self.assertNotIn('""', str(results[0]))
self.assertIn('File is stale', str(results[0]))
def testRelevantPyTwoChanges(self):
# PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating is only implemented for Linux.
if not self.mock_input_api.platform.startswith('linux'):
return []
self.mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('C.py', []),
]
def popen_callback(cmd):
return 'changed data'
self.mock_input_api.subprocess.SetPopenCallback(popen_callback)
results = self._RunCheck()
self.assertEqual(2, len(results))
self.assertIn('File is stale', str(results[0]))
self.assertIn('File is stale', str(results[1]))
def testRelevantAndroidPyInNonAndroidCheckout(self):
# PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating is only implemented for Linux.
if not self.mock_input_api.platform.startswith('linux'):
return []
self.mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('D.py', []),
]
def popen_callback(cmd):
self.assertEqual('CMD --output D.pydeps D --output ""', cmd)
return 'changed data'
self.mock_input_api.subprocess.SetPopenCallback(popen_callback)
PRESUBMIT._ParseGclientArgs = self._MockParseGclientArgs(
is_android=False)
results = self._RunCheck()
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertIn('Android', str(results[0]))
self.assertIn('D.pydeps', str(results[0]))
def testGnPathsAndMissingOutputFlag(self):
# PRESUBMIT.CheckPydepsNeedsUpdating is only implemented for Linux.
if not self.mock_input_api.platform.startswith('linux'):
return []
self.checker._file_cache = {
'A.pydeps':
'# Generated by:\n# CMD --gn-paths A\n//A.py\n//C.py\n',
'B.pydeps':
'# Generated by:\n# CMD --gn-paths B\n//B.py\n//C.py\n',
'D.pydeps': '# Generated by:\n# CMD --gn-paths D\n//D.py\n',
}
self.mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('A.py', []),
]
def popen_callback(cmd):
self.assertEqual('CMD --gn-paths A --output A.pydeps --output ""',
cmd)
return 'changed data'
self.mock_input_api.subprocess.SetPopenCallback(popen_callback)
results = self._RunCheck()
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertIn('File is stale', str(results[0]))
class IncludeGuardTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testIncludeGuardChecks(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('content/browser/thing/foo.h', [
'// Comment',
'#ifndef CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_FOO_H_',
'#define CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_FOO_H_',
'struct McBoatFace;',
'#endif // CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_FOO_H_',
]),
MockAffectedFile('content/browser/thing/bar.h', [
'#ifndef CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_BAR_H_',
'#define CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_BAR_H_',
'namespace content {',
'#endif // CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_BAR_H_',
'} // namespace content',
]),
MockAffectedFile('content/browser/test1.h', [
'namespace content {',
'} // namespace content',
]),
MockAffectedFile('content\\browser\\win.h', [
'#ifndef CONTENT_BROWSER_WIN_H_',
'#define CONTENT_BROWSER_WIN_H_',
'struct McBoatFace;',
'#endif // CONTENT_BROWSER_WIN_H_',
]),
MockAffectedFile('content/browser/test2.h', [
'// Comment',
'#ifndef CONTENT_BROWSER_TEST2_H_',
'struct McBoatFace;',
'#endif // CONTENT_BROWSER_TEST2_H_',
]),
MockAffectedFile('content/browser/internal.h', [
'// Comment',
'#ifndef CONTENT_BROWSER_INTERNAL_H_',
'#define CONTENT_BROWSER_INTERNAL_H_',
'// Comment',
'#ifndef INTERNAL_CONTENT_BROWSER_INTERNAL_H_',
'#define INTERNAL_CONTENT_BROWSER_INTERNAL_H_',
'namespace internal {',
'} // namespace internal',
'#endif // INTERNAL_CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_BAR_H_',
'namespace content {',
'} // namespace content',
'#endif // CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_BAR_H_',
]),
MockAffectedFile('content/browser/thing/foo.cc', [
'// This is a non-header.',
]),
MockAffectedFile('content/browser/disabled.h', [
'// no-include-guard-because-multiply-included',
'struct McBoatFace;',
]),
# New files don't allow misspelled include guards.
MockAffectedFile('content/browser/spleling.h', [
'#ifndef CONTENT_BROWSER_SPLLEING_H_',
'#define CONTENT_BROWSER_SPLLEING_H_',
'struct McBoatFace;',
'#endif // CONTENT_BROWSER_SPLLEING_H_',
]),
# New files don't allow + in include guards.
MockAffectedFile('content/browser/foo+bar.h', [
'#ifndef CONTENT_BROWSER_FOO+BAR_H_',
'#define CONTENT_BROWSER_FOO+BAR_H_',
'struct McBoatFace;',
'#endif // CONTENT_BROWSER_FOO+BAR_H_',
]),
# Old files allow misspelled include guards (for now).
MockAffectedFile('chrome/old.h', [
'// New contents',
'#ifndef CHROME_ODL_H_',
'#define CHROME_ODL_H_',
'#endif // CHROME_ODL_H_',
], [
'// Old contents',
'#ifndef CHROME_ODL_H_',
'#define CHROME_ODL_H_',
'#endif // CHROME_ODL_H_',
],
action='M'),
# Using a Blink style include guard outside Blink is wrong.
MockAffectedFile('content/NotInBlink.h', [
'#ifndef NotInBlink_h',
'#define NotInBlink_h',
'struct McBoatFace;',
'#endif // NotInBlink_h',
]),
# Using a Blink style include guard in Blink is no longer ok.
MockAffectedFile('third_party/blink/InBlink.h', [
'#ifndef InBlink_h',
'#define InBlink_h',
'struct McBoatFace;',
'#endif // InBlink_h',
]),
# Using a bad include guard in Blink is not ok.
MockAffectedFile('third_party/blink/AlsoInBlink.h', [
'#ifndef WrongInBlink_h',
'#define WrongInBlink_h',
'struct McBoatFace;',
'#endif // WrongInBlink_h',
]),
# Using a bad include guard in Blink is not supposed to be accepted even
# if it's an old file. However the current presubmit has accepted this
# for a while.
MockAffectedFile('third_party/blink/StillInBlink.h', [
'// New contents',
'#ifndef AcceptedInBlink_h',
'#define AcceptedInBlink_h',
'struct McBoatFace;',
'#endif // AcceptedInBlink_h',
], [
'// Old contents',
'#ifndef AcceptedInBlink_h',
'#define AcceptedInBlink_h',
'struct McBoatFace;',
'#endif // AcceptedInBlink_h',
],
action='M'),
# Using a non-Chromium include guard in third_party
# (outside blink) is accepted.
MockAffectedFile('third_party/foo/some_file.h', [
'#ifndef REQUIRED_RPCNDR_H_',
'#define REQUIRED_RPCNDR_H_',
'struct SomeFileFoo;',
'#endif // REQUIRED_RPCNDR_H_',
]),
# Not having proper include guard in *_message_generator.h
# for old IPC messages is allowed.
MockAffectedFile('content/common/content_message_generator.h', [
'#undef CONTENT_COMMON_FOO_MESSAGES_H_',
'#include "content/common/foo_messages.h"',
'#ifndef CONTENT_COMMON_FOO_MESSAGES_H_',
'#error "Failed to include content/common/foo_messages.h"',
'#endif',
]),
MockAffectedFile('chrome/renderer/thing/qux.h', [
'// Comment',
'#ifndef CHROME_RENDERER_THING_QUX_H_',
'#define CHROME_RENDERER_THING_QUX_H_',
'struct Boaty;',
'#endif',
]),
]
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckForIncludeGuards(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
expected_fail_count = 10
self.assertEqual(
expected_fail_count, len(msgs), 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' %
(expected_fail_count, len(msgs), msgs))
self.assertEqual(msgs[0].items, ['content/browser/thing/bar.h'])
self.assertEqual(
msgs[0].message, 'Include guard CONTENT_BROWSER_THING_BAR_H_ '
'not covering the whole file')
self.assertIn('content/browser/test1.h', msgs[1].message)
self.assertIn('Recommended name: CONTENT_BROWSER_TEST1_H_',
msgs[1].message)
self.assertEqual(msgs[2].items, ['content/browser/test2.h:3'])
self.assertEqual(
msgs[2].message, 'Missing "#define CONTENT_BROWSER_TEST2_H_" for '
'include guard')
self.assertIn('content/browser/internal.h', msgs[3].message)
self.assertIn(
'Recommended #endif comment: // CONTENT_BROWSER_INTERNAL_H_',
msgs[3].message)
self.assertEqual(msgs[4].items, ['content/browser/spleling.h:1'])
self.assertEqual(
msgs[4].message, 'Header using the wrong include guard name '
'CONTENT_BROWSER_SPLLEING_H_')
self.assertIn('content/browser/foo+bar.h', msgs[5].message)
self.assertIn('Recommended name: CONTENT_BROWSER_FOO_BAR_H_',
msgs[5].message)
self.assertEqual(msgs[6].items, ['content/NotInBlink.h:1'])
self.assertEqual(
msgs[6].message, 'Header using the wrong include guard name '
'NotInBlink_h')
self.assertEqual(msgs[7].items, ['third_party/blink/InBlink.h:1'])
self.assertEqual(
msgs[7].message, 'Header using the wrong include guard name '
'InBlink_h')
self.assertEqual(msgs[8].items, ['third_party/blink/AlsoInBlink.h:1'])
self.assertEqual(
msgs[8].message, 'Header using the wrong include guard name '
'WrongInBlink_h')
self.assertIn('chrome/renderer/thing/qux.h', msgs[9].message)
self.assertIn(
'Recommended #endif comment: // CHROME_RENDERER_THING_QUX_H_',
msgs[9].message)
class AccessibilityRelnotesFieldTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testRelnotesPresent(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('ui/accessibility/foo.bar', [''])
]
mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: 'Commit description'
mock_input_api.change.footers['AX-Relnotes'] = [
'Important user facing change'
]
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityRelnotesField(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(
0, len(msgs),
'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs))
def testRelnotesMissingFromAccessibilityChange(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('some/file', ['']),
MockAffectedFile('ui/accessibility/foo.bar', ['']),
MockAffectedFile('some/other/file', [''])
]
mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: 'Commit description'
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityRelnotesField(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(
1, len(msgs),
'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (1, len(msgs), msgs))
self.assertTrue(
"Missing 'AX-Relnotes:' field" in msgs[0].message,
'Missing AX-Relnotes field message not found in errors')
# The relnotes footer is not required for changes which do not touch any
# accessibility directories.
def testIgnoresNonAccessibilityCode(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('some/file', ['']),
MockAffectedFile('some/other/file', [''])
]
mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: 'Commit description'
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityRelnotesField(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(
0, len(msgs),
'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs))
# Test that our presubmit correctly raises an error for a set of known paths.
def testExpectedPaths(self):
filesToTest = [
"chrome/browser/accessibility/foo.py",
"chrome/browser/ash/arc/accessibility/foo.cc",
"chrome/browser/ui/views/accessibility/foo.h",
"chrome/browser/extensions/api/automation/foo.h",
"chrome/browser/extensions/api/automation_internal/foo.cc",
"chrome/renderer/extensions/accessibility_foo.h",
"chrome/tests/data/accessibility/foo.html",
"content/browser/accessibility/foo.cc",
"content/renderer/accessibility/foo.h",
"content/tests/data/accessibility/foo.cc",
"extensions/renderer/api/automation/foo.h",
"ui/accessibility/foo/bar/baz.cc",
"ui/views/accessibility/foo/bar/baz.h",
]
for testFile in filesToTest:
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [MockAffectedFile(testFile, [''])]
mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: 'Commit description'
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityRelnotesField(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(
1, len(msgs),
'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s, for file %s' %
(1, len(msgs), msgs, testFile))
self.assertTrue(
"Missing 'AX-Relnotes:' field" in msgs[0].message,
('Missing AX-Relnotes field message not found in errors '
' for file %s' % (testFile)))
# Test that AX-Relnotes field can appear in the commit description (as long
# as it appears at the beginning of a line).
def testRelnotesInCommitDescription(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('ui/accessibility/foo.bar', ['']),
]
mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: (
'Description:\n' +
'AX-Relnotes: solves all accessibility issues forever')
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityRelnotesField(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(
0, len(msgs),
'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs))
# Test that we don't match AX-Relnotes if it appears in the middle of a line.
def testRelnotesMustAppearAtBeginningOfLine(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('ui/accessibility/foo.bar', ['']),
]
mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: (
'Description:\n' +
'This change has no AX-Relnotes: we should print a warning')
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityRelnotesField(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertTrue(
"Missing 'AX-Relnotes:' field" in msgs[0].message,
'Missing AX-Relnotes field message not found in errors')
# Tests that the AX-Relnotes field can be lowercase and use a '=' in place
# of a ':'.
def testRelnotesLowercaseWithEqualSign(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('ui/accessibility/foo.bar', ['']),
]
mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: (
'Description:\n' +
'ax-relnotes= this is a valid format for accessibility relnotes')
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityRelnotesField(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(
0, len(msgs),
'Expected %d messages, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs))
class AccessibilityAriaElementAttributeGettersTest(unittest.TestCase):
# Test warning is surfaced for various possible uses of bad methods.
def testMatchingLines(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile(
"third_party/blink/renderer/core/accessibility/ax_object.h", [
"->getAttribute(html_names::kAriaCheckedAttr)",
"node->hasAttribute(html_names::kRoleAttr)",
"->FastHasAttribute(html_names::kAriaLabelAttr)",
" .FastGetAttribute(html_names::kAriaCurrentAttr);",
],
action='M'),
MockFile(
"third_party/blink/renderer/core/accessibility/ax_table.cc", [
"bool result = node->hasAttribute(html_names::kFooAttr);",
"foo->getAttribute(html_names::kAriaInvalidValueAttr)",
"foo->GetAriaCurrentState(html_names::kAriaCurrentStateAttr)",
],
action='M'),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityAriaElementAttributeGetters(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual(5, len(results[0].items))
self.assertIn("ax_object.h:1", results[0].items[0])
self.assertIn("ax_object.h:2", results[0].items[1])
self.assertIn("ax_object.h:3", results[0].items[2])
self.assertIn("ax_object.h:4", results[0].items[3])
self.assertIn("ax_table.cc:2", results[0].items[4])
self.assertIn("Please use ARIA-specific attribute access",
results[0].message)
# Test no warnings for files that are not accessibility related.
def testNonMatchingFiles(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile("content/browser/foobar/foo.cc",
["->getAttribute(html_names::kAriaCheckedAttr)"],
action='M'),
MockFile("third_party/blink/renderer/core/foo.cc",
["node->hasAttribute(html_names::kRoleAttr)"],
action='M'),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityAriaElementAttributeGetters(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
# Test no warning when methods are used with different attribute params.
def testNoBadParam(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile(
"third_party/blink/renderer/core/accessibility/ax_object.h", [
"->getAttribute(html_names::kCheckedAttr)",
"->hasAttribute(html_names::kIdAttr)",
],
action='M')
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityAriaElementAttributeGetters(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
# Test no warning when attribute params are used for different methods.
def testNoMethod(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile(
"third_party/blink/renderer/core/accessibility/ax_object.cc", [
"foo(html_names::kAriaCheckedAttr)",
"bar(html_names::kRoleAttr)"
],
action='M')
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckAccessibilityAriaElementAttributeGetters(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
class AndroidDeprecatedTestAnnotationTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testCheckAndroidTestAnnotationUsage(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('LalaLand.java', ['random stuff']),
MockAffectedFile('CorrectUsage.java', [
'import androidx.test.filters.LargeTest;',
'import androidx.test.filters.MediumTest;',
'import androidx.test.filters.SmallTest;',
]),
MockAffectedFile('UsedDeprecatedLargeTestAnnotation.java', [
'import android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.LargeTest;',
]),
MockAffectedFile('UsedDeprecatedMediumTestAnnotation.java', [
'import android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.MediumTest;',
]),
MockAffectedFile('UsedDeprecatedSmallTestAnnotation.java', [
'import android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.SmallTest;',
]),
MockAffectedFile('UsedDeprecatedSmokeAnnotation.java', [
'import android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.Smoke;',
])
]
msgs = PRESUBMIT._CheckAndroidTestAnnotationUsage(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(
1, len(msgs),
'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (1, len(msgs), msgs))
self.assertEqual(
4, len(msgs[0].items), 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' %
(4, len(msgs[0].items), msgs[0].items))
self.assertTrue(
'UsedDeprecatedLargeTestAnnotation.java:1' in msgs[0].items,
'UsedDeprecatedLargeTestAnnotation not found in errors')
self.assertTrue(
'UsedDeprecatedMediumTestAnnotation.java:1' in msgs[0].items,
'UsedDeprecatedMediumTestAnnotation not found in errors')
self.assertTrue(
'UsedDeprecatedSmallTestAnnotation.java:1' in msgs[0].items,
'UsedDeprecatedSmallTestAnnotation not found in errors')
self.assertTrue(
'UsedDeprecatedSmokeAnnotation.java:1' in msgs[0].items,
'UsedDeprecatedSmokeAnnotation not found in errors')
class AndroidBannedImportTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testCheckAndroidNoBannedImports(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
test_files = [
MockAffectedFile('RandomStufff.java', ['random stuff']),
MockAffectedFile('NoBannedImports.java', [
'import androidx.test.filters.LargeTest;',
'import androidx.test.filters.MediumTest;',
'import androidx.test.filters.SmallTest;',
]),
MockAffectedFile('BannedUri.java', [
'import java.net.URI;',
]),
MockAffectedFile('BannedTargetApi.java', [
'import android.annotation.TargetApi;',
]),
MockAffectedFile('BannedActivityTestRule.java', [
'import androidx.test.rule.ActivityTestRule;',
]),
MockAffectedFile('BannedVectorDrawableCompat.java', [
'import androidx.vectordrawable.graphics.drawable.VectorDrawableCompat;',
])
]
msgs = []
for file in test_files:
mock_input_api.files = [file]
msgs.append(
PRESUBMIT.CheckNoBannedPatterns(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api))
self.assertEqual(0, len(msgs[0]))
self.assertEqual(0, len(msgs[1]))
self.assertTrue(msgs[2][0].message.startswith(
textwrap.dedent("""\
A banned pattern was used.
