| .. _execmodel: | |
| *************** | |
| Execution model | |
| *************** | |
| .. index:: | |
| single: execution model | |
| pair: code; block | |
| .. _prog_structure: | |
| Structure of a program | |
| ====================== | |
| .. index:: block | |
| A Python program is constructed from code blocks. | |
| A :dfn:`block` is a piece of Python program text that is executed as a unit. | |
| The following are blocks: a module, a function body, and a class definition. | |
| Each command typed interactively is a block. A script file (a file given as | |
| standard input to the interpreter or specified as a command line argument to the | |
| interpreter) is a code block. A script command (a command specified on the | |
| interpreter command line with the :option:`-c` option) is a code block. | |
| A module run as a top level script (as module ``__main__``) from the command | |
| line using a :option:`-m` argument is also a code block. The string | |
| argument passed to the built-in functions :func:`eval` and :func:`exec` is a | |
| code block. | |
| .. index:: pair: execution; frame | |
| A code block is executed in an :dfn:`execution frame`. A frame contains some | |
| administrative information (used for debugging) and determines where and how | |
| execution continues after the code block's execution has completed. | |
| .. _naming: | |
| Naming and binding | |
| ================== | |
| .. index:: | |
| single: namespace | |
| single: scope | |
| .. _bind_names: | |
| Binding of names | |
| ---------------- | |
| .. index:: | |
| single: name | |
| pair: binding; name | |
| :dfn:`Names` refer to objects. Names are introduced by name binding operations. | |
| .. index:: single: from; import statement | |
| The following constructs bind names: | |
| * formal parameters to functions, | |
| * class definitions, | |
| * function definitions, | |
| * assignment expressions, | |
| * :ref:`targets <assignment>` that are identifiers if occurring in | |
| an assignment: | |
| + :keyword:`for` loop header, | |
| + after :keyword:`!as` in a :keyword:`with` statement, :keyword:`except` | |
| clause, :keyword:`except* <except_star>` clause, or in the as-pattern in structural pattern matching, | |
| + in a capture pattern in structural pattern matching | |
| * :keyword:`import` statements. | |
| * :keyword:`type` statements. | |
| * :ref:`type parameter lists <type-params>`. | |
| The :keyword:`!import` statement of the form ``from ... import *`` binds all | |
| names defined in the imported module, except those beginning with an underscore. | |
| This form may only be used at the module level. | |
| A target occurring in a :keyword:`del` statement is also considered bound for | |
| this purpose (though the actual semantics are to unbind the name). | |
| Each assignment or import statement occurs within a block defined by a class or | |
| function definition or at the module level (the top-level code block). | |
| .. index:: pair: free; variable | |
| If a name is bound in a block, it is a local variable of that block, unless | |
| declared as :keyword:`nonlocal` or :keyword:`global`. If a name is bound at | |
| the module level, it is a global variable. (The variables of the module code | |
| block are local and global.) If a variable is used in a code block but not | |
| defined there, it is a :term:`free variable`. | |
| Each occurrence of a name in the program text refers to the :dfn:`binding` of | |
| that name established by the following name resolution rules. | |
| .. _resolve_names: | |
| Resolution of names | |
| ------------------- | |
| .. index:: scope | |
| A :dfn:`scope` defines the visibility of a name within a block. If a local | |
| variable is defined in a block, its scope includes that block. If the | |
| definition occurs in a function block, the scope extends to any blocks contained | |
| within the defining one, unless a contained block introduces a different binding | |
| for the name. | |
| .. index:: single: environment | |
| When a name is used in a code block, it is resolved using the nearest enclosing | |
| scope. The set of all such scopes visible to a code block is called the block's | |
| :dfn:`environment`. | |
| .. index:: | |
| single: NameError (built-in exception) | |
| single: UnboundLocalError | |
| When a name is not found at all, a :exc:`NameError` exception is raised. | |
| If the current scope is a function scope, and the name refers to a local | |
| variable that has not yet been bound to a value at the point where the name is | |
| used, an :exc:`UnboundLocalError` exception is raised. | |
| :exc:`UnboundLocalError` is a subclass of :exc:`NameError`. | |
| If a name binding operation occurs anywhere within a code block, all uses of the | |
| name within the block are treated as references to the current block. This can | |
| lead to errors when a name is used within a block before it is bound. This rule | |
| is subtle. Python lacks declarations and allows name binding operations to | |
| occur anywhere within a code block. The local variables of a code block can be | |
| determined by scanning the entire text of the block for name binding operations. | |
| See :ref:`the FAQ entry on UnboundLocalError <faq-unboundlocalerror>` | |
| for examples. | |
| If the :keyword:`global` statement occurs within a block, all uses of the names | |
| specified in the statement refer to the bindings of those names in the top-level | |
| namespace. Names are resolved in the top-level namespace by searching the | |
| global namespace, i.e. the namespace of the module containing the code block, | |
| and the builtins namespace, the namespace of the module :mod:`builtins`. The | |
| global namespace is searched first. If the names are not found there, the | |
| builtins namespace is searched next. If the names are also not found in the | |
| builtins namespace, new variables are created in the global namespace. | |
| The global statement must precede all uses of the listed names. | |
| The :keyword:`global` statement has the same scope as a name binding operation | |
| in the same block. If the nearest enclosing scope for a free variable contains | |
| a global statement, the free variable is treated as a global. | |
| .. XXX say more about "nonlocal" semantics here | |
| The :keyword:`nonlocal` statement causes corresponding names to refer | |
| to previously bound variables in the nearest enclosing function scope. | |
| :exc:`SyntaxError` is raised at compile time if the given name does not | |
| exist in any enclosing function scope. :ref:`Type parameters <type-params>` | |
| cannot be rebound with the :keyword:`!nonlocal` statement. | |
| .. index:: pair: module; __main__ | |
| The namespace for a module is automatically created the first time a module is | |
| imported. The main module for a script is always called :mod:`__main__`. | |
| Class definition blocks and arguments to :func:`exec` and :func:`eval` are | |
| special in the context of name resolution. | |
| A class definition is an executable statement that may use and define names. | |
| These references follow the normal rules for name resolution with an exception | |
| that unbound local variables are looked up in the global namespace. | |
| The namespace of the class definition becomes the attribute dictionary of | |
| the class. The scope of names defined in a class block is limited to the | |
| class block; it does not extend to the code blocks of methods. This includes | |
| comprehensions and generator expressions, but it does not include | |
| :ref:`annotation scopes <annotation-scopes>`, | |
| which have access to their enclosing class scopes. | |
| This means that the following will fail:: | |
| class A: | |
| a = 42 | |
| b = list(a + i for i in range(10)) | |
| However, the following will succeed:: | |
| class A: | |
| type Alias = Nested | |
| class Nested: pass | |
| print(A.Alias.__value__) # <type 'A.Nested'> | |
| .. _annotation-scopes: | |
| Annotation scopes | |
| ----------------- | |
| :term:`Annotations <annotation>`, :ref:`type parameter lists <type-params>` | |
| and :keyword:`type` statements | |
| introduce *annotation scopes*, which behave mostly like function scopes, | |
| but with some exceptions discussed below. | |
| Annotation scopes are used in the following contexts: | |
| * :term:`Function annotations <function annotation>`. | |
| * :term:`Variable annotations <variable annotation>`. | |
| * Type parameter lists for :ref:`generic type aliases <generic-type-aliases>`. | |
| * Type parameter lists for :ref:`generic functions <generic-functions>`. | |
| A generic function's annotations are | |
| executed within the annotation scope, but its defaults and decorators are not. | |
| * Type parameter lists for :ref:`generic classes <generic-classes>`. | |
| A generic class's base classes and | |
| keyword arguments are executed within the annotation scope, but its decorators are not. | |
| * The bounds, constraints, and default values for type parameters | |
| (:ref:`lazily evaluated <lazy-evaluation>`). | |
| * The value of type aliases (:ref:`lazily evaluated <lazy-evaluation>`). | |
| Annotation scopes differ from function scopes in the following ways: | |
| * Annotation scopes have access to their enclosing class namespace. | |
| If an annotation scope is immediately within a class scope, or within another | |
| annotation scope that is immediately within a class scope, the code in the | |
| annotation scope can use names defined in the class scope as if it were | |
| executed directly within the class body. This contrasts with regular | |
| functions defined within classes, which cannot access names defined in the class scope. | |
| * Expressions in annotation scopes cannot contain :keyword:`yield`, ``yield from``, | |
| :keyword:`await`, or :token:`:= <python-grammar:assignment_expression>` | |
| expressions. (These expressions are allowed in other scopes contained within the | |
| annotation scope.) | |
| * Names defined in annotation scopes cannot be rebound with :keyword:`nonlocal` | |
| statements in inner scopes. This includes only type parameters, as no other | |
| syntactic elements that can appear within annotation scopes can introduce new names. | |
| * While annotation scopes have an internal name, that name is not reflected in the | |
| :term:`qualified name` of objects defined within the scope. | |
| Instead, the :attr:`~definition.__qualname__` | |
| of such objects is as if the object were defined in the enclosing scope. | |
| .. versionadded:: 3.12 | |
| Annotation scopes were introduced in Python 3.12 as part of :pep:`695`. | |
| .. versionchanged:: 3.13 | |
| Annotation scopes are also used for type parameter defaults, as | |
| introduced by :pep:`696`. | |
| .. versionchanged:: 3.14 | |
| Annotation scopes are now also used for annotations, as specified in | |
| :pep:`649` and :pep:`749`. | |
| .. _lazy-evaluation: | |
| Lazy evaluation | |
| --------------- | |
| Most annotation scopes are *lazily evaluated*. This includes annotations, | |
| the values of type aliases created through the :keyword:`type` statement, and | |
| the bounds, constraints, and default values of type | |
| variables created through the :ref:`type parameter syntax <type-params>`. | |