BannedUri.java:1:""")))
self.assertTrue(msgs[3][0].message.startswith(
textwrap.dedent("""\
A banned pattern was used.
BannedTargetApi.java:1:""")))
self.assertTrue(msgs[4][0].message.startswith(
textwrap.dedent("""\
A banned pattern was used.
BannedActivityTestRule.java:1:""")))
self.assertTrue(msgs[5][0].message.startswith(
textwrap.dedent("""\
A banned pattern was used.
BannedVectorDrawableCompat.java:1:""")))
class CheckNoDownstreamDepsTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testInvalidDepFromUpstream(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('BUILD.gn',
['deps = [', ' "//clank/target:test",', ']']),
MockAffectedFile('chrome/android/BUILD.gn',
['deps = [ "//clank/target:test" ]']),
MockAffectedFile(
'chrome/chrome_java_deps.gni',
['java_deps = [', ' "//clank/target:test",', ']']),
]
mock_input_api.change.RepositoryRoot = lambda: 'chromium/src'
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoUpstreamDepsOnClank(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(
1, len(msgs),
'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (1, len(msgs), msgs))
self.assertEqual(
3, len(msgs[0].items), 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' %
(3, len(msgs[0].items), msgs[0].items))
self.assertTrue(any('BUILD.gn:2' in item for item in msgs[0].items),
'BUILD.gn not found in errors')
self.assertTrue(
any('chrome/android/BUILD.gn:1' in item for item in msgs[0].items),
'chrome/android/BUILD.gn:1 not found in errors')
self.assertTrue(
any('chrome/chrome_java_deps.gni:2' in item
for item in msgs[0].items),
'chrome/chrome_java_deps.gni:2 not found in errors')
def testAllowsComments(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('BUILD.gn', [
'# real implementation in //clank/target:test',
]),
]
mock_input_api.change.RepositoryRoot = lambda: 'chromium/src'
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoUpstreamDepsOnClank(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(
0, len(msgs),
'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs))
def testOnlyChecksBuildFiles(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('README.md',
['DEPS = [ "//clank/target:test" ]']),
MockAffectedFile('chrome/android/java/file.java',
['//clank/ only function']),
]
mock_input_api.change.RepositoryRoot = lambda: 'chromium/src'
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoUpstreamDepsOnClank(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(
0, len(msgs),
'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs))
def testValidDepFromDownstream(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('BUILD.gn',
['DEPS = [', ' "//clank/target:test",', ']']),
MockAffectedFile('java/BUILD.gn',
['DEPS = [ "//clank/target:test" ]']),
]
mock_input_api.change.RepositoryRoot = lambda: 'chromium/src/clank'
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoUpstreamDepsOnClank(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(
0, len(msgs),
'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (0, len(msgs), msgs))
class AndroidDebuggableBuildTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testCheckAndroidDebuggableBuild(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('RandomStuff.java', ['random stuff']),
MockAffectedFile('CorrectUsage.java', [
'import org.chromium.base.BuildInfo;',
'some random stuff',
'boolean isOsDebuggable = BuildInfo.isDebugAndroid();',
]),
MockAffectedFile('JustCheckUserdebugBuild.java', [
'import android.os.Build;',
'some random stuff',
'boolean isOsDebuggable = Build.TYPE.equals("userdebug")',
]),
MockAffectedFile('JustCheckEngineeringBuild.java', [
'import android.os.Build;',
'some random stuff',
'boolean isOsDebuggable = "eng".equals(Build.TYPE)',
]),
MockAffectedFile('UsedBuildType.java', [
'import android.os.Build;',
'some random stuff',
'boolean isOsDebuggable = Build.TYPE.equals("userdebug")'
'|| "eng".equals(Build.TYPE)',
]),
MockAffectedFile('UsedExplicitBuildType.java', [
'some random stuff',
'boolean isOsDebuggable = android.os.Build.TYPE.equals("userdebug")'
'|| "eng".equals(android.os.Build.TYPE)',
]),
]
msgs = PRESUBMIT._CheckAndroidDebuggableBuild(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(
1, len(msgs),
'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (1, len(msgs), msgs))
self.assertEqual(
4, len(msgs[0].items), 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' %
(4, len(msgs[0].items), msgs[0].items))
self.assertTrue('JustCheckUserdebugBuild.java:3' in msgs[0].items)
self.assertTrue('JustCheckEngineeringBuild.java:3' in msgs[0].items)
self.assertTrue('UsedBuildType.java:3' in msgs[0].items)
self.assertTrue('UsedExplicitBuildType.java:2' in msgs[0].items)
class LogUsageTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testCheckAndroidCrLogUsage(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('RandomStuff.java', ['random stuff']),
MockAffectedFile('HasAndroidLog.java', [
'import android.util.Log;',
'some random stuff',
'Log.d("TAG", "foo");',
]),
MockAffectedFile('HasExplicitUtilLog.java', [
'some random stuff',
'android.util.Log.d("TAG", "foo");',
]),
MockAffectedFile('IsInBasePackage.java', [
'package org.chromium.base;',
'private static final String TAG = "cr_Foo";',
'Log.d(TAG, "foo");',
]),
MockAffectedFile('IsInBasePackageButImportsLog.java', [
'package org.chromium.base;',
'import android.util.Log;',
'private static final String TAG = "cr_Foo";',
'Log.d(TAG, "foo");',
]),
MockAffectedFile('HasBothLog.java', [
'import org.chromium.base.Log;',
'some random stuff',
'private static final String TAG = "cr_Foo";',
'Log.d(TAG, "foo");',
'android.util.Log.d("TAG", "foo");',
]),
MockAffectedFile('HasCorrectTag.java', [
'import org.chromium.base.Log;',
'some random stuff',
'private static final String TAG = "cr_Foo";',
'Log.d(TAG, "foo");',
]),
MockAffectedFile('HasOldTag.java', [
'import org.chromium.base.Log;',
'some random stuff',
'private static final String TAG = "cr.Foo";',
'Log.d(TAG, "foo");',
]),
MockAffectedFile('HasDottedTag.java', [
'import org.chromium.base.Log;',
'some random stuff',
'private static final String TAG = "cr_foo.bar";',
'Log.d(TAG, "foo");',
]),
MockAffectedFile('HasDottedTagPublic.java', [
'import org.chromium.base.Log;',
'some random stuff',
'public static final String TAG = "cr_foo.bar";',
'Log.d(TAG, "foo");',
]),
MockAffectedFile('HasNoTagDecl.java', [
'import org.chromium.base.Log;',
'some random stuff',
'Log.d(TAG, "foo");',
]),
MockAffectedFile('HasIncorrectTagDecl.java', [
'import org.chromium.base.Log;',
'private static final String TAHG = "cr_Foo";',
'some random stuff',
'Log.d(TAG, "foo");',
]),
MockAffectedFile('HasInlineTag.java', [
'import org.chromium.base.Log;',
'some random stuff',
'private static final String TAG = "cr_Foo";',
'Log.d("TAG", "foo");',
]),
MockAffectedFile('HasInlineTagWithSpace.java', [
'import org.chromium.base.Log;',
'some random stuff',
'private static final String TAG = "cr_Foo";',
'Log.d("log message", "foo");',
]),
MockAffectedFile('HasUnprefixedTag.java', [
'import org.chromium.base.Log;',
'some random stuff',
'private static final String TAG = "rubbish";',
'Log.d(TAG, "foo");',
]),
MockAffectedFile('HasTooLongTag.java', [
'import org.chromium.base.Log;',
'some random stuff',
'private static final String TAG = "21_characters_long___";',
'Log.d(TAG, "foo");',
]),
MockAffectedFile('HasTooLongTagWithNoLogCallsInDiff.java', [
'import org.chromium.base.Log;',
'some random stuff',
'private static final String TAG = "21_characters_long___";',
]),
]
msgs = PRESUBMIT._CheckAndroidCrLogUsage(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(
5, len(msgs),
'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (5, len(msgs), msgs))
# Declaration format
nb = len(msgs[0].items)
self.assertEqual(
2, nb, 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (2, nb, msgs[0].items))
self.assertTrue('HasNoTagDecl.java' in msgs[0].items)
self.assertTrue('HasIncorrectTagDecl.java' in msgs[0].items)
# Tag length
nb = len(msgs[1].items)
self.assertEqual(
2, nb, 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (2, nb, msgs[1].items))
self.assertTrue('HasTooLongTag.java' in msgs[1].items)
self.assertTrue(
'HasTooLongTagWithNoLogCallsInDiff.java' in msgs[1].items)
# Tag must be a variable named TAG
nb = len(msgs[2].items)
self.assertEqual(
3, nb, 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (3, nb, msgs[2].items))
self.assertTrue('HasBothLog.java:5' in msgs[2].items)
self.assertTrue('HasInlineTag.java:4' in msgs[2].items)
self.assertTrue('HasInlineTagWithSpace.java:4' in msgs[2].items)
# Util Log usage
nb = len(msgs[3].items)
self.assertEqual(
5, nb, 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (3, nb, msgs[3].items))
self.assertTrue('HasAndroidLog.java:1' in msgs[3].items)
self.assertTrue('HasAndroidLog.java:3' in msgs[3].items)
self.assertTrue('HasExplicitUtilLog.java:2' in msgs[3].items)
self.assertTrue('IsInBasePackageButImportsLog.java:2' in msgs[3].items)
self.assertTrue('IsInBasePackageButImportsLog.java:4' in msgs[3].items)
# Tag must not contain
nb = len(msgs[4].items)
self.assertEqual(
3, nb, 'Expected %d items, found %d: %s' % (2, nb, msgs[4].items))
self.assertTrue('HasDottedTag.java' in msgs[4].items)
self.assertTrue('HasDottedTagPublic.java' in msgs[4].items)
self.assertTrue('HasOldTag.java' in msgs[4].items)
class GoogleAnswerUrlFormatTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testCatchAnswerUrlId(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('somewhere/file.cc', [
'char* host = '
' "https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/123456";'
]),
MockFile('somewhere_else/file.cc', [
'char* host = '
' "https://support.google.com/chrome/a/answer/123456";'
]),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckGoogleSupportAnswerUrlOnUpload(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertEqual(2, len(warnings[0].items))
def testAllowAnswerUrlParam(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('somewhere/file.cc', [
'char* host = '
' "https://support.google.com/chrome/?p=cpn_crash_reports";'
]),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckGoogleSupportAnswerUrlOnUpload(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
class HardcodedGoogleHostsTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testWarnOnAssignedLiterals(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('content/file.cc',
['char* host = "https://www.google.com";']),
MockFile('content/file.cc',
['char* host = "https://www.googleapis.com";']),
MockFile('content/file.cc',
['char* host = "https://clients1.google.com";']),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckHardcodedGoogleHostsInLowerLayers(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertEqual(3, len(warnings[0].items))
def testAllowInComment(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('content/file.cc',
['char* host = "https://www.aol.com"; // google.com'])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckHardcodedGoogleHostsInLowerLayers(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
class ChromeOsSyncedPrefRegistrationTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testWarnsOnChromeOsDirectories(self):
files = [
MockFile('ash/file.cc', ['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']),
MockFile('chrome/browser/chromeos/file.cc',
['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']),
MockFile('chromeos/file.cc',
['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']),
MockFile('components/arc/file.cc',
['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']),
MockFile('components/exo/file.cc',
['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']),
]
input_api = MockInputApi()
for file in files:
input_api.files = [file]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckChromeOsSyncedPrefRegistration(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
def testDoesNotWarnOnSyncOsPref(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('chromeos/file.cc',
['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_OS_PREF']),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckChromeOsSyncedPrefRegistration(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testDoesNotWarnOnOtherDirectories(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('chrome/browser/ui/file.cc',
['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']),
MockFile('components/sync/file.cc',
['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']),
MockFile('content/browser/file.cc',
['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']),
MockFile('a/notchromeos/file.cc',
['PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF']),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckChromeOsSyncedPrefRegistration(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testSeparateWarningForPriorityPrefs(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('chromeos/file.cc', [
'PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PREF',
'PrefRegistrySyncable::SYNCABLE_PRIORITY_PREF'
]),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckChromeOsSyncedPrefRegistration(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(2, len(warnings))
class ForwardDeclarationTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testCheckHeadersOnlyOutsideThirdParty(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('somewhere/file.cc', ['class DummyClass;']),
MockAffectedFile('third_party/header.h', ['class DummyClass;'])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckUselessForwardDeclarations(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testNoNestedDeclaration(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('somewhere/header.h', [
'class SomeClass {', ' protected:', ' class NotAMatch;', '};'
])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckUselessForwardDeclarations(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testSubStrings(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('somewhere/header.h', [
'class NotUsefulClass;', 'struct SomeStruct;',
'UsefulClass *p1;', 'SomeStructPtr *p2;'
])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckUselessForwardDeclarations(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(2, len(warnings))
def testUselessForwardDeclaration(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('somewhere/header.h', [
'class DummyClass;', 'struct DummyStruct;',
'class UsefulClass;', 'std::unique_ptr<UsefulClass> p;'
])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckUselessForwardDeclarations(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(2, len(warnings))
def testBlinkHeaders(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('third_party/blink/header.h', [
'class DummyClass;',
'struct DummyStruct;',
]),
MockAffectedFile('third_party\\blink\\header.h', [
'class DummyClass;',
'struct DummyStruct;',
])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckUselessForwardDeclarations(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(4, len(warnings))
class RelativeIncludesTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testThirdPartyNotWebKitIgnored(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('third_party/test.cpp', '#include "../header.h"'),
MockAffectedFile('third_party/test/test.cpp',
'#include "../header.h"'),
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForRelativeIncludes(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
def testNonCppFileIgnored(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('test.py', '#include "../header.h"'),
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForRelativeIncludes(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
def testInnocuousChangesAllowed(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('test.cpp', '#include "header.h"'),
MockAffectedFile('test2.cpp', '../'),
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForRelativeIncludes(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
def testRelativeIncludeNonWebKitProducesError(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('test.cpp', ['#include "../header.h"']),
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForRelativeIncludes(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
def testRelativeIncludeWebKitProducesError(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('third_party/blink/test.cpp',
['#include "../header.h']),
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForRelativeIncludes(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
class CCIncludeTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testThirdPartyNotBlinkIgnored(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('third_party/test.cpp', '#include "file.cc"'),
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForCcIncludes(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
def testPythonFileIgnored(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('test.py', '#include "file.cc"'),
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForCcIncludes(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
def testIncFilesAccepted(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('test.py', '#include "file.inc"'),
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForCcIncludes(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
def testInnocuousChangesAllowed(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('test.cpp', '#include "header.h"'),
MockAffectedFile('test2.cpp', 'Something "file.cc"'),
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForCcIncludes(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
def testCcIncludeNonBlinkProducesError(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('test.cpp', ['#include "file.cc"']),
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForCcIncludes(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
def testCppIncludeBlinkProducesError(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('third_party/blink/test.cpp',
['#include "foo/file.cpp"']),
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForCcIncludes(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
class GnGlobForwardTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testAddBareGlobs(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.gni',
['forward_variables_from(invoker, "*")']),
MockAffectedFile('base/BUILD.gn',
['forward_variables_from(invoker, "*")']),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckGnGlobForward(mock_input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
msg = '\n'.join(warnings[0].items)
self.assertIn('base/stuff.gni', msg)
# Should not check .gn files. Local templates don't need to care about
# visibility / testonly.
self.assertNotIn('base/BUILD.gn', msg)
def testValidUses(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.gni',
['forward_variables_from(invoker, "*", [])']),
MockAffectedFile('base/stuff2.gni', [
'forward_variables_from(invoker, "*", TESTONLY_AND_VISIBILITY)'
]),
MockAffectedFile(
'base/stuff3.gni',
['forward_variables_from(invoker, [ "testonly" ])']),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckGnGlobForward(mock_input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual([], warnings)
class GnRebasePathTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testAddAbsolutePath(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('base/BUILD.gn',
['rebase_path("$target_gen_dir", "//")']),
MockAffectedFile('base/root/BUILD.gn',
['rebase_path("$target_gen_dir", "/")']),
MockAffectedFile('base/variable/BUILD.gn',
['rebase_path(target_gen_dir, "/")']),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckGnRebasePath(mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
msg = '\n'.join(warnings[0].items)
self.assertIn('base/BUILD.gn', msg)
self.assertIn('base/root/BUILD.gn', msg)
self.assertIn('base/variable/BUILD.gn', msg)
self.assertEqual(3, len(warnings[0].items))
def testValidUses(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
'base/foo/BUILD.gn',
['rebase_path("$target_gen_dir", root_build_dir)']),
MockAffectedFile(
'base/bar/BUILD.gn',
['rebase_path("$target_gen_dir", root_build_dir, "/")']),
MockAffectedFile('base/baz/BUILD.gn',
['rebase_path(target_gen_dir, root_build_dir)']),
MockAffectedFile(
'base/baz/BUILD.gn',
['rebase_path(target_gen_dir, "//some/arbitrary/path")']),
MockAffectedFile('base/okay_slash/BUILD.gn',
['rebase_path(".", "//")']),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckGnRebasePath(mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual([], warnings)
class NewHeaderWithoutGnChangeTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testAddHeaderWithoutGn(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', ''),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertTrue('base/stuff.h' in warnings[0].items)
def testModifyHeader(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', '', action='M'),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testDeleteHeader(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', '', action='D'),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testAddHeaderWithGn(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', ''),
MockAffectedFile('base/BUILD.gn', 'stuff.h'),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testAddHeaderWithGni(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', ''),
MockAffectedFile('base/files.gni', 'stuff.h'),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testAddHeaderWithOther(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', ''),
MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.cc', 'stuff.h'),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
def testAddHeaderWithWrongGn(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', ''),
MockAffectedFile('base/BUILD.gn', 'stuff_h'),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
def testAddHeadersWithGn(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', ''),
MockAffectedFile('base/another.h', ''),
MockAffectedFile('base/BUILD.gn', 'another.h\nstuff.h'),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testAddHeadersWithWrongGn(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', ''),
MockAffectedFile('base/another.h', ''),
MockAffectedFile('base/BUILD.gn', 'another_h\nstuff.h'),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertFalse('base/stuff.h' in warnings[0].items)
self.assertTrue('base/another.h' in warnings[0].items)
def testAddHeadersWithWrongGn2(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('base/stuff.h', ''),
MockAffectedFile('base/another.h', ''),
MockAffectedFile('base/BUILD.gn', 'another_h\nstuff_h'),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckNewHeaderWithoutGnChangeOnUpload(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertTrue('base/stuff.h' in warnings[0].items)
self.assertTrue('base/another.h' in warnings[0].items)
class CorrectProductNameInMessagesTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testProductNameInDesc(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/google_chrome_strings.grd', [
'<message name="Foo" desc="Welcome to Chrome">',
' Welcome to Chrome!',
'</message>',
]),
MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd', [
'<message name="Bar" desc="Welcome to Chrome">',
' Welcome to Chromium!',
'</message>',
]),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckCorrectProductNameInMessages(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testChromeInChromium(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/google_chrome_strings.grd', [
'<message name="Foo" desc="Welcome to Chrome">',
' Welcome to Chrome!',
'</message>',
]),
MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd', [
'<message name="Bar" desc="Welcome to Chrome">',
' Welcome to Chrome!',
'</message>',
]),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckCorrectProductNameInMessages(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertTrue(
'chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd' in warnings[0].items[0])
def testChromiumInChrome(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/google_chrome_strings.grd', [
'<message name="Foo" desc="Welcome to Chrome">',
' Welcome to Chromium!',
'</message>',
]),
MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd', [
'<message name="Bar" desc="Welcome to Chrome">',
' Welcome to Chromium!',
'</message>',
]),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckCorrectProductNameInMessages(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertTrue(
'chrome/app/google_chrome_strings.grd:2' in warnings[0].items[0])
def testChromeForTestingInChromium(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd', [
'<message name="Bar" desc="Welcome to Chrome">',
' Welcome to Chrome for Testing!',
'</message>',
]),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckCorrectProductNameInMessages(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testChromeForTestingInChrome(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/google_chrome_strings.grd', [
'<message name="Bar" desc="Welcome to Chrome">',
' Welcome to Chrome for Testing!',
'</message>',
]),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckCorrectProductNameInMessages(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertTrue(
'chrome/app/google_chrome_strings.grd:2' in warnings[0].items[0])
def testMultipleInstances(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd', [
'<message name="Bar" desc="Welcome to Chrome">',
' Welcome to Chrome!',
'</message>',
'<message name="Baz" desc="A correct message">',
' Chromium is the software you are using.',
'</message>',
'<message name="Bat" desc="An incorrect message">',
' Google Chrome is the software you are using.',
'</message>',
]),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckCorrectProductNameInMessages(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertTrue(
'chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd:2' in warnings[0].items[0])
self.assertTrue(
'chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd:8' in warnings[0].items[1])
def testMultipleWarnings(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd', [
'<message name="Bar" desc="Welcome to Chrome">',
' Welcome to Chrome!',
'</message>',
'<message name="Baz" desc="A correct message">',
' Chromium is the software you are using.',
'</message>',
'<message name="Bat" desc="An incorrect message">',
' Google Chrome is the software you are using.',
'</message>',
]),
MockAffectedFile(
'components/components_google_chrome_strings.grd', [
'<message name="Bar" desc="Welcome to Chrome">',
' Welcome to Chrome!',
'</message>',
'<message name="Baz" desc="A correct message">',
' Chromium is the software you are using.',
'</message>',
'<message name="Bat" desc="An incorrect message">',
' Google Chrome is the software you are using.',
'</message>',
]),
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckCorrectProductNameInMessages(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(2, len(warnings))
self.assertTrue('components/components_google_chrome_strings.grd:5' in
warnings[0].items[0])
self.assertTrue(
'chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd:2' in warnings[1].items[0])
self.assertTrue(
'chrome/app/chromium_strings.grd:8' in warnings[1].items[1])
class _SecurityOwnersTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
def _createMockInputApi(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
def FakeRepositoryRoot():
return mock_input_api.os_path.join('chromium', 'src')
mock_input_api.change.RepositoryRoot = FakeRepositoryRoot
self._injectFakeOwnersClient(
mock_input_api, ['apple@chromium.org', 'orange@chromium.org'])
return mock_input_api
def _setupFakeChange(self, input_api):
class FakeGerrit(object):
def IsOwnersOverrideApproved(self, issue):
return False
input_api.change.issue = 123
input_api.gerrit = FakeGerrit()
def _injectFakeOwnersClient(self, input_api, owners):
class FakeOwnersClient(object):
def ListOwners(self, f):
return owners
input_api.owners_client = FakeOwnersClient()
def _injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(self, input_api, owner, reviewers):
def MockOwnerAndReviewers(input_api,
email_regexp,
approval_needed=False):
return [owner, reviewers]
input_api.canned_checks.GetCodereviewOwnerAndReviewers = \
MockOwnerAndReviewers
class IpcSecurityOwnerTest(_SecurityOwnersTestCase):
_test_cases = [
('*_messages.cc', 'scary_messages.cc'),
('*_messages*.h', 'scary_messages.h'),
('*_messages*.h', 'scary_messages_android.h'),
('*_param_traits*.*', 'scary_param_traits.h'),
('*_param_traits*.*', 'scary_param_traits_win.h'),
('*.mojom', 'scary.mojom'),
('*_mojom_traits*.*', 'scary_mojom_traits.h'),
('*_mojom_traits*.*', 'scary_mojom_traits_mac.h'),
('*_type_converter*.*', 'scary_type_converter.h'),
('*.aidl', 'scary.aidl'),
]
def testHasCorrectPerFileRulesAndSecurityReviewer(self):
mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi()
new_owners_file_path = mock_input_api.os_path.join(
'services', 'goat', 'public', 'OWNERS')
new_owners_file = [
'per-file *.mojom=set noparent',
'per-file *.mojom=file://ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS'
]
def FakeReadFile(filename):
self.assertEqual(
mock_input_api.os_path.join('chromium', 'src',
new_owners_file_path), filename)
return '\n'.join(new_owners_file)
mock_input_api.ReadFile = FakeReadFile
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(new_owners_file_path, new_owners_file),
MockAffectedFile(
mock_input_api.os_path.join('services', 'goat', 'public',
'goat.mojom'),
['// Scary contents.'])
]
self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api)
self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api,
'owner@chromium.org',
['orange@chromium.org'])
mock_input_api.is_committing = True
mock_input_api.dry_run = False
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
def testMissingSecurityReviewerAtUpload(self):
mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi()
new_owners_file_path = mock_input_api.os_path.join(
'services', 'goat', 'public', 'OWNERS')
new_owners_file = [
'per-file *.mojom=set noparent',
'per-file *.mojom=file://ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS'
]
def FakeReadFile(filename):
self.assertEqual(
mock_input_api.os_path.join('chromium', 'src',
new_owners_file_path), filename)
return '\n'.join(new_owners_file)
mock_input_api.ReadFile = FakeReadFile
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(new_owners_file_path, new_owners_file),
MockAffectedFile(
mock_input_api.os_path.join('services', 'goat', 'public',
'goat.mojom'),
['// Scary contents.'])
]
self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api)
self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api,
'owner@chromium.org',
['banana@chromium.org'])
mock_input_api.is_committing = False
mock_input_api.dry_run = False
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual('notify', results[0].type)
self.assertEqual(
'Review from an owner in ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS is required for the '
'following newly-added files:', results[0].message)
def testMissingSecurityReviewerAtDryRunCommit(self):
mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi()
new_owners_file_path = mock_input_api.os_path.join(
'services', 'goat', 'public', 'OWNERS')
new_owners_file = [
'per-file *.mojom=set noparent',
'per-file *.mojom=file://ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS'
]
def FakeReadFile(filename):
self.assertEqual(
mock_input_api.os_path.join('chromium', 'src',
new_owners_file_path), filename)
return '\n'.join(new_owners_file)
mock_input_api.ReadFile = FakeReadFile
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(new_owners_file_path, new_owners_file),
MockAffectedFile(
mock_input_api.os_path.join('services', 'goat', 'public',
'goat.mojom'),
['// Scary contents.'])
]
self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api)
self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api,
'owner@chromium.org',
['banana@chromium.org'])
mock_input_api.is_committing = True
mock_input_api.dry_run = True
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual('error', results[0].type)
self.assertEqual(
'Review from an owner in ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS is required for the '
'following newly-added files:', results[0].message)
def testMissingSecurityApprovalAtRealCommit(self):
mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi()
new_owners_file_path = mock_input_api.os_path.join(
'services', 'goat', 'public', 'OWNERS')
new_owners_file = [
'per-file *.mojom=set noparent',
'per-file *.mojom=file://ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS'
]
def FakeReadFile(filename):
self.assertEqual(
mock_input_api.os_path.join('chromium', 'src',
new_owners_file_path), filename)
return '\n'.join(new_owners_file)
mock_input_api.ReadFile = FakeReadFile
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(new_owners_file_path, new_owners_file),
MockAffectedFile(
mock_input_api.os_path.join('services', 'goat', 'public',
'goat.mojom'),
['// Scary contents.'])
]
self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api)
self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api,
'owner@chromium.org',
['banana@chromium.org'])
mock_input_api.is_committing = True
mock_input_api.dry_run = False
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual('error', results[0].type)
self.assertEqual(
'Review from an owner in ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS is required for the '
'following newly-added files:', results[0].message)
def testIpcChangeNeedsSecurityOwner(self):
for is_committing in [True, False]:
for pattern, filename in self._test_cases:
with self.subTest(
line=
f'is_committing={is_committing}, filename={filename}'):
mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
mock_input_api.os_path.join(
'services', 'goat', 'public', filename),
['// Scary contents.'])
]
self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api)
self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(
mock_input_api, 'owner@chromium.org',
['banana@chromium.org'])
mock_input_api.is_committing = is_committing
mock_input_api.dry_run = False
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual('error', results[0].type)
self.assertTrue(results[0].message.replace(
'\\', '/'
).startswith(
'Found missing OWNERS lines for security-sensitive files. '
'Please add the following lines to services/goat/public/OWNERS:'
))
self.assertEqual(['ipc-security-reviews@chromium.org'],
mock_output_api.more_cc)
def testServiceManifestChangeNeedsSecurityOwner(self):
mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
mock_input_api.os_path.join('services', 'goat', 'public',
'cpp', 'manifest.cc'),
[
'#include "services/goat/public/cpp/manifest.h"',
'const service_manager::Manifest& GetManifest() {}',
])
]
self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api)
self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api,
'owner@chromium.org',
['banana@chromium.org'])
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
self.assertTrue(errors[0].message.replace('\\', '/').startswith(
'Found missing OWNERS lines for security-sensitive files. '
'Please add the following lines to services/goat/public/cpp/OWNERS:'
))
self.assertEqual(['ipc-security-reviews@chromium.org'],
mock_output_api.more_cc)
def testNonServiceManifestSourceChangesDoNotRequireSecurityOwner(self):
mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi()
self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api,
'owner@chromium.org',
['banana@chromium.org'])
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('some/non/service/thing/foo_manifest.cc', [
'const char kNoEnforcement[] = "not a manifest!";',
])
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual([], errors)
self.assertEqual([], mock_output_api.more_cc)
class FuchsiaSecurityOwnerTest(_SecurityOwnersTestCase):
def testFidlChangeNeedsSecurityOwner(self):
mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('potentially/scary/ipc.fidl',
['library test.fidl'])
]
self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api)
self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api,
'owner@chromium.org',
['banana@chromium.org'])
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
self.assertTrue(errors[0].message.replace('\\', '/').startswith(
'Found missing OWNERS lines for security-sensitive files. '
'Please add the following lines to potentially/scary/OWNERS:'))
def testComponentManifestV1ChangeNeedsSecurityOwner(self):
mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('potentially/scary/v2_manifest.cmx',
['{ "that is no": "manifest!" }'])
]
self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api)
self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api,
'owner@chromium.org',
['banana@chromium.org'])
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
self.assertTrue(errors[0].message.replace('\\', '/').startswith(
'Found missing OWNERS lines for security-sensitive files. '
'Please add the following lines to potentially/scary/OWNERS:'))
def testComponentManifestV2NeedsSecurityOwner(self):
mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('potentially/scary/v2_manifest.cml',
['{ "that is no": "manifest!" }'])
]
self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api)
self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api,
'owner@chromium.org',
['banana@chromium.org'])
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
self.assertTrue(errors[0].message.replace('\\', '/').startswith(
'Found missing OWNERS lines for security-sensitive files. '
'Please add the following lines to potentially/scary/OWNERS:'))
def testThirdPartyTestsDoNotRequireSecurityOwner(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api,
'owner@chromium.org',
['banana@chromium.org'])
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('third_party/crashpad/test/tests.cmx', [
'const char kNoEnforcement[] = "Security?!? Pah!";',
])
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual([], errors)
def testOtherFuchsiaChangesDoNotRequireSecurityOwner(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api,
'owner@chromium.org',
['banana@chromium.org'])
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
'some/non/service/thing/fuchsia_fidl_cml_cmx_magic.cc', [
'const char kNoEnforcement[] = "Security?!? Pah!";',
])
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityOwners(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual([], errors)
class SecurityChangeTest(_SecurityOwnersTestCase):
def testDiffGetServiceSandboxType(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('services/goat/teleporter_host.cc', [
'template <>', 'inline content::SandboxType',
'content::GetServiceSandboxType<chrome::mojom::GoatTeleporter>() {',
'#if defined(OS_WIN)', ' return SandboxType::kGoaty;',
'#else', ' return SandboxType::kNoSandbox;',
'#endif // !defined(OS_WIN)', '}'
]),
]
files_to_functions = PRESUBMIT._GetFilesUsingSecurityCriticalFunctions(
mock_input_api)
self.assertEqual(
{
'services/goat/teleporter_host.cc':
set(['content::GetServiceSandboxType<>()'])
}, files_to_functions)
def testDiffRemovingLine(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_file = MockAffectedFile('services/goat/teleporter_host.cc', '')
mock_file._scm_diff = """--- old 2020-05-04 14:08:25.000000000 -0400
+++ new 2020-05-04 14:08:32.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
template <>
inline content::SandboxType
-content::GetServiceSandboxType<chrome::mojom::GoatTeleporter>() {
#if defined(OS_WIN)
return SandboxType::kGoaty;
"""
mock_input_api.files = [mock_file]
files_to_functions = PRESUBMIT._GetFilesUsingSecurityCriticalFunctions(
mock_input_api)
self.assertEqual(
{
'services/goat/teleporter_host.cc':
set(['content::GetServiceSandboxType<>()'])
}, files_to_functions)
def testChangeOwnersMissing(self):
mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi()
self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api)
self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api,
'owner@chromium.org',
['banana@chromium.org'])
mock_input_api.is_committing = False
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('file.cc',
['GetServiceSandboxType<Goat>(Sandbox)'])
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
result = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityChanges(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(result))
self.assertEqual(result[0].type, 'notify')
self.assertEqual(result[0].message,
'The following files change calls to security-sensitive functions\n' \
'that need to be reviewed by ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS.\n'
' file.cc\n'
' content::GetServiceSandboxType<>()\n\n')
def testChangeOwnersMissingAtCommit(self):
mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi()
self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api)
self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api,
'owner@chromium.org',
['banana@chromium.org'])
mock_input_api.is_committing = True
mock_input_api.dry_run = False
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('file.cc',
['GetServiceSandboxType<mojom::Goat>()'])
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
result = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityChanges(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(result))
self.assertEqual(result[0].type, 'error')
self.assertEqual(result[0].message,
'The following files change calls to security-sensitive functions\n' \
'that need to be reviewed by ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS.\n'
' file.cc\n'
' content::GetServiceSandboxType<>()\n\n')
def testChangeOwnersPresent(self):
mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi()
self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(
mock_input_api, 'owner@chromium.org',
['apple@chromium.org', 'banana@chromium.org'])
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('file.cc', ['WithSandboxType(Sandbox)'])
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
result = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityChanges(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(0, len(result))
def testChangeOwnerIsSecurityOwner(self):
mock_input_api = self._createMockInputApi()
self._setupFakeChange(mock_input_api)
self._injectFakeChangeOwnerAndReviewers(mock_input_api,
'orange@chromium.org',
['pear@chromium.org'])
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('file.cc', ['GetServiceSandboxType<T>(Sandbox)'])
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
result = PRESUBMIT.CheckSecurityChanges(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(result))
class BannedTypeCheckTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testBannedJsFunctions(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('ash/webui/file.js', ['chrome.send(something);']),
MockFile('some/js/ok/file.js', ['chrome.send(something);']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoBannedPatterns(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertTrue('ash/webui/file.js' in results[0].message)
self.assertFalse('some/js/ok/file.js' in results[0].message)
def testBannedJavaFunctions(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('some/java/problematic/diskread.java',
['StrictMode.allowThreadDiskReads();']),
MockFile('some/java/problematic/diskwrite.java',
['StrictMode.allowThreadDiskWrites();']),
MockFile('some/java/ok/diskwrite.java',
['StrictModeContext.allowDiskWrites();']),
MockFile('some/java/problematic/waitidleforsync.java',
['instrumentation.waitForIdleSync();']),
MockFile('some/java/problematic/registerreceiver.java',
['context.registerReceiver();']),
MockFile('some/java/problematic/property.java',
['new Property<abc, Integer>;']),
MockFile('some/java/problematic/requestlayout.java',
['requestLayout();']),
MockFile('some/java/problematic/lastprofile.java',
['ProfileManager.getLastUsedRegularProfile();']),
MockFile('some/java/problematic/getdrawable1.java',
['ResourcesCompat.getDrawable();']),
MockFile('some/java/problematic/getdrawable2.java',
['getResources().getDrawable();']),
MockFile('some/java/problematic/announceForAccessibility.java',
['view.announceForAccessibility(accessibilityText);']),
MockFile(
'some/java/problematic/accessibilityTypeAnnouncement.java', [
'accessibilityEvent.setEventType(AccessibilityEvent.TYPE_ANNOUNCEMENT);'
]),
MockFile('content/java/problematic/desktopandroid.java',
['if (DeviceInfo.isDesktop()) {}']),
MockFile('content/java/problematic/desktopandroid1.java',
['if (PackageManager.FEATURE_PC) {}']),
MockFile('content/java/problematic/desktopandroid2.java',
['if (BuildConfig.IS_DESKTOP_ANDROID) {}']),
]
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoBannedPatterns(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(14, len(errors))
self.assertTrue(
'some/java/problematic/diskread.java' in errors[0].message)
self.assertTrue(
'some/java/problematic/diskwrite.java' in errors[1].message)
self.assertTrue(
all('some/java/ok/diskwrite.java' not in e.message
for e in errors))
self.assertTrue(
'some/java/problematic/waitidleforsync.java' in errors[2].message)
self.assertTrue(
'some/java/problematic/registerreceiver.java' in errors[3].message)
self.assertTrue(
'some/java/problematic/property.java' in errors[4].message)
self.assertTrue(
'some/java/problematic/requestlayout.java' in errors[5].message)
self.assertTrue(
'some/java/problematic/lastprofile.java' in errors[6].message)
self.assertTrue(
'some/java/problematic/getdrawable1.java' in errors[7].message)
self.assertTrue(
'some/java/problematic/getdrawable2.java' in errors[8].message)
self.assertTrue('some/java/problematic/announceForAccessibility.java'
in errors[9].message)
self.assertTrue(
'some/java/problematic/accessibilityTypeAnnouncement.java' in
errors[10].message)
self.assertTrue('content/java/problematic/desktopandroid.java' in
errors[11].message)
self.assertTrue('content/java/problematic/desktopandroid1.java' in
errors[12].message)
self.assertTrue('content/java/problematic/desktopandroid2.java' in
errors[13].message)
def testBannedCppFunctions(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('some/cpp/problematic/file.cc', ['using namespace std;']),
MockFile('third_party/blink/problematic/file.cc',
['GetInterfaceProvider()']),
MockFile('some/cpp/ok/file.cc', ['using std::string;']),
MockFile('some/cpp/nocheck/file.cc',
['using namespace std; // nocheck']),
MockFile('some/cpp/comment/file.cc',
[' // A comment about `using namespace std;`']),
MockFile('some/cpp/problematic/file2.cc', [
'params.ownership = Widget::InitParams::WIDGET_OWNS_NATIVE_WIDGET'
]),
MockFile('some/cpp/problematic/file3.cc', [
'params.ownership = Widget::InitParams::NATIVE_WIDGET_OWNS_WIDGET'
]),
MockFile('some/cpp/problematic/file4.cc', [
'Browser* browser = chrome::FindBrowserWithTab(web_contents)'
]),
MockFile(
'allowed_ranges_usage.cc',
[
'std::ranges::begin(vec);',
'std::ranges::subrange(first, last);',
# std::ranges::view is a concept and allowed, but the views
# library itself is not (see below)
'static_assert(std::ranges::view<SomeType>);'
]),
MockFile(
'banned_ranges_usage.cc',
[
'std::ranges::borrowed_subrange_t(subrange);',
# Edge case: make sure std::ranges::views is disallowed,
# even though std::ranges::view is allowed.
'std::ranges::views::take(first, count);'
]),
MockFile('views_usage.cc', ['std::views::all(vec)']),
MockFile('content/desktop_android.cc', [
'// some first line',
'#if BUILDFLAG(IS_DESKTOP_ANDROID)',
'// some third line',
]),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoBannedPatterns(input_api, MockOutputApi())
# Each entry in results corresponds to a BanRule with a violation, in
# the order they were encountered.
self.assertEqual(9, len(results))
self.assertTrue('some/cpp/problematic/file.cc' in results[0].message)
self.assertTrue(
'third_party/blink/problematic/file.cc' in results[1].message)
self.assertTrue(
all('some/cpp/ok/file.cc' not in r.message for r in results))
self.assertTrue('some/cpp/problematic/file2.cc' in results[2].message)
self.assertTrue('some/cpp/problematic/file3.cc' in results[3].message)
self.assertTrue('some/cpp/problematic/file4.cc' in results[4].message)
self.assertTrue(
all('some/cpp/nocheck/file.cc' not in r.message for r in results))
self.assertTrue(
all('some/cpp/comment/file.cc' not in r.message for r in results))
self.assertTrue(
all('allowed_ranges_usage.cc' not in r.message for r in results))
self.assertTrue('banned_ranges_usage.cc' in results[5].message)
self.assertTrue('banned_ranges_usage.cc' in results[6].message)
self.assertTrue('views_usage.cc' in results[7].message)
self.assertTrue('content/desktop_android.cc' in results[8].message)
# Check ResultLocation data. Line nums start at 1.
self.assertEqual(results[8].locations[0].file_path,
'content/desktop_android.cc')
self.assertEqual(results[8].locations[0].start_line, 2)
self.assertEqual(results[8].locations[0].end_line, 2)
def testBannedCppRandomFunctions(self):
banned_rngs = [
'absl::BitGen',
'absl::InsecureBitGen',
'std::linear_congruential_engine',
'std::mersenne_twister_engine',
'std::subtract_with_carry_engine',
'std::discard_block_engine',
'std::independent_bits_engine',
'std::shuffle_order_engine',
'std::minstd_rand0',
'std::minstd_rand',
'std::mt19937',
'std::mt19937_64',
'std::ranlux24_base',
'std::ranlux48_base',
'std::ranlux24',
'std::ranlux48',
'std::knuth_b',
'std::default_random_engine',
'std::random_device',
]
for banned_rng in banned_rngs:
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('some/cpp/problematic/file.cc',
[f'{banned_rng} engine;']),
MockFile('third_party/blink/problematic/file.cc',
[f'{banned_rng} engine;']),
MockFile('third_party/ok/file.cc', [f'{banned_rng} engine;']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoBannedPatterns(input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(2, len(results), banned_rng)
self.assertTrue(
'some/cpp/problematic/file.cc' in results[0].message,
banned_rng)
self.assertTrue(
'third_party/blink/problematic/file.cc' in results[1].message,
banned_rng)
self.assertTrue(
all('third_party/ok/file.cc' not in r.message
for r in results))
def testBannedIosObjcFunctions(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('some/ios/file.mm',
['TEST(SomeClassTest, SomeInteraction) {', '}']),
MockFile('some/mac/file.mm',
['TEST(SomeClassTest, SomeInteraction) {', '}']),
MockFile('another/ios_file.mm',
['class SomeTest : public testing::Test {};']),
MockFile(
'some/ios/file_egtest.mm',
['- (void)testSomething { EXPECT_OCMOCK_VERIFY(aMock); }']),
MockFile('some/ios/file_unittest.mm', [
'TEST_F(SomeTest, TestThis) { EXPECT_OCMOCK_VERIFY(aMock); }'
]),
]
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoBannedPatterns(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(3, len(errors))
self.assertTrue('some/ios/file.mm' in errors[0].message)
self.assertTrue('another/ios_file.mm' in errors[1].message)
self.assertTrue(
all('some/mac/file.mm' not in e.message for e in errors))
self.assertTrue('some/ios/file_egtest.mm' in errors[2].message)
self.assertTrue(
all('some/ios/file_unittest.mm' not in e.message for e in errors))
def testBannedMojoFunctions(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('some/cpp/problematic/file2.cc', ['mojo::ConvertTo<>']),
MockFile('third_party/blink/ok/file3.cc', ['mojo::ConvertTo<>']),
MockFile('content/renderer/ok/file3.cc', ['mojo::ConvertTo<>']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoBannedPatterns(input_api, MockOutputApi())
# Each entry in results corresponds to a BanRule with a violation, in
# the order they were encountered.
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertTrue('some/cpp/problematic/file2.cc' in results[0].message)
self.assertTrue(
'third_party/blink/ok/file3.cc' not in results[0].message)
self.assertTrue(
'content/renderer/ok/file3.cc' not in results[0].message)
def testBannedMojomPatterns_SharedBuffer(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile(
'bad.mojom',
['struct Bad {', ' handle<shared_buffer> buffer;', '};']),
MockFile('good.mojom', [
'struct Good {',
' mojo_base.mojom.ReadOnlySharedMemoryRegion region1;',
' mojo_base.mojom.WritableSharedMemoryRegion region2;',
' mojo_base.mojom.UnsafeSharedMemoryRegion region3;', '};'
]),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoBannedPatterns(input_api, MockOutputApi())
# Each entry in results corresponds to a BanRule with a violation, in
# the order they were encountered.
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertTrue('bad.mojom' in results[0].message)
self.assertTrue('good.mojom' not in results[0].message)
def testBannedMojomPatterns_ExtensionId(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
# Pattern tests.
MockFile('extensions/bad.mojom', ['string extension_id']),
MockFile('extensions/bad_struct.mojom',
['struct Bad {', ' string extension_id;', '};']),
MockFile('extensions/good.mojom', ['ExtensionId extension_id']),
MockFile('extensions/good_struct.mojom',
['struct Bad {', ' ExtensionId extension_id;', '};']),
# Path exclusion tests.
MockFile('some/included/extensions/path/bad_extension_id.mojom',
['string extension_id']),
MockFile('some/excluded/path/bad_extension_id.mojom',
['string extension_id']),
]
# Each entry in results corresponds to a BanRule with a violation, in
# the order they were encountered.
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoBannedPatterns(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(3, len(results))
# Pattern test assertions.
self.assertTrue('bad.mojom' in results[0].message)
self.assertTrue('bad_struct.mojom' in results[1].message)
self.assertTrue(all('good.mojom' not in r.message for r in results))
self.assertTrue(
all('good_struct.mojom' not in r.message for r in results))
# Path exclusion assertions.
self.assertTrue('some/included/extensions/path/bad_extension_id.mojom'
in results[2].message)
self.assertTrue(
all('some/excluded/path/bad_extension_id.mojom' not in r.message
for r in results))
class NoProductionCodeUsingTestOnlyFunctionsTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testTruePositives(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('some/path/foo.cc', ['foo_for_testing();']),
MockFile('some/path/foo.mm', ['FooForTesting();']),
MockFile('some/path/foo.cxx', ['FooForTests();']),
MockFile('some/path/foo.cpp', ['foo_for_test();']),
MockFile('some/path/foo.cc', ['::FooForTesting();']),
MockFile('some/path/foo.cc', ['FooForTesting());']),
MockFile('some/path/foo.cc', ['::FooForTesting());']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoProductionCodeUsingTestOnlyFunctions(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual(7, len(results[0].items))
self.assertTrue('foo.cc' in results[0].items[0])
self.assertTrue('foo.mm' in results[0].items[1])
self.assertTrue('foo.cxx' in results[0].items[2])
self.assertTrue('foo.cpp' in results[0].items[3])
def testFalsePositives(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('some/path/foo.h', ['foo_for_testing();']),
MockFile('some/path/foo.mm', ['FooForTesting() {']),
MockFile('some/path/foo.cc', ['::FooForTesting() {']),
MockFile('some/path/foo.cpp', ['// foo_for_test();']),
MockFile('some/path/foo.cxx', ['foo_for_test(); // IN-TEST']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoProductionCodeUsingTestOnlyFunctions(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
def testAllowedFiles(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('path/foo_unittest.cc', ['foo_for_testing();']),
MockFile('path/bar_unittest_mac.cc', ['foo_for_testing();']),
MockFile('path/baz_unittests.cc', ['foo_for_testing();']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoProductionCodeUsingTestOnlyFunctions(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
class NoProductionJavaCodeUsingTestOnlyFunctionsTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testTruePositives(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('dir/java/src/foo.java', ['FooForTesting();']),
MockFile('dir/java/src/bar.java', ['FooForTests(x);']),
MockFile('dir/java/src/baz.java', ['FooForTest(', 'y', ');']),
MockFile('dir/java/src/mult.java', [
'int x = SomethingLongHere()',
' * SomethingLongHereForTesting();'
])
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoProductionCodeUsingTestOnlyFunctionsJava(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual(4, len(results[0].items))
self.assertTrue('foo.java' in results[0].items[0])
self.assertTrue('bar.java' in results[0].items[1])
self.assertTrue('baz.java' in results[0].items[2])
self.assertTrue('mult.java' in results[0].items[3])
def testFalsePositives(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('dir/java/src/foo.xml', ['FooForTesting();']),
MockFile('dir/java/src/foo.java', ['FooForTests() {']),
MockFile('dir/java/src/bar.java', ['// FooForTest();']),
MockFile('dir/java/src/bar2.java', ['x = 1; // FooForTest();']),
MockFile('dir/java/src/bar3.java', ['@VisibleForTesting']),
MockFile('dir/java/src/bar4.java', ['@VisibleForTesting()']),
MockFile('dir/java/src/bar5.java', [
'@VisibleForTesting(otherwise = VisibleForTesting.PROTECTED)'
]),
MockFile('dir/javatests/src/baz.java', ['FooForTest(', 'y', ');']),
MockFile('dir/junit/src/baz.java', ['FooForTest(', 'y', ');']),
MockFile('dir/junit/src/javadoc.java',
['/** Use FooForTest(); to obtain foo in tests.'
' */']),
MockFile(
'dir/junit/src/javadoc2.java',
['/** ', ' * Use FooForTest(); to obtain foo in tests.'
' */']),
MockFile('dir/java/src/bar6.java',
['FooForTesting(); // IN-TEST']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoProductionCodeUsingTestOnlyFunctionsJava(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
class NewImagesWarningTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testTruePositives(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('dir/android/res/drawable/foo.png', []),
MockFile('dir/android/res/drawable-v21/bar.svg', []),
MockFile('dir/android/res/mipmap-v21-en/baz.webp', []),
MockFile('dir/android/res_gshoe/drawable-mdpi/foobar.png', []),
]
results = PRESUBMIT._CheckNewImagesWarning(mock_input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual(4, len(results[0].items))
self.assertTrue('foo.png' in results[0].items[0].LocalPath())
self.assertTrue('bar.svg' in results[0].items[1].LocalPath())
self.assertTrue('baz.webp' in results[0].items[2].LocalPath())
self.assertTrue('foobar.png' in results[0].items[3].LocalPath())
def testFalsePositives(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('dir/pngs/README.md', []),
MockFile('java/test/res/drawable/foo.png', []),
MockFile('third_party/blink/foo.png', []),
MockFile('dir/third_party/libpng/src/foo.cc', ['foobar']),
MockFile('dir/resources.webp/.gitignore', ['foo.png']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT._CheckNewImagesWarning(mock_input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
class ProductIconsTest(unittest.TestCase):
def test(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('components/vector_icons/google_jetpack.icon', []),
MockFile('components/vector_icons/generic_jetpack.icon', []),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoProductIconsAddedToPublicRepo(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual(1, len(results[0].items))
self.assertTrue('google_jetpack.icon' in results[0].items[0])
class CheckUniquePtrTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testTruePositivesNullptr(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('dir/baz.cc', ['std::unique_ptr<T>()']),
MockFile('dir/baz-p.cc', ['std::unique_ptr<T<P>>()']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckUniquePtrOnUpload(mock_input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertTrue('nullptr' in results[0].message)
self.assertEqual(2, len(results[0].items))
self.assertTrue('baz.cc' in results[0].items[0])
self.assertTrue('baz-p.cc' in results[0].items[1])
def testTruePositivesConstructor(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('dir/foo.cc', ['return std::unique_ptr<T>(foo);']),
MockFile('dir/bar.mm', ['bar = std::unique_ptr<T>(foo)']),
MockFile('dir/mult.cc', [
'return',
' std::unique_ptr<T>(barVeryVeryLongFooSoThatItWouldNotFitAbove);'
]),
MockFile('dir/mult2.cc', [
'barVeryVeryLongLongBaaaaaarSoThatTheLineLimitIsAlmostReached =',
' std::unique_ptr<T>(foo);'
]),
MockFile('dir/mult3.cc', [
'bar = std::unique_ptr<T>(',
' fooVeryVeryVeryLongStillGoingWellThisWillTakeAWhileFinallyThere);'
]),
MockFile('dir/multi_arg.cc', [
'auto p = std::unique_ptr<std::pair<T, D>>(new std::pair(T, D));'
]),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckUniquePtrOnUpload(mock_input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertTrue('std::make_unique' in results[0].message)
self.assertEqual(6, len(results[0].items))
self.assertTrue('foo.cc' in results[0].items[0])
self.assertTrue('bar.mm' in results[0].items[1])
self.assertTrue('mult.cc' in results[0].items[2])
self.assertTrue('mult2.cc' in results[0].items[3])
self.assertTrue('mult3.cc' in results[0].items[4])
self.assertTrue('multi_arg.cc' in results[0].items[5])
def testFalsePositives(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('dir/foo.cc', ['return std::unique_ptr<T[]>(foo);']),
MockFile('dir/bar.mm', ['bar = std::unique_ptr<T[]>(foo)']),
MockFile('dir/file.cc', ['std::unique_ptr<T> p = Foo();']),
MockFile('dir/baz.cc',
['std::unique_ptr<T> result = std::make_unique<T>();']),
MockFile('dir/baz2.cc',
['std::unique_ptr<T> result = std::make_unique<T>(']),
MockFile('dir/nested.cc', ['set<std::unique_ptr<T>>();']),
MockFile('dir/nested2.cc', ['map<U, std::unique_ptr<T>>();']),
# Changed line is inside a multiline template block.
MockFile('dir/template.cc', [' std::unique_ptr<T>>(']),
MockFile('dir/template2.cc', [' std::unique_ptr<T>>()']),
# Two-argument invocation of std::unique_ptr is exempt because there is
# no equivalent using std::make_unique.
MockFile('dir/multi_arg.cc',
['auto p = std::unique_ptr<T, D>(new T(), D());']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckUniquePtrOnUpload(mock_input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual([], results)
class CheckNoDirectIncludesHeadersWhichRedefineStrCat(unittest.TestCase):
def testBlocksDirectIncludes(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('dir/foo_win.cc', ['#include "shlwapi.h"']),
MockFile('dir/bar.h', ['#include <propvarutil.h>']),
MockFile('dir/baz.h', ['#include <atlbase.h>']),
MockFile('dir/jumbo.h', ['#include "sphelper.h"']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoStrCatRedefines(mock_input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual(4, len(results[0].items))
self.assertTrue('StrCat' in results[0].message)
self.assertTrue('foo_win.cc' in results[0].items[0])
self.assertTrue('bar.h' in results[0].items[1])
self.assertTrue('baz.h' in results[0].items[2])
self.assertTrue('jumbo.h' in results[0].items[3])
def testAllowsToIncludeWrapper(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('dir/baz_win.cc', ['#include "base/win/shlwapi.h"']),
MockFile('dir/baz-win.h', ['#include "base/win/atl.h"']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoStrCatRedefines(mock_input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
def testAllowsToCreateWrapper(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('base/win/shlwapi.h', [
'#include <shlwapi.h>',
'#include "base/win/windows_defines.inc"'
]),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoStrCatRedefines(mock_input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
def testIgnoresNonImplAndHeaders(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('dir/foo_win.txt', ['#include "shlwapi.h"']),
MockFile('dir/bar.asm', ['#include <propvarutil.h>']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoStrCatRedefines(mock_input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
class StringTest(unittest.TestCase):
"""Tests ICU syntax check and translation screenshots check."""
# An empty grd file.
OLD_GRD_CONTENTS = """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<grit latest_public_release="1" current_release="1">
<release seq="1">
<messages></messages>
</release>
</grit>
""".splitlines()
# A grd file with a single message.
NEW_GRD_CONTENTS1 = """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<grit latest_public_release="1" current_release="1">
<release seq="1">
<messages>
<message name="IDS_TEST1">
Test string 1
</message>
<message name="IDS_TEST_STRING_NON_TRANSLATEABLE1"
translateable="false">
Non translateable message 1, should be ignored
</message>
<message name="IDS_TEST_STRING_ACCESSIBILITY"
is_accessibility_with_no_ui="true">
Accessibility label 1, should be ignored
</message>
</messages>
</release>
</grit>
""".splitlines()
# A grd file with two messages.
NEW_GRD_CONTENTS2 = """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<grit latest_public_release="1" current_release="1">
<release seq="1">
<messages>
<message name="IDS_TEST1">
Test string 1
</message>
<message name="IDS_TEST2">
Test string 2
</message>
<message name="IDS_TEST_STRING_NON_TRANSLATEABLE2"
translateable="false">
Non translateable message 2, should be ignored
</message>
</messages>
</release>
</grit>
""".splitlines()
# A grd file with one ICU syntax message without syntax errors.
NEW_GRD_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK1 = """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<grit latest_public_release="1" current_release="1">
<release seq="1">
<messages>
<message name="IDS_TEST1">
{NUM, plural,
=1 {Test text for numeric one}
other {Test text for plural with {NUM} as number}}
</message>
</messages>
</release>
</grit>
""".splitlines()
# A grd file with one ICU syntax message without syntax errors.
NEW_GRD_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK2 = """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<grit latest_public_release="1" current_release="1">
<release seq="1">
<messages>
<message name="IDS_TEST1">
{NUM, plural,
=1 {Different test text for numeric one}
other {Different test text for plural with {NUM} as number}}
</message>
</messages>
</release>
</grit>
""".splitlines()
# A grd file with multiple ICU syntax messages without syntax errors.
NEW_GRD_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK3 = """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<grit latest_public_release="1" current_release="1">
<release seq="1">
<messages>
<message name="IDS_TEST1">
{NUM, plural,
=0 {New test text for numeric zero}
=1 {Different test text for numeric one}
=2 {New test text for numeric two}
=3 {New test text for numeric three}
other {Different test text for plural with {NUM} as number}}
</message>
</messages>
</release>
</grit>
""".splitlines()
# A grd file with one ICU syntax message with syntax errors (misses a comma).
NEW_GRD_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_ERROR = """<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<grit latest_public_release="1" current_release="1">
<release seq="1">
<messages>
<message name="IDS_TEST1">
{NUM, plural
=1 {Test text for numeric one}
other {Test text for plural with {NUM} as number}}
</message>
</messages>
</release>
</grit>
""".splitlines()
OLD_GRDP_CONTENTS = ('<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>',
'<grit-part>', '</grit-part>')
NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS1 = ('<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>',
'<grit-part>', '<message name="IDS_PART_TEST1">',
'Part string 1', '</message>', '</grit-part>')
NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS2 = ('<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>',
'<grit-part>', '<message name="IDS_PART_TEST1">',
'Part string 1', '</message>',
'<message name="IDS_PART_TEST2">', 'Part string 2',
'</message>', '</grit-part>')
NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS3 = (
'<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>', '<grit-part>',
'<message name="IDS_PART_TEST1" desc="Description with typo.">',
'Part string 1', '</message>', '</grit-part>')
NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS4 = (
'<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>', '<grit-part>',
'<message name="IDS_PART_TEST1" desc="Description with typo fixed.">',
'Part string 1', '</message>', '</grit-part>')
NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS5 = (
'<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>', '<grit-part>',
'<message name="IDS_PART_TEST1" meaning="Meaning with typo.">',
'Part string 1', '</message>', '</grit-part>')
NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS6 = (
'<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>', '<grit-part>',
'<message name="IDS_PART_TEST1" meaning="Meaning with typo fixed.">',
'Part string 1', '</message>', '</grit-part>')
# A grdp file with one ICU syntax message without syntax errors.
NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK1 = (
'<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>', '<grit-part>',
'<message name="IDS_PART_TEST1">', '{NUM, plural,',
'=1 {Test text for numeric one}',
'other {Test text for plural with {NUM} as number}}', '</message>',
'</grit-part>')
# A grdp file with one ICU syntax message without syntax errors.
NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK2 = (
'<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>', '<grit-part>',
'<message name="IDS_PART_TEST1">', '{NUM, plural,',
'=1 {Different test text for numeric one}',
'other {Different test text for plural with {NUM} as number}}',
'</message>', '</grit-part>')
# A grdp file with multiple ICU syntax messages without syntax errors.
NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK3 = (
'<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>', '<grit-part>',
'<message name="IDS_PART_TEST1">', '{NUM, plural,',
'=0 {New test text for numeric zero}',
'=1 {Different test text for numeric one}',
'=2 {New test text for numeric two}',
'=3 {New test text for numeric three}',
'other {Different test text for plural with {NUM} as number}}',
'</message>', '</grit-part>')
# A grdp file with one ICU syntax message with syntax errors (superfluous
# space).
NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_ERROR = (
'<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>', '<grit-part>',
'<message name="IDS_PART_TEST1">', '{NUM, plural,',
'= 1 {Test text for numeric one}',
'other {Test text for plural with {NUM} as number}}', '</message>',
'</grit-part>')
VALID_SHA1 = ('0000000000000000000000000000000000000000', )
DO_NOT_UPLOAD_PNG_MESSAGE = ('Do not include actual screenshots in the '
'changelist. Run '
'tools/translation/upload_screenshots.py to '
'upload them instead:')
ADD_SIGNATURES_MESSAGE = ('You are adding UI strings.\n'
'To ensure the best translations, take '
'screenshots of the relevant UI '
'(https://g.co/chrome/translation) and add '
'these files to your changelist:')
REMOVE_SIGNATURES_MESSAGE = ('You removed strings associated with these '
'files. Remove:')
ICU_SYNTAX_ERROR_MESSAGE = (
'ICU syntax errors were found in the following '
'strings (problems or feedback? Contact '
'rainhard@chromium.org):')
SHA1_FORMAT_MESSAGE = (
'The following files do not seem to contain valid sha1 '
'hashes. Make sure they contain hashes created by '
'tools/translation/upload_screenshots.py:')
def makeInputApi(self, files):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.InitFiles(files)
return input_api
""" CL modified and added messages, but didn't add any screenshots."""
def testNoScreenshots(self):
# No new strings (file contents same). Should not warn.
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
MockAffectedFile('test.grd',
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS1,
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS1,
action='M'),
MockAffectedFile('part.grdp',
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS1,
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS1,
action='M')
])
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
# Add two new strings. Should have two warnings.
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
MockAffectedFile('test.grd',
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS2,
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS1,
action='M'),
MockAffectedFile('part.grdp',
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS2,
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS1,
action='M')
])
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertEqual(self.ADD_SIGNATURES_MESSAGE, warnings[0].message)
self.assertEqual('error', warnings[0].type)
self.assertEqual([
os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST2.png.sha1'),
os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST2.png.sha1')
], warnings[0].items)
# Add four new strings. Should have four warnings.
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
MockAffectedFile('test.grd',
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS2,
self.OLD_GRD_CONTENTS,
action='M'),
MockAffectedFile('part.grdp',
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS2,
self.OLD_GRDP_CONTENTS,
action='M')
])
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertEqual('error', warnings[0].type)
self.assertEqual(self.ADD_SIGNATURES_MESSAGE, warnings[0].message)
self.assertEqual([
os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST1.png.sha1'),
os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST2.png.sha1'),
os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST1.png.sha1'),
os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST2.png.sha1'),
], warnings[0].items)
def testModifiedMessageDescription(self):
# CL modified a message description for a message that does not yet have a
# screenshot. Should not warn.
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
MockAffectedFile('part.grdp',
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS3,
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS4,
action='M')
])
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
# CL modified a message description for a message that already has a
# screenshot. Should not warn.
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
MockAffectedFile('part.grdp',
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS3,
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS4,
action='M'),
MockFile(os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST1.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1,
action='A')
])
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testModifiedMessageMeaning(self):
# CL modified a message meaning for a message that does not yet have a
# screenshot. Should warn.
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
MockAffectedFile('part.grdp',
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS5,
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS6,
action='M')
])
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
# CL modified a message meaning for a message that already has a
# screenshot. Should not warn.
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
MockAffectedFile('part.grdp',
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS5,
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS6,
action='M'),
MockFile(os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST1.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1,
action='A')
])
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testModifiedIntroducedInvalidSha1(self):
# CL modified a message and the sha1 file changed to invalid
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
MockAffectedFile('part.grdp',
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS5,
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS6,
action='M'),
MockAffectedFile(os.path.join('part_grdp',
'IDS_PART_TEST1.png.sha1'),
('some invalid sha1', ),
self.VALID_SHA1,
action='M')
])
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
def testPngAddedSha1NotAdded(self):
# CL added one new message in a grd file and added the png file associated
# with it, but did not add the corresponding sha1 file. This should warn
# twice:
# - Once for the added png file (because we don't want developers to upload
# actual images)
# - Once for the missing .sha1 file
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
MockAffectedFile('test.grd',
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS1,
self.OLD_GRD_CONTENTS,
action='M'),
MockAffectedFile(os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST1.png'),
'binary',
action='A')
])
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(2, len(warnings))
self.assertEqual('error', warnings[0].type)
self.assertEqual(self.DO_NOT_UPLOAD_PNG_MESSAGE, warnings[0].message)
self.assertEqual([os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST1.png')],
warnings[0].items)
self.assertEqual('error', warnings[1].type)
self.assertEqual(self.ADD_SIGNATURES_MESSAGE, warnings[1].message)
self.assertEqual([os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST1.png.sha1')],
warnings[1].items)
# CL added two messages (one in grd, one in grdp) and added the png files
# associated with the messages, but did not add the corresponding sha1
# files. This should warn twice:
# - Once for the added png files (because we don't want developers to upload
# actual images)
# - Once for the missing .sha1 files
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
# Modified files:
MockAffectedFile('test.grd',
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS1,
self.OLD_GRD_CONTENTS,
action='M'),
MockAffectedFile('part.grdp',
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS1,
self.OLD_GRDP_CONTENTS,
action='M'),
# Added files:
MockAffectedFile(os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST1.png'),
'binary',
action='A'),
MockAffectedFile(os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST1.png'),
'binary',
action='A')
])
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(2, len(warnings))
self.assertEqual('error', warnings[0].type)
self.assertEqual(self.DO_NOT_UPLOAD_PNG_MESSAGE, warnings[0].message)
self.assertEqual([
os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST1.png'),
os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST1.png')
], warnings[0].items)
self.assertEqual('error', warnings[0].type)
self.assertEqual(self.ADD_SIGNATURES_MESSAGE, warnings[1].message)
self.assertEqual([
os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST1.png.sha1'),
os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST1.png.sha1')
], warnings[1].items)
def testScreenshotsWithSha1(self):
# CL added four messages (two each in a grd and grdp) and their
# corresponding .sha1 files. No warnings.
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
# Modified files:
MockAffectedFile('test.grd',
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS2,
self.OLD_GRD_CONTENTS,
action='M'),
MockAffectedFile('part.grdp',
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS2,
self.OLD_GRDP_CONTENTS,
action='M'),
# Added files:
MockFile(os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST1.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1,
action='A'),
MockFile(os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST2.png.sha1'),
('0000000000000000000000000000000000000000', ''),
action='A'),
MockFile(os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST1.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1,
action='A'),
MockFile(os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST2.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1,
action='A'),
])
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual([], warnings)
def testScreenshotsWithInvalidSha1(self):
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
# Modified files:
MockAffectedFile('test.grd',
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS2,
self.OLD_GRD_CONTENTS,
action='M'),
MockAffectedFile('part.grdp',
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS2,
self.OLD_GRDP_CONTENTS,
action='M'),
# Added files:
MockFile(os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST1.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1,
action='A'),
MockFile(os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST2.png.sha1'),
('‰PNG', 'test'),
action='A'),
MockFile(os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST1.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1,
action='A'),
MockFile(os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST2.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1,
action='A'),
])
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertEqual('error', warnings[0].type)
self.assertEqual(self.SHA1_FORMAT_MESSAGE, warnings[0].message)
self.assertEqual([os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST2.png.sha1')],
warnings[0].items)
def testScreenshotsRemovedWithSha1(self):
# Replace new contents with old contents in grd and grp files, removing
# IDS_TEST1, IDS_TEST2, IDS_PART_TEST1 and IDS_PART_TEST2.
# Should warn to remove the sha1 files associated with these strings.
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
# Modified files:
MockAffectedFile(
'test.grd',
self.OLD_GRD_CONTENTS, # new_contents
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS2, # old_contents
action='M'),
MockAffectedFile(
'part.grdp',
self.OLD_GRDP_CONTENTS, # new_contents
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS2, # old_contents
action='M'),
# Unmodified files:
MockFile(os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST1.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1, ''),
MockFile(os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST2.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1, ''),
MockFile(os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST1.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1, ''),
MockFile(os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST2.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1, '')
])
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertEqual('error', warnings[0].type)
self.assertEqual(self.REMOVE_SIGNATURES_MESSAGE, warnings[0].message)
self.assertEqual([
os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST1.png.sha1'),
os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST2.png.sha1'),
os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST1.png.sha1'),
os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST2.png.sha1')
], warnings[0].items)
# Same as above, but this time one of the .sha1 files is also removed.
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
# Modified files:
MockAffectedFile(
'test.grd',
self.OLD_GRD_CONTENTS, # new_contents
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS2, # old_contents
action='M'),
MockAffectedFile(
'part.grdp',
self.OLD_GRDP_CONTENTS, # new_contents
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS2, # old_contents
action='M'),
# Unmodified files:
MockFile(os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST1.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1, ''),
MockFile(os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST1.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1, ''),
# Deleted files:
MockAffectedFile(os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST2.png.sha1'),
'',
'old_contents',
action='D'),
MockAffectedFile(os.path.join('part_grdp',
'IDS_PART_TEST2.png.sha1'),
'',
'old_contents',
action='D')
])
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertEqual('error', warnings[0].type)
self.assertEqual(self.REMOVE_SIGNATURES_MESSAGE, warnings[0].message)
self.assertEqual([
os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST1.png.sha1'),
os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST1.png.sha1')
], warnings[0].items)
# Remove all sha1 files. There should be no warnings.
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
# Modified files:
MockAffectedFile('test.grd',
self.OLD_GRD_CONTENTS,
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS2,
action='M'),
MockAffectedFile('part.grdp',
self.OLD_GRDP_CONTENTS,
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS2,
action='M'),
# Deleted files:
MockFile(os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST1.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1,
action='D'),
MockFile(os.path.join('test_grd', 'IDS_TEST2.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1,
action='D'),
MockFile(os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST1.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1,
action='D'),
MockFile(os.path.join('part_grdp', 'IDS_PART_TEST2.png.sha1'),
self.VALID_SHA1,
action='D')
])
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual([], warnings)
def testIcuSyntax(self):
# Add valid ICU syntax string. Should not raise an error.
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
MockAffectedFile('test.grd',
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK2,
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS1,
action='M'),
MockAffectedFile('part.grdp',
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK2,
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS1,
action='M')
])
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
# We expect no ICU syntax errors.
icu_errors = [
e for e in results if e.message == self.ICU_SYNTAX_ERROR_MESSAGE
]
self.assertEqual(0, len(icu_errors))
# Valid changes in ICU syntax. Should not raise an error.
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
MockAffectedFile('test.grd',
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK2,
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK1,
action='M'),
MockAffectedFile('part.grdp',
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK2,
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK1,
action='M')
])
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
# We expect no ICU syntax errors.
icu_errors = [
e for e in results if e.message == self.ICU_SYNTAX_ERROR_MESSAGE
]
self.assertEqual(0, len(icu_errors))
# Valid changes in ICU syntax. Should not raise an error.
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
MockAffectedFile('test.grd',
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK3,
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK1,
action='M'),
MockAffectedFile('part.grdp',
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK3,
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK1,
action='M')
])
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
# We expect no ICU syntax errors.
icu_errors = [
e for e in results if e.message == self.ICU_SYNTAX_ERROR_MESSAGE
]
self.assertEqual(0, len(icu_errors))
# Add invalid ICU syntax strings. Should raise two errors.
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
MockAffectedFile('test.grd',
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_ERROR,
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS1,
action='M'),
MockAffectedFile('part.grdp',
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_ERROR,
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS1,
action='M')
])
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
# We expect 2 ICU syntax errors.
icu_errors = [
e for e in results if e.message == self.ICU_SYNTAX_ERROR_MESSAGE
]
self.assertEqual(1, len(icu_errors))
self.assertEqual([
'IDS_TEST1: This message looks like an ICU plural, but does not follow '
'ICU syntax.',
'IDS_PART_TEST1: Variant "= 1" is not valid for plural message'
], icu_errors[0].items)
# Change two strings to have ICU syntax errors. Should raise two errors.
input_api = self.makeInputApi([
MockAffectedFile('test.grd',
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_ERROR,
self.NEW_GRD_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK1,
action='M'),
MockAffectedFile('part.grdp',
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_ERROR,
self.NEW_GRDP_CONTENTS_ICU_SYNTAX_OK1,
action='M')
])
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckStrings(input_api, MockOutputApi())
# We expect 2 ICU syntax errors.
icu_errors = [
e for e in results if e.message == self.ICU_SYNTAX_ERROR_MESSAGE
]
self.assertEqual(1, len(icu_errors))
self.assertEqual([
'IDS_TEST1: This message looks like an ICU plural, but does not follow '
'ICU syntax.',
'IDS_PART_TEST1: Variant "= 1" is not valid for plural message'
], icu_errors[0].items)
class TranslationExpectationsTest(unittest.TestCase):
ERROR_MESSAGE_FORMAT = (
"Failed to get a list of translatable grd files. "
"This happens when:\n"
" - One of the modified grd or grdp files cannot be parsed or\n"
" - %s is not updated.\n"
"Stack:\n")
REPO_ROOT = os.path.join('tools', 'translation', 'testdata')
# This lists all .grd files under REPO_ROOT.
EXPECTATIONS = os.path.join(REPO_ROOT, "translation_expectations.pyl")
# This lists all .grd files under REPO_ROOT except unlisted.grd.
EXPECTATIONS_WITHOUT_UNLISTED_FILE = os.path.join(
REPO_ROOT, "translation_expectations_without_unlisted_file.pyl")
# Tests that the presubmit doesn't return when no grd or grdp files are
# modified.
def testExpectationsNoModifiedGrd(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('not_used.txt',
'not used',
'not used',
action='M')
]
# Fake list of all grd files in the repo. This list is missing all grd/grdps
# under tools/translation/testdata. This is OK because the presubmit won't
# run in the first place since there are no modified grd/grps in input_api.
grd_files = ['doesnt_exist_doesnt_matter.grd']
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckTranslationExpectations(
input_api, MockOutputApi(), self.REPO_ROOT, self.EXPECTATIONS,
grd_files)
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
# Tests that the list of files passed to the presubmit matches the list of
# files in the expectations.
def testExpectationsSuccess(self):
# Mock input file list needs a grd or grdp file in order to run the
# presubmit. The file itself doesn't matter.
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('dummy.grd', 'not used', 'not used', action='M')
]
# List of all grd files in the repo.
grd_files = [
'test.grd', 'unlisted.grd', 'not_translated.grd', 'internal.grd'
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckTranslationExpectations(
input_api, MockOutputApi(), self.REPO_ROOT, self.EXPECTATIONS,
grd_files)
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
# Tests that the list of files passed to the presubmit does not
# contain duplicate basenames.
def testExpectationsSuccess(self):
# Mock input file list needs a grd or grdp file in order to run the
# presubmit. The file itself doesn't matter.
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('dummy.grd', 'not used', 'not used', action='M')
]
# List of all grd files in the repo.
grd_files = [
'dir1/test.grd', 'unlisted.grd', 'not_translated.grd',
'internal.grd', 'dir2/test.grd'
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckTranslationExpectations(
input_api, MockOutputApi(), self.REPO_ROOT, self.EXPECTATIONS,
grd_files)
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertTrue(
("Multiple string files have the same basename. "
"This will result in missing translations. "
"Files: dir1/test.grd, dir2/test.grd") in warnings[0].message)
# Tests that the presubmit warns when a file is listed in expectations, but
# does not actually exist.
def testExpectationsMissingFile(self):
# Mock input file list needs a grd or grdp file in order to run the
# presubmit.
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('dummy.grd', 'not used', 'not used', action='M')
]
# unlisted.grd is listed under tools/translation/testdata but is not
# included in translation expectations.
grd_files = ['unlisted.grd', 'not_translated.grd', 'internal.grd']
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckTranslationExpectations(
input_api, MockOutputApi(), self.REPO_ROOT, self.EXPECTATIONS,
grd_files)
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertTrue(warnings[0].message.startswith(
self.ERROR_MESSAGE_FORMAT % self.EXPECTATIONS))
self.assertTrue(
("test.grd is listed in the translation expectations, "
"but this grd file does not exist") in warnings[0].message)
# Tests that the presubmit warns when a file is not listed in expectations but
# does actually exist.
def testExpectationsUnlistedFile(self):
# Mock input file list needs a grd or grdp file in order to run the
# presubmit.
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('dummy.grd', 'not used', 'not used', action='M')
]
# unlisted.grd is listed under tools/translation/testdata but is not
# included in translation expectations.
grd_files = [
'test.grd', 'unlisted.grd', 'not_translated.grd', 'internal.grd'
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckTranslationExpectations(
input_api, MockOutputApi(), self.REPO_ROOT,
self.EXPECTATIONS_WITHOUT_UNLISTED_FILE, grd_files)
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertTrue(warnings[0].message.startswith(
self.ERROR_MESSAGE_FORMAT %
self.EXPECTATIONS_WITHOUT_UNLISTED_FILE))
self.assertTrue(("unlisted.grd appears to be translatable "
"(because it contains <file> or <message> elements), "
"but is not listed in the translation expectations."
) in warnings[0].message)
# Tests that the presubmit warns twice:
# - for a non-existing file listed in expectations
# - for an existing file not listed in expectations
def testMultipleWarnings(self):
# Mock input file list needs a grd or grdp file in order to run the
# presubmit.
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('dummy.grd', 'not used', 'not used', action='M')
]
# unlisted.grd is listed under tools/translation/testdata but is not
# included in translation expectations.
# test.grd is not listed under tools/translation/testdata but is included
# in translation expectations.
grd_files = ['unlisted.grd', 'not_translated.grd', 'internal.grd']
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckTranslationExpectations(
input_api, MockOutputApi(), self.REPO_ROOT,
self.EXPECTATIONS_WITHOUT_UNLISTED_FILE, grd_files)
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
self.assertTrue(warnings[0].message.startswith(
self.ERROR_MESSAGE_FORMAT %
self.EXPECTATIONS_WITHOUT_UNLISTED_FILE))
self.assertTrue(("unlisted.grd appears to be translatable "
"(because it contains <file> or <message> elements), "
"but is not listed in the translation expectations."
) in warnings[0].message)
self.assertTrue(
("test.grd is listed in the translation expectations, "
"but this grd file does not exist") in warnings[0].message)
class DISABLETypoInTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testPositive(self):
# Verify the typo "DISABLE_" instead of "DISABLED_" in various contexts
# where the desire is to disable a test.
tests = [
# Disabled on one platform:
'#if defined(OS_WIN)\n'
'#define MAYBE_FoobarTest DISABLE_FoobarTest\n'
'#else\n'
'#define MAYBE_FoobarTest FoobarTest\n'
'#endif\n',
# Disabled on one platform spread cross lines:
'#if defined(OS_WIN)\n'
'#define MAYBE_FoobarTest \\\n'
' DISABLE_FoobarTest\n'
'#else\n'
'#define MAYBE_FoobarTest FoobarTest\n'
'#endif\n',
# Disabled on all platforms:
' TEST_F(FoobarTest, DISABLE_Foo)\n{\n}',
# Disabled on all platforms but multiple lines
' TEST_F(FoobarTest,\n DISABLE_foo){\n}\n',
]
for test in tests:
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('some/path/foo_unittest.cc', test.splitlines()),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoDISABLETypoInTests(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(
1,
len(results),
msg=('expected len(results) == 1 but got %d in test: %s' %
(len(results), test)))
self.assertTrue(
'foo_unittest.cc' in results[0].message,
msg=(
'expected foo_unittest.cc in message but got %s in test %s'
% (results[0].message, test)))
def testIgnoreNotTestFiles(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('some/path/foo.cc', 'TEST_F(FoobarTest, DISABLE_Foo)'),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoDISABLETypoInTests(mock_input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
def testIgnoreDeletedFiles(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('some/path/foo.cc', 'TEST_F(FoobarTest, Foo)',
action='D'),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoDISABLETypoInTests(mock_input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
class ForgettingMAYBEInTests(unittest.TestCase):
def testPositive(self):
test = ('#if defined(HAS_ENERGY)\n'
'#define MAYBE_CastExplosion DISABLED_CastExplosion\n'
'#else\n'
'#define MAYBE_CastExplosion CastExplosion\n'
'#endif\n'
'TEST_F(ArchWizard, CastExplosion) {\n'
'#if defined(ARCH_PRIEST_IN_PARTY)\n'
'#define MAYBE_ArchPriest ArchPriest\n'
'#else\n'
'#define MAYBE_ArchPriest DISABLED_ArchPriest\n'
'#endif\n'
'TEST_F(ArchPriest, CastNaturesBounty) {\n'
'#if !defined(CRUSADER_IN_PARTY)\n'
'#define MAYBE_Crusader \\\n'
' DISABLED_Crusader \n'
'#else\n'
'#define MAYBE_Crusader \\\n'
' Crusader\n'
'#endif\n'
' TEST_F(\n'
' Crusader,\n'
' CastTaunt) { }\n'
'#if defined(LEARNED_BASIC_SKILLS)\n'
'#define MAYBE_CastSteal \\\n'
' DISABLED_CastSteal \n'
'#else\n'
'#define MAYBE_CastSteal \\\n'
' CastSteal\n'
'#endif\n'
' TEST_F(\n'
' ThiefClass,\n'
' CastSteal) { }\n')
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('fantasyworld/classes_unittest.cc', test.splitlines()),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckForgettingMAYBEInTests(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(4, len(results))
self.assertTrue('CastExplosion' in results[0].message)
self.assertTrue(
'fantasyworld/classes_unittest.cc:2' in results[0].message)
self.assertTrue('ArchPriest' in results[1].message)
self.assertTrue(
'fantasyworld/classes_unittest.cc:8' in results[1].message)
self.assertTrue('Crusader' in results[2].message)
self.assertTrue(
'fantasyworld/classes_unittest.cc:14' in results[2].message)
self.assertTrue('CastSteal' in results[3].message)
self.assertTrue(
'fantasyworld/classes_unittest.cc:24' in results[3].message)
def testNegative(self):
test = ('#if defined(HAS_ENERGY)\n'
'#define MAYBE_CastExplosion DISABLED_CastExplosion\n'
'#else\n'
'#define MAYBE_CastExplosion CastExplosion\n'
'#endif\n'
'TEST_F(ArchWizard, MAYBE_CastExplosion) {\n'
'#if defined(ARCH_PRIEST_IN_PARTY)\n'
'#define MAYBE_ArchPriest ArchPriest\n'
'#else\n'
'#define MAYBE_ArchPriest DISABLED_ArchPriest\n'
'#endif\n'
'TEST_F(MAYBE_ArchPriest, CastNaturesBounty) {\n'
'#if !defined(CRUSADER_IN_PARTY)\n'
'#define MAYBE_Crusader \\\n'
' DISABLED_Crusader \n'
'#else\n'
'#define MAYBE_Crusader \\\n'
' Crusader\n'
'#endif\n'
' TEST_F(\n'
' MAYBE_Crusader,\n'
' CastTaunt) { }\n'
'#if defined(LEARNED_BASIC_SKILLS)\n'
'#define MAYBE_CastSteal \\\n'
' DISABLED_CastSteal \n'
'#else\n'
'#define MAYBE_CastSteal \\\n'
' CastSteal\n'
'#endif\n'
' TEST_F(\n'
' ThiefClass,\n'
' MAYBE_CastSteal) { }\n')
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockFile('fantasyworld/classes_unittest.cc', test.splitlines()),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckForgettingMAYBEInTests(
mock_input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
class CheckFuzzTargetsTest(unittest.TestCase):
def _check(self, files):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = []
for fname, contents in files.items():
mock_input_api.files.append(MockFile(fname, contents.splitlines()))
return PRESUBMIT.CheckFuzzTargetsOnUpload(mock_input_api,
MockOutputApi())
def testLibFuzzerSourcesIgnored(self):
results = self._check({
"third_party/lib/Fuzzer/FuzzerDriver.cpp":
"LLVMFuzzerInitialize",
})
self.assertEqual(results, [])
def testNonCodeFilesIgnored(self):
results = self._check({
"README.md": "LLVMFuzzerInitialize",
})
self.assertEqual(results, [])
def testNoErrorHeaderPresent(self):
results = self._check({
"fuzzer.cc":
("#include \"testing/libfuzzer/libfuzzer_exports.h\"\n" +
"LLVMFuzzerInitialize")
})
self.assertEqual(results, [])
def testErrorMissingHeader(self):
results = self._check({"fuzzer.cc": "LLVMFuzzerInitialize"})
self.assertEqual(len(results), 1)
self.assertEqual(results[0].items, ['fuzzer.cc'])
class SetNoParentTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testSetNoParentTopLevelAllowed(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('goat/OWNERS', [
'set noparent',
'jochen@chromium.org',
])
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckSetNoParent(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual([], errors)
def testSetNoParentMissing(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('services/goat/OWNERS', [
'set noparent',
'jochen@chromium.org',
'per-file *.json=set noparent',
'per-file *.json=jochen@chromium.org',
])
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckSetNoParent(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
self.assertTrue('goat/OWNERS:1' in errors[0].long_text)
self.assertTrue('goat/OWNERS:3' in errors[0].long_text)
def testSetNoParentWithCorrectRule(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('services/goat/OWNERS', [
'set noparent',
'file://ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS',
'per-file *.json=set noparent',
'per-file *.json=file://ipc/SECURITY_OWNERS',
])
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckSetNoParent(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual([], errors)
class MojomStabilityCheckTest(unittest.TestCase):
def runTestWithAffectedFiles(self, affected_files, footers={}):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = affected_files
mock_input_api.change.footers = footers
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
return PRESUBMIT.CheckStableMojomChanges(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
def testNoMojomChangePasses(self):
errors = self.runTestWithAffectedFiles([
MockAffectedFile('foo/foo.cc', ['// world'],
old_contents=['// Hello'])
])
self.assertEqual([], errors)
def testNoMojomChangeWithUnnecessaryFooterFails(self):
errors = self.runTestWithAffectedFiles([
MockAffectedFile('foo/foo.cc', ['// world'],
old_contents=['// Hello'])
],
footers={
'No-Stable-Mojom-Checks':
['true'],
})
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
self.assertTrue('unnecessary git footer' in errors[0].message)
def testSafeChangePasses(self):
errors = self.runTestWithAffectedFiles([
MockAffectedFile(
'foo/foo.mojom',
['[Stable] struct S { [MinVersion=1] int32 x; };'],
old_contents=['[Stable] struct S {};'])
])
self.assertEqual([], errors)
def testSafeChangeWithUnnecessaryFooterFails(self):
errors = self.runTestWithAffectedFiles([
MockAffectedFile('foo/foo.mojom',
['[Stable] struct S { int32 x; };'],
old_contents=['[Stable] struct S { int32 y; };'])
],
footers={
'No-Stable-Mojom-Checks':
['true'],
})
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
self.assertTrue('unnecessary git footer' in errors[0].message)
def testBadChangeFails(self):
errors = self.runTestWithAffectedFiles([
MockAffectedFile('foo/foo.mojom',
['[Stable] struct S { int32 x; };'],
old_contents=['[Stable] struct S {};'])
])
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
self.assertTrue('changed in a way that breaks backward compatibility.'
in errors[0].message)
def testBadChangeButExplicitlyAllowed(self):
errors = self.runTestWithAffectedFiles([
MockAffectedFile('foo/foo.mojom',
['[Stable] struct S { int32 x; };'],
old_contents=['[Stable] struct S {};'])
],
footers={
'No-Stable-Mojom-Checks':
['true'],
})
self.assertEqual([], errors)
def testBadChangeButExplicitlyAllowedWithWrongValue(self):
errors = self.runTestWithAffectedFiles([
MockAffectedFile('foo/foo.mojom',
['[Stable] struct S { int32 x; };'],
old_contents=['[Stable] struct S {};'])
],
footers={
'No-Stable-Mojom-Checks':
['🐮'],
})
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
self.assertTrue('only accepts the value "true"' in errors[0].message)
def testDeletedFile(self):
"""Regression test for https://crbug.com/1091407."""
errors = self.runTestWithAffectedFiles([
MockAffectedFile('a.mojom', [],
old_contents=['struct S {};'],
action='D'),
MockAffectedFile(
'b.mojom', ['struct S {}; struct T { S s; };'],
old_contents=['import "a.mojom"; struct T { S s; };'])
])
self.assertEqual([], errors)
class CheckForUseOfChromeAppsDeprecationsTest(unittest.TestCase):
ERROR_MSG_PIECE = 'technologies which will soon be deprecated'
# Each positive test is also a naive negative test for the other cases.
def testWarningNMF(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
'foo.NMF', ['"program"', '"Z":"content"', 'B'],
['"program"', 'B'],
scm_diff='\n'.join([
'--- foo.NMF.old 2020-12-02 20:40:54.430676385 +0100',
'+++ foo.NMF.new 2020-12-02 20:41:02.086700197 +0100',
'@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@', ' "program"', '+"Z":"content"', ' B'
]),
action='M')
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForUseOfChromeAppsDeprecations(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
self.assertTrue(self.ERROR_MSG_PIECE in errors[0].message)
self.assertTrue('foo.NMF' in errors[0].message)
def testWarningManifest(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
'manifest.json', ['"app":', '"Z":"content"', 'B'],
['"app":"', 'B'],
scm_diff='\n'.join([
'--- manifest.json.old 2020-12-02 20:40:54.430676385 +0100',
'+++ manifest.json.new 2020-12-02 20:41:02.086700197 +0100',
'@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@', ' "app"', '+"Z":"content"', ' B'
]),
action='M')
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForUseOfChromeAppsDeprecations(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
self.assertTrue(self.ERROR_MSG_PIECE in errors[0].message)
self.assertTrue('manifest.json' in errors[0].message)
def testOKWarningManifestWithoutApp(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
'manifest.json', ['"name":', '"Z":"content"', 'B'],
['"name":"', 'B'],
scm_diff='\n'.join([
'--- manifest.json.old 2020-12-02 20:40:54.430676385 +0100',
'+++ manifest.json.new 2020-12-02 20:41:02.086700197 +0100',
'@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@', ' "app"', '+"Z":"content"', ' B'
]),
action='M')
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckForUseOfChromeAppsDeprecations(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
class CheckDeprecationOfPreferencesTest(unittest.TestCase):
# Test that a warning is generated if a preference registration is removed
# from a random file.
def testWarning(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
'foo.cc', ['A', 'B'],
['A', 'prefs->RegisterStringPref("foo", "default");', 'B'],
scm_diff='\n'.join([
'--- foo.cc.old 2020-12-02 20:40:54.430676385 +0100',
'+++ foo.cc.new 2020-12-02 20:41:02.086700197 +0100',
'@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@', ' A',
'-prefs->RegisterStringPref("foo", "default");', ' B'
]),
action='M')
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckDeprecationOfPreferences(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
self.assertTrue(
'Discovered possible removal of preference registrations' in
errors[0].message)
# Test that a warning is inhibited if the preference registration was moved
# to the deprecation functions in browser prefs.
def testNoWarningForMigration(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
# RegisterStringPref was removed from foo.cc.
MockAffectedFile(
'foo.cc', ['A', 'B'],
['A', 'prefs->RegisterStringPref("foo", "default");', 'B'],
scm_diff='\n'.join([
'--- foo.cc.old 2020-12-02 20:40:54.430676385 +0100',
'+++ foo.cc.new 2020-12-02 20:41:02.086700197 +0100',
'@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@', ' A',
'-prefs->RegisterStringPref("foo", "default");', ' B'
]),
action='M'),
# But the preference was properly migrated.
MockAffectedFile(
'chrome/browser/prefs/browser_prefs.cc', [
'// BEGIN_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_LOCAL_STATE_PREFS',
'// END_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_LOCAL_STATE_PREFS',
'// BEGIN_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_PROFILE_PREFS',
'prefs->RegisterStringPref("foo", "default");',
'// END_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_PROFILE_PREFS',
], [
'// BEGIN_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_LOCAL_STATE_PREFS',
'// END_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_LOCAL_STATE_PREFS',
'// BEGIN_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_PROFILE_PREFS',
'// END_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_PROFILE_PREFS',
],
scm_diff='\n'.join([
'--- browser_prefs.cc.old 2020-12-02 20:51:40.812686731 +0100',
'+++ browser_prefs.cc.new 2020-12-02 20:52:02.936755539 +0100',
'@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@',
' // END_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_LOCAL_STATE_PREFS',
' // BEGIN_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_PROFILE_PREFS',
'+prefs->RegisterStringPref("foo", "default");',
' // END_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_PROFILE_PREFS'
]),
action='M'),
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckDeprecationOfPreferences(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
# Test that a warning is NOT inhibited if the preference registration was
# moved to a place outside of the migration functions in browser_prefs.cc
def testWarningForImproperMigration(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
# RegisterStringPref was removed from foo.cc.
MockAffectedFile(
'foo.cc', ['A', 'B'],
['A', 'prefs->RegisterStringPref("foo", "default");', 'B'],
scm_diff='\n'.join([
'--- foo.cc.old 2020-12-02 20:40:54.430676385 +0100',
'+++ foo.cc.new 2020-12-02 20:41:02.086700197 +0100',
'@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@', ' A',
'-prefs->RegisterStringPref("foo", "default");', ' B'
]),
action='M'),
# The registration call was moved to a place in browser_prefs.cc that
# is outside the migration functions.
MockAffectedFile(
'chrome/browser/prefs/browser_prefs.cc', [
'prefs->RegisterStringPref("foo", "default");',
'// BEGIN_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_LOCAL_STATE_PREFS',
'// END_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_LOCAL_STATE_PREFS',
'// BEGIN_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_PROFILE_PREFS',
'// END_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_PROFILE_PREFS',
], [
'// BEGIN_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_LOCAL_STATE_PREFS',
'// END_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_LOCAL_STATE_PREFS',
'// BEGIN_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_PROFILE_PREFS',
'// END_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_PROFILE_PREFS',
],
scm_diff='\n'.join([
'--- browser_prefs.cc.old 2020-12-02 20:51:40.812686731 +0100',
'+++ browser_prefs.cc.new 2020-12-02 20:52:02.936755539 +0100',
'@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@',
'+prefs->RegisterStringPref("foo", "default");',
' // BEGIN_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_LOCAL_STATE_PREFS',
' // END_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_LOCAL_STATE_PREFS'
]),
action='M'),
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckDeprecationOfPreferences(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
self.assertTrue(
'Discovered possible removal of preference registrations' in
errors[0].message)
# Check that the presubmit fails if a marker line in browser_prefs.cc is
# deleted.
def testDeletedMarkerRaisesError(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
'chrome/browser/prefs/browser_prefs.cc',
[
'// BEGIN_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_LOCAL_STATE_PREFS',
'// END_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_LOCAL_STATE_PREFS',
'// BEGIN_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_PROFILE_PREFS',
# The following line is deleted for this test
# '// END_MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_PROFILE_PREFS',
])
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckDeprecationOfPreferences(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
self.assertEqual(
'Broken .*MIGRATE_OBSOLETE_.*_PREFS markers in browser_prefs.cc.',
errors[0].message)
class CheckCrosApiNeedBrowserTestTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testWarning(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('chromeos/crosapi/mojom/example.mojom', [],
action='A'),
]
result = PRESUBMIT.CheckCrosApiNeedBrowserTest(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(result))
self.assertEqual(result[0].type, 'warning')
def testNoWarningWithBrowserTest(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('chromeos/crosapi/mojom/example.mojom', [],
action='A'),
MockAffectedFile('chrome/example_browsertest.cc', [], action='A'),
]
result = PRESUBMIT.CheckCrosApiNeedBrowserTest(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(0, len(result))
def testNoWarningModifyCrosapi(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('chromeos/crosapi/mojom/example.mojom', [],
action='M'),
]
result = PRESUBMIT.CheckCrosApiNeedBrowserTest(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(0, len(result))
def testNoWarningAddNonMojomFile(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('chromeos/crosapi/mojom/example.cc', [],
action='A'),
]
result = PRESUBMIT.CheckCrosApiNeedBrowserTest(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(0, len(result))
def testNoWarningNoneRelatedMojom(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('random/folder/example.mojom', [], action='A'),
]
result = PRESUBMIT.CheckCrosApiNeedBrowserTest(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(0, len(result))
class AssertAshOnlyCodeTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testErrorsOnlyOnAshDirectories(self):
files_in_ash = [
MockFile('ash/BUILD.gn', []),
MockFile('chrome/browser/ash/BUILD.gn', []),
]
other_files = [
MockFile('chrome/browser/BUILD.gn', []),
MockFile('chrome/browser/foo/BUILD.gn',
['assert(is_chromeos_ash)']),
]
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = files_in_ash
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckAssertAshOnlyCode(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(2, len(errors))
input_api.files = other_files
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckAssertAshOnlyCode(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
def testDoesNotErrorOnNonGNFiles(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('ash/test.h', ['assert(is_chromeos_ash)']),
MockFile('chrome/browser/ash/test.cc',
['assert(is_chromeos_ash)']),
]
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckAssertAshOnlyCode(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
def testDeletedFile(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('ash/BUILD.gn', []),
MockFile('ash/foo/BUILD.gn', [], action='D'),
]
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckAssertAshOnlyCode(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
def testDoesNotErrorWithAssertion(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('ash/BUILD.gn', ['assert(is_chromeos_ash)']),
MockFile('chrome/browser/ash/BUILD.gn',
['assert(is_chromeos_ash)']),
MockFile('chrome/browser/ash/1/BUILD.gn', ['assert(is_chromeos)']),
MockFile('chrome/browser/ash/2/BUILD.gn',
['assert(is_chromeos_ash)']),
MockFile('chrome/browser/ash/3/BUILD.gn',
['assert(is_chromeos, "test")']),
MockFile('chrome/browser/ash/4/BUILD.gn',
['assert(is_chromeos_ash, "test")']),
]
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckAssertAshOnlyCode(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
class CheckRawPtrUsageTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testAllowedCases(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
# Browser-side files are allowed.
MockAffectedFile('test10/browser/foo.h', ['raw_ptr<int>']),
MockAffectedFile('test11/browser/foo.cc', ['raw_ptr<int>']),
MockAffectedFile('test12/blink/common/foo.cc', ['raw_ptr<int>']),
MockAffectedFile('test13/blink/public/common/foo.cc',
['raw_ptr<int>']),
MockAffectedFile('test14/blink/public/platform/foo.cc',
['raw_ptr<int>']),
# Non-C++ files are allowed.
MockAffectedFile('test20/renderer/foo.md', ['raw_ptr<int>']),
# Renderer code is generally allowed (except specifically
# disallowed directories).
MockAffectedFile('test30/renderer/foo.cc', ['raw_ptr<int>']),
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckRawPtrUsage(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertFalse(errors)
def testDisallowedCases(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('test1/third_party/blink/renderer/core/foo.h',
['raw_ptr<int>']),
MockAffectedFile(
'test2/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/heap/foo.cc',
['raw_ptr<int>']),
MockAffectedFile(
'test3/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/wtf/foo.cc',
['raw_ptr<int>']),
MockAffectedFile(
'test4/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/fonts/foo.h',
['raw_ptr<int>']),
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckRawPtrUsage(mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(len(mock_input_api.files), len(errors))
for error in errors:
self.assertTrue(
'raw_ptr<T> should not be used in this renderer code' in
error.message)
class CheckAdvancedMemorySafetyChecksUsageTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testAllowedCases(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
# Non-C++ files are allowed.
MockAffectedFile('test20/renderer/foo.md',
['ADVANCED_MEMORY_SAFETY_CHECKS()']),
# Mentions in a comment are allowed.
MockAffectedFile('test30/renderer/foo.cc',
['//ADVANCED_MEMORY_SAFETY_CHECKS()']),
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckAdvancedMemorySafetyChecksUsage(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertFalse(errors)
def testDisallowedCases(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('test1/foo.h',
['ADVANCED_MEMORY_SAFETY_CHECKS()']),
MockAffectedFile('test2/foo.cc',
['ADVANCED_MEMORY_SAFETY_CHECKS()']),
]
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckAdvancedMemorySafetyChecksUsage(
mock_input_api, mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
self.assertTrue('ADVANCED_MEMORY_SAFETY_CHECKS() macro is managed by'
in errors[0].message)
class AssertPythonShebangTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testError(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('ash/test.py', ['#!/usr/bin/python']),
MockFile('chrome/test.py', ['#!/usr/bin/python2']),
MockFile('third_party/blink/test.py', ['#!/usr/bin/python3']),
MockFile('empty.py', []),
]
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckPythonShebang(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(3, len(errors))
def testNonError(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('chrome/browser/BUILD.gn', ['#!/usr/bin/python']),
MockFile('third_party/blink/web_tests/external/test.py',
['#!/usr/bin/python2']),
MockFile('third_party/test/test.py', ['#!/usr/bin/python3']),
]
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckPythonShebang(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
class VerifyDcheckParentheses(unittest.TestCase):
def testPermissibleUsage(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('okay1.cc', ['DCHECK_IS_ON()']),
MockFile('okay2.cc', ['#if DCHECK_IS_ON()']),
# Other constructs that aren't exactly `DCHECK_IS_ON()` do their
# own thing at their own risk.
MockFile('okay3.cc', ['PA_DCHECK_IS_ON']),
MockFile('okay4.cc', ['#if PA_DCHECK_IS_ON']),
MockFile('okay6.cc', ['PA_BUILDFLAG(PA_DCHECK_IS_ON)']),
]
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckDCHECK_IS_ONHasBraces(input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
def testMissingParentheses(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('bad1.cc', ['DCHECK_IS_ON']),
MockFile('bad2.cc', ['#if DCHECK_IS_ON']),
MockFile('bad3.cc', ['DCHECK_IS_ON && foo']),
]
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckDCHECK_IS_ONHasBraces(input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(3, len(errors))
for error in errors:
self.assertRegex(error.message, r'DCHECK_IS_ON().+parentheses')
class CheckAndroidTestAnnotations(unittest.TestCase):
"""Test the CheckAndroidTestAnnotations presubmit check."""
def testBatchTruePositives(self):
"""Examples of when there is no @Batch or @DoNotBatch is correctly flagged.
"""
mock_input = MockInputApi()
mock_input.files = [
MockFile('path/OneTest.java', ['public class OneTest']),
MockFile('path/TwoTest.java', ['public class TwoTest']),
MockFile('path/ThreeTest.java', [
'@Batch(Batch.PER_CLASS)',
'@RunWith(BaseRobolectricTestRunner.class)',
'public class Three {'
]),
MockFile('path/FourTest.java', [
'@DoNotBatch(reason = "placeholder reason 1")',
'@RunWith(BaseRobolectricTestRunner.class)',
'public class Four {'
]),
]
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckAndroidTestAnnotations(mock_input,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(2, len(errors))
self.assertEqual(2, len(errors[0].items))
self.assertIn('OneTest.java', errors[0].items[0])
self.assertIn('TwoTest.java', errors[0].items[1])
self.assertEqual(2, len(errors[1].items))
self.assertIn('ThreeTest.java', errors[1].items[0])
self.assertIn('FourTest.java', errors[1].items[1])
def testBatchAnnotationsPresent(self):
"""Examples of when there is @Batch or @DoNotBatch is correctly flagged."""
mock_input = MockInputApi()
mock_input.files = [
MockFile('path/OneTest.java',
['@Batch(Batch.PER_CLASS)', 'public class One {']),
MockFile('path/TwoTest.java', [
'@DoNotBatch(reason = "placeholder reasons.")',
'public class Two {'
]),
MockFile('path/ThreeTest.java', [
'@Batch(Batch.PER_CLASS)',
'public class Three extends BaseTestA {'
], [
'@Batch(Batch.PER_CLASS)',
'public class Three extends BaseTestB {'
]),
MockFile('path/FourTest.java', [
'@DoNotBatch(reason = "placeholder reason 1")',
'public class Four extends BaseTestA {'
], [
'@DoNotBatch(reason = "placeholder reason 2")',
'public class Four extends BaseTestB {'
]),
MockFile('path/FiveTest.java', [
'import androidx.test.uiautomator.UiDevice;',
'public class Five extends BaseTestA {'
], [
'import androidx.test.uiautomator.UiDevice;',
'public class Five extends BaseTestB {'
]),
MockFile('path/SixTest.java', [
'@RunWith(BaseRobolectricTestRunner.class)',
'public class Six extends BaseTestA {'
], [
'@RunWith(BaseRobolectricTestRunner.class)',
'public class Six extends BaseTestB {'
]),
MockFile('path/SevenTest.java', [
'@RunWith(BaseRobolectricTestRunner.class)',
'public class Seven extends BaseTestA {'
], [
'@RunWith(BaseRobolectricTestRunner.class)',
'public class Seven extends BaseTestB {'
]),
MockFile(
'path/OtherClass.java',
['public class OtherClass {'],
),
MockFile('path/PRESUBMIT.py', [
'@Batch(Batch.PER_CLASS)',
'@DoNotBatch(reason = "placeholder reason)'
]),
MockFile(
'path/AnnotationTest.java',
['public @interface SomeAnnotation {'],
),
]
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckAndroidTestAnnotations(mock_input,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(errors))
def testWrongRobolectricTestRunner(self):
mock_input = MockInputApi()
mock_input.files = [
MockFile('path/OneTest.java', [
'@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner.class)',
'public class ThreeTest {'
]),
MockFile('path/TwoTest.java', [
'import org.chromium.base.test.BaseRobolectricTestRule;',
'@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner.class)',
'public class TwoTest {'
]),
MockFile('path/ThreeTest.java', [
'@RunWith(FooRobolectricTestRunner.class)',
'public class ThreeTest {'
]),
MockFile('webapks/FourTest.java', [
'@RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner.class)',
'public class ThreeTest {'
]),
]
errors = PRESUBMIT.CheckAndroidTestAnnotations(mock_input,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors))
self.assertEqual(1, len(errors[0].items))
self.assertIn('OneTest.java', errors[0].items[0])
class CheckAndroidNullAwayAnnotatedClasses(unittest.TestCase):
"""Test the _CheckAndroidNullAwayAnnotatedClasses presubmit check."""
def testDetectsInClasses(self):
"""Tests that missing @NullMarked or @NullUnmarked are correctly flagged in classes."""
mock_input = MockInputApi()
mock_input.files = [
MockFile('path/OneMissing.java', ['public class OneMissing']),
MockFile('path/TwoMarked.java', [
'@NullMarked',
'public class TwoMarked {',
]),
MockFile('path/ThreeMarked.java', [
'@NullUnmarked',
'public class ThreeMarked {',
]),
MockFile('path/FourMissing.java', ['class FourMissing']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT._CheckAndroidNullAwayAnnotatedClasses(
mock_input, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual('error', results[0].type)
self.assertEqual(2, len(results[0].items))
self.assertIn('OneMissing.java', results[0].items[0])
self.assertIn('FourMissing.java', results[0].items[1])
def testDetectsInAnnotations(self):
"""Tests that missing @NullMarked or @NullUnmarked are correctly flagged in annotations."""
mock_input = MockInputApi()
mock_input.files = [
MockFile('path/OneMissing.java', ['@interface OneMissing']),
MockFile('path/TwoMarked.java', [
'@NullMarked',
'@interface TwoMarked {',
]),
]
results = PRESUBMIT._CheckAndroidNullAwayAnnotatedClasses(
mock_input, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual('error', results[0].type)
self.assertEqual(1, len(results[0].items))
self.assertIn('OneMissing.java', results[0].items[0])
def testDetectsInInterfaces(self):
"""Tests that missing @NullMarked or @NullUnmarked are correctly flagged in interfaces."""
mock_input = MockInputApi()
mock_input.files = [
MockFile('path/OneMissing.java', ['interface OneMissing']),
MockFile('path/TwoMarked.java', [
'@NullMarked',
'interface TwoMarked {',
]),
]
results = PRESUBMIT._CheckAndroidNullAwayAnnotatedClasses(
mock_input, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual('error', results[0].type)
self.assertEqual(1, len(results[0].items))
self.assertIn('OneMissing.java', results[0].items[0])
def testOnlyChecksAddedFiles(self):
"""Tests that missing @NullMarked or @NullUnmarked is only flagged in newly added files."""
mock_input = MockInputApi()
mock_input.files = [
MockFile('path/OneMissing.java', ['public class OneMissing'],
action='M'),
]
results = PRESUBMIT._CheckAndroidNullAwayAnnotatedClasses(
mock_input, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
def testExcludesTests(self):
"""Tests that missing @NullMarked or @NullUnmarked are not flagged in tests."""
mock_input = MockInputApi()
mock_input.files = [
MockFile('path/OneTest.java', ['public class OneTest']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT._CheckAndroidNullAwayAnnotatedClasses(
mock_input, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
def testExcludesTestSupport(self):
"""Tests that missing @NullMarked or @NullUnmarked are not flagged in test support classes."""
mock_input = MockInputApi()
mock_input.files = [
MockFile('path/test/Two.java', ['public class Two']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT._CheckAndroidNullAwayAnnotatedClasses(
mock_input, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
class AssertNoJsInIosTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testErrorJs(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('components/feature/ios/resources/script.js', []),
MockFile('ios/chrome/feature/resources/script.js', []),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoJsInIos(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual('error', results[0].type)
self.assertEqual(2, len(results[0].items))
def testNonError(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('chrome/resources/script.js', []),
MockFile('components/feature/ios/resources/script.ts', []),
MockFile('ios/chrome/feature/resources/script.ts', []),
MockFile('ios/web/feature/resources/script.ts', []),
MockFile('ios/third_party/script.js', []),
MockFile('third_party/ios/script.js', []),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoJsInIos(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
def testExistingFilesWarningOnly(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('ios/chrome/feature/resources/script.js', [], action='M'),
MockFile('ios/chrome/feature/resources/script2.js', [],
action='D'),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoJsInIos(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual('warning', results[0].type)
self.assertEqual(1, len(results[0].items))
def testMovedScriptWarningOnly(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('ios/chrome/feature/resources/script.js', [], action='D'),
MockFile('ios/chrome/renamed_feature/resources/script.js', [],
action='A'),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoJsInIos(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual('warning', results[0].type)
self.assertEqual(1, len(results[0].items))
class CheckNoAbbreviationInPngFileNameTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testHasAbbreviation(self):
"""test png file names with abbreviation that fails the check"""
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('image_a.png', [], action='A'),
MockFile('image_a_.png', [], action='A'),
MockFile('image_a_name.png', [], action='A'),
MockFile('chrome/ui/feature_name/resources/image_a.png', [],
action='A'),
MockFile('chrome/ui/feature_name/resources/image_a_.png', [],
action='A'),
MockFile('chrome/ui/feature_name/resources/image_a_name.png', [],
action='A'),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoAbbreviationInPngFileName(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual('error', results[0].type)
self.assertEqual(len(input_api.files), len(results[0].items))
def testNoAbbreviation(self):
"""test png file names without abbreviation that passes the check"""
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('a.png', [], action='A'),
MockFile('_a.png', [], action='A'),
MockFile('image.png', [], action='A'),
MockFile('image_ab_.png', [], action='A'),
MockFile('image_ab_name.png', [], action='A'),
# These paths used to fail because `feature_a_name` matched the regex by mistake.
# They should pass now because the path components ahead of the file name are ignored in the check.
MockFile('chrome/ui/feature_a_name/resources/a.png', [],
action='A'),
MockFile('chrome/ui/feature_a_name/resources/_a.png', [],
action='A'),
MockFile('chrome/ui/feature_a_name/resources/image.png', [],
action='A'),
MockFile('chrome/ui/feature_a_name/resources/image_ab_.png', [],
action='A'),
MockFile('chrome/ui/feature_a_name/resources/image_ab_name.png',
[],
action='A'),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoAbbreviationInPngFileName(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
class CheckDanglingUntriagedTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testError(self):
"""Test patch adding dangling pointers are reported"""
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: "description"
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
local_path="foo/foo.cc",
old_contents=["raw_ptr<T>"],
new_contents=["raw_ptr<T, DanglingUntriaged>"],
)
]
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckDanglingUntriaged(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(len(msgs), 1)
self.assertEqual(len(msgs[0].message), 10)
self.assertEqual(
msgs[0].message[0],
"Unexpected new occurrences of `DanglingUntriaged` detected. Please",
)
class CheckDanglingUntriagedTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testError(self):
"""Test patch adding dangling pointers are reported"""
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: "description"
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
local_path="foo/foo.cc",
old_contents=["raw_ptr<T>"],
new_contents=["raw_ptr<T, DanglingUntriaged>"],
)
]
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckDanglingUntriaged(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(len(msgs), 1)
self.assertTrue(
("Unexpected new occurrences of `DanglingUntriaged` detected"
in msgs[0].message))
def testNonCppFile(self):
"""Test patch adding dangling pointers are not reported in non C++ files"""
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: "description"
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
local_path="foo/README.md",
old_contents=[""],
new_contents=["The DanglingUntriaged annotation means"],
)
]
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckDanglingUntriaged(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(len(msgs), 0)
def testDeveloperAcknowledgeInCommitDescription(self):
"""Test patch adding dangling pointers, but acknowledged by the developers
aren't reported"""
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
local_path="foo/foo.cc",
old_contents=["raw_ptr<T>"],
new_contents=["raw_ptr<T, DanglingUntriaged>"],
)
]
mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: (
"DanglingUntriaged-notes: Sorry about this!")
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckDanglingUntriaged(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(len(msgs), 0)
def testDeveloperAcknowledgeInCommitFooter(self):
"""Test patch adding dangling pointers, but acknowledged by the developers
aren't reported"""
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
local_path="foo/foo.cc",
old_contents=["raw_ptr<T>"],
new_contents=["raw_ptr<T, DanglingUntriaged>"],
)
]
mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: "description"
mock_input_api.change.footers["DanglingUntriaged-notes"] = ["Sorry!"]
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckDanglingUntriaged(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(len(msgs), 0)
def testCongrats(self):
"""Test the presubmit congrats users removing dangling pointers"""
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
local_path="foo/foo.cc",
old_contents=["raw_ptr<T, DanglingUntriaged>"],
new_contents=["raw_ptr<T>"],
)
]
mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: (
"This patch fixes some DanglingUntriaged pointers!")
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckDanglingUntriaged(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(len(msgs), 1)
self.assertTrue(
"DanglingUntriaged pointers removed: 1" in msgs[0].message)
self.assertTrue("Thank you!" in msgs[0].message)
def testRenameFile(self):
"""Patch that we do not warn about DanglingUntriaged when moving files"""
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_output_api = MockOutputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
local_path="foo/foo.cc",
old_contents=["raw_ptr<T, DanglingUntriaged>"],
new_contents=[""],
action="D",
),
MockAffectedFile(
local_path="foo/foo.cc",
old_contents=[""],
new_contents=["raw_ptr<T, DanglingUntriaged>"],
action="A",
),
]
mock_input_api.change.DescriptionText = lambda: (
"This patch moves files")
msgs = PRESUBMIT.CheckDanglingUntriaged(mock_input_api,
mock_output_api)
self.assertEqual(len(msgs), 0)
class CheckInlineConstexprDefinitionsInHeadersTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testNoInlineConstexprInHeaderFile(self):
"""Tests that non-inlined constexpr variables in headers fail the test."""
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('src/constants.h',
['constexpr int kVersion = 5;'])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckInlineConstexprDefinitionsInHeaders(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
def testNoInlineConstexprInHeaderFileInitializedFromFunction(self):
"""Tests that non-inlined constexpr header variables that are initialized from a function fail."""
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('src/constants.h',
['constexpr int kVersion = GetVersion();'])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckInlineConstexprDefinitionsInHeaders(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
def testNoInlineConstexprInHeaderFileInitializedWithExpression(self):
"""Tests that non-inlined constexpr header variables initialized with an expression fail."""
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('src/constants.h',
['constexpr int kVersion = (4 + 5)*3;'])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckInlineConstexprDefinitionsInHeaders(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
def testNoInlineConstexprInHeaderFileBraceInitialized(self):
"""Tests that non-inlined constexpr header variables that are brace-initialized fail."""
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('src/constants.h', ['constexpr int kVersion{5};'])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckInlineConstexprDefinitionsInHeaders(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
def testNoInlineConstexprInHeaderWithAttribute(self):
"""Tests that non-inlined constexpr header variables that have compiler attributes fail."""
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('src/constants.h',
['constexpr [[maybe_unused]] int kVersion{5};'])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckInlineConstexprDefinitionsInHeaders(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
def testInlineConstexprInHeaderWithAttribute(self):
"""Tests that inlined constexpr header variables that have compiler attributes pass."""
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
'src/constants.h',
['inline constexpr [[maybe_unused]] int kVersion{5};']),
MockAffectedFile(
'src/constants.h',
['constexpr inline [[maybe_unused]] int kVersion{5};']),
MockAffectedFile(
'src/constants.h',
['inline constexpr [[maybe_unused]] inline int kVersion{5};'])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckInlineConstexprDefinitionsInHeaders(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testNoInlineConstexprInHeaderFileMultipleLines(self):
"""Tests that non-inlined constexpr header variable definitions spanning multiple lines fail."""
input_api = MockInputApi()
lines = [
'constexpr char kLongName =',
' "This is a very long name of something.";'
]
input_api.files = [MockAffectedFile('src/constants.h', lines)]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckInlineConstexprDefinitionsInHeaders(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
def testNoInlineConstexprInCCFile(self):
"""Tests that non-inlined constexpr variables in .cc files pass the test."""
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('src/implementation.cc',
['constexpr int kVersion = 5;'])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckInlineConstexprDefinitionsInHeaders(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testInlineConstexprInHeaderFile(self):
"""Tests that inlined constexpr variables in header files pass the test."""
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('src/constants.h',
['constexpr inline int kX = 5;']),
MockAffectedFile('src/version.h',
['inline constexpr float kY = 5.0f;'])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckInlineConstexprDefinitionsInHeaders(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testConstexprStandaloneFunctionInHeaderFile(self):
"""Tests that non-inlined constexpr functions in headers pass the test."""
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('src/helpers.h', ['constexpr int GetVersion();'])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckInlineConstexprDefinitionsInHeaders(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testConstexprWithAbseilAttributeInHeader(self):
"""Tests that non-inlined constexpr variables with Abseil-type prefixes in headers fail."""
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('src/helpers.h',
['ABSL_FOOFOO constexpr int i = 5;'])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckInlineConstexprDefinitionsInHeaders(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
def testInlineConstexprWithAbseilAttributeInHeader(self):
"""Tests that inlined constexpr variables with Abseil-type prefixes in headers pass."""
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('src/helpers.h',
['constexpr ABSL_FOO inline int i = 5;'])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckInlineConstexprDefinitionsInHeaders(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testConstexprWithClangAttributeInHeader(self):
"""Tests that non-inlined constexpr variables with attributes with colons in headers fail."""
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('src/helpers.h',
['[[clang::someattribute]] constexpr int i = 5;'])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckInlineConstexprDefinitionsInHeaders(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
def testInlineConstexprWithClangAttributeInHeader(self):
"""Tests that inlined constexpr variables with attributes with colons in headers pass."""
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile(
'src/helpers.h',
['constexpr [[clang::someattribute]] inline int i = 5;'])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckInlineConstexprDefinitionsInHeaders(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testNoExplicitInlineConstexprInsideClassInHeaderFile(self):
"""Tests that non-inlined constexpr class members pass the test."""
input_api = MockInputApi()
lines = [
'class SomeClass {', ' public:',
' static constexpr kVersion = 5;', '};'
]
input_api.files = [MockAffectedFile('src/class.h', lines)]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckInlineConstexprDefinitionsInHeaders(
input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
def testTodoBugReferencesWithOldBugId(self):
"""Tests that an old monorail bug ID in a TODO fails."""
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('src/helpers.h', ['// TODO(crbug.com/12345)'])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckTodoBugReferences(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(warnings))
def testTodoBugReferencesWithUpdatedBugId(self):
"""Tests that a new issue tracker bug ID in a TODO passes."""
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockAffectedFile('src/helpers.h', ['// TODO(crbug.com/40781525)'])
]
warnings = PRESUBMIT.CheckTodoBugReferences(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(warnings))
class CheckDeprecatedSyncConsentFunctionsTest(unittest.TestCase):
"""Test the presubmit for deprecated ConsentLevel::kSync functions."""
def testCppMobilePlatformPath(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('chrome/browser/android/file.cc', ['OtherFunction']),
MockFile('chrome/android/file.cc', ['HasSyncConsent']),
MockFile('ios/file.mm', ['CanSyncFeatureStart']),
MockFile('components/foo/ios/file.cc', ['IsSyncFeatureEnabled']),
MockFile('components/foo/delegate_android.cc',
['IsSyncFeatureActive']),
MockFile('components/foo/delegate_ios.cc',
['IsSyncFeatureActive']),
MockFile('components/foo/android_delegate.cc',
['IsSyncFeatureActive']),
MockFile('components/foo/ios_delegate.cc',
['IsSyncFeatureActive']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoBannedPatterns(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(7, len(results))
self.assertTrue(
all('chrome/browser/android/file.cc' not in r.message
for r in results))
self.assertTrue('chrome/android/file.cc' in results[0].message),
self.assertTrue('ios/file.mm' in results[1].message),
self.assertTrue('components/foo/ios/file.cc' in results[2].message),
self.assertTrue(
'components/foo/delegate_android.cc' in results[3].message),
self.assertTrue(
'components/foo/delegate_ios.cc' in results[4].message),
self.assertTrue(
'components/foo/android_delegate.cc' in results[5].message),
self.assertTrue(
'components/foo/ios_delegate.cc' in results[6].message),
def testCppNonMobilePlatformPath(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('chrome/browser/file.cc', ['HasSyncConsent']),
MockFile('bios/file.cc', ['HasSyncConsent']),
MockFile('components/kiosk/file.cc', ['HasSyncConsent']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoBannedPatterns(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(0, len(results))
def testJavaPath(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('components/foo/file1.java', ['otherFunction']),
MockFile('components/foo/file2.java', ['hasSyncConsent']),
MockFile('chrome/foo/file3.java', ['canSyncFeatureStart']),
MockFile('chrome/foo/file4.java', ['isSyncFeatureEnabled']),
MockFile('chrome/foo/file5.java', ['isSyncFeatureActive']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoBannedPatterns(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(4, len(results))
self.assertTrue(
all('components/foo/file1.java' not in r.message for r in results))
self.assertTrue('components/foo/file2.java' in results[0].message),
self.assertTrue('chrome/foo/file3.java' in results[1].message),
self.assertTrue('chrome/foo/file4.java' in results[2].message),
self.assertTrue('chrome/foo/file5.java' in results[3].message),
class CheckAnonymousNamespaceTest(unittest.TestCase):
"""Test the presubmit for anonymous namespaces."""
def testAnonymousNamespace(self):
input_api = MockInputApi()
input_api.files = [
MockFile('chrome/test.h', ['namespace {']),
MockFile('chrome/test.cc', ['namespace {']),
MockFile('chrome/test.java', ['namespace {']),
MockFile('chrome/test.cpp', ['namespace {']),
MockFile('chrome/test.txt', ['namespace {']),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckNoBannedPatterns(input_api, MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertTrue('chrome/test.h' in results[0].message),
self.assertFalse('chrome/test.cc' in results[0].message),
self.assertFalse('chrome/test.java' in results[0].message),
self.assertFalse('chrome/test.cpp' in results[0].message),
self.assertFalse('chrome/test.txt' in results[0].message),
class CheckBaseFeatureMacroTest(unittest.TestCase):
def testBaseFeatureMacro(self):
mock_input_api = MockInputApi()
mock_input_api.files = [
# #################################################################
# Valid cases (no warnings)
# #################################################################
MockAffectedFile(
'valid1.cc',
['BASE_FEATURE(kMyToggle, base::FEATURE_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT);'
]),
MockAffectedFile('valid_multiline.cc', [
'BASE_FEATURE(kMyMultilineToggle,',
' base::FEATURE_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT);'
]),
MockAffectedFile(
'valid_complex_arg.cc',
['BASE_FEATURE(kMyToggle, GetDefaultState(vector<int>(1)));']),
MockAffectedFile('valid_comment.cc', [
'// BASE_FEATURE(invalidToggle, '
'base::FEATURE_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT);'
]),
MockAffectedFile('valid_3param_comment.cc', [
'// BASE_FEATURE(kMyToggle, "MyToggle", '
'base::FEATURE_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT);'
]),
# #################################################################
# Cases that should produce warnings.
# #################################################################
MockAffectedFile('warning_3param.cc', [
'BASE_FEATURE(kMyToggle, "MyToggle", '
'base::FEATURE_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT);'
]),
MockAffectedFile(
'warning_no_k.cc',
['BASE_FEATURE(MyToggle, base::FEATURE_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT);']),
MockAffectedFile(
'warning_lowercase_after_k.cc',
['BASE_FEATURE(kmyToggle, base::FEATURE_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT);'
]),
MockAffectedFile('warning_3param_multiline.cc', [
'BASE_FEATURE(kMyToggle,', ' "MyToggle",',
' base::FEATURE_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT);'
]),
]
results = PRESUBMIT.CheckBaseFeatureMacro(mock_input_api,
MockOutputApi())
self.assertEqual(1, len(results))
self.assertEqual('warning', results[0].type)
self.assertEqual('BASE_FEATURE() macro naming:', results[0].message)
warnings = results[0].items
expected_warnings = [
' warning_3param.cc:1: The 3-argument BASE_FEATURE macro with a '
'string literal is discouraged. Use the 2-argument version '
'instead.',
' warning_3param_multiline.cc:1: The 3-argument BASE_FEATURE '
'macro with a string literal is discouraged. Use the 2-argument '
'version instead.',
' warning_no_k.cc:1: Feature identifier "MyToggle" should start '
'with "k" followed by an uppercase letter.',
' warning_lowercase_after_k.cc:1: Feature identifier "kmyToggle"'
' should start with "k" followed by an uppercase letter.',
]
self.assertEqual(len(expected_warnings), len(warnings))
self.assertEqual(sorted(expected_warnings), sorted(warnings))
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()