| This means that they are not evaluated when the type alias or type variable is | |
| created, or when the object carrying annotations is created. Instead, they | |
| are only evaluated when necessary, for example when the ``__value__`` | |
| attribute on a type alias is accessed. | |
| Example: | |
| .. doctest:: | |
| >>> type Alias = 1/0 | |
| >>> Alias.__value__ | |
| Traceback (most recent call last): | |
| ... | |
| ZeroDivisionError: division by zero | |
| >>> def func[T: 1/0](): pass | |
| >>> T = func.__type_params__[0] | |
| >>> T.__bound__ | |
| Traceback (most recent call last): | |
| ... | |
| ZeroDivisionError: division by zero | |
| Here the exception is raised only when the ``__value__`` attribute | |
| of the type alias or the ``__bound__`` attribute of the type variable | |
| is accessed. | |
| This behavior is primarily useful for references to types that have not | |
| yet been defined when the type alias or type variable is created. For example, | |
| lazy evaluation enables creation of mutually recursive type aliases:: | |
| from typing import Literal | |
| type SimpleExpr = int | Parenthesized | |
| type Parenthesized = tuple[Literal["("], Expr, Literal[")"]] | |
| type Expr = SimpleExpr | tuple[SimpleExpr, Literal["+", "-"], Expr] | |
| Lazily evaluated values are evaluated in :ref:`annotation scope <annotation-scopes>`, | |
| which means that names that appear inside the lazily evaluated value are looked up | |
| as if they were used in the immediately enclosing scope. | |
| .. versionadded:: 3.12 | |
| .. _restrict_exec: | |
| Builtins and restricted execution | |
| --------------------------------- | |
| .. index:: pair: restricted; execution | |
| .. impl-detail:: | |
| Users should not touch ``__builtins__``; it is strictly an implementation | |
| detail. Users wanting to override values in the builtins namespace should | |
| :keyword:`import` the :mod:`builtins` module and modify its | |
| attributes appropriately. | |
| The builtins namespace associated with the execution of a code block | |
| is actually found by looking up the name ``__builtins__`` in its | |
| global namespace; this should be a dictionary or a module (in the | |
| latter case the module's dictionary is used). By default, when in the | |
| :mod:`__main__` module, ``__builtins__`` is the built-in module | |
| :mod:`builtins`; when in any other module, ``__builtins__`` is an | |
| alias for the dictionary of the :mod:`builtins` module itself. | |
| .. _dynamic-features: | |
| Interaction with dynamic features | |
| --------------------------------- | |
| Name resolution of free variables occurs at runtime, not at compile time. | |
| This means that the following code will print 42:: | |
| i = 10 | |
| def f(): | |
| print(i) | |
| i = 42 | |
| f() | |
| .. XXX from * also invalid with relative imports (at least currently) | |
| The :func:`eval` and :func:`exec` functions do not have access to the full | |
| environment for resolving names. Names may be resolved in the local and global | |
| namespaces of the caller. Free variables are not resolved in the nearest | |
| enclosing namespace, but in the global namespace. [#]_ The :func:`exec` and | |
| :func:`eval` functions have optional arguments to override the global and local | |
| namespace. If only one namespace is specified, it is used for both. | |
| .. XXX(ncoghlan) above is only accurate for string execution. When executing code objects, | |
| closure cells may now be passed explicitly to resolve co_freevars references. | |
| Docs issue: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/122826 | |
| .. _exceptions: | |
| Exceptions | |
| ========== | |
| .. index:: single: exception | |
| .. index:: | |
| single: raise an exception | |
| single: handle an exception | |
| single: exception handler | |
| single: errors | |
| single: error handling | |
| Exceptions are a means of breaking out of the normal flow of control of a code | |
| block in order to handle errors or other exceptional conditions. An exception | |
| is *raised* at the point where the error is detected; it may be *handled* by the | |
| surrounding code block or by any code block that directly or indirectly invoked | |
| the code block where the error occurred. | |
| The Python interpreter raises an exception when it detects a run-time error | |
| (such as division by zero). A Python program can also explicitly raise an | |
| exception with the :keyword:`raise` statement. Exception handlers are specified | |
| with the :keyword:`try` ... :keyword:`except` statement. The :keyword:`finally` | |
| clause of such a statement can be used to specify cleanup code which does not | |
| handle the exception, but is executed whether an exception occurred or not in | |
| the preceding code. | |
| .. index:: single: termination model | |
| Python uses the "termination" model of error handling: an exception handler can | |
| find out what happened and continue execution at an outer level, but it cannot | |
| repair the cause of the error and retry the failing operation (except by | |
| re-entering the offending piece of code from the top). | |
| .. index:: single: SystemExit (built-in exception) | |
| When an exception is not handled at all, the interpreter terminates execution of | |
| the program, or returns to its interactive main loop. In either case, it prints | |
| a stack traceback, except when the exception is :exc:`SystemExit`. | |
| Exceptions are identified by class instances. The :keyword:`except` clause is | |
| selected depending on the class of the instance: it must reference the class of | |
| the instance or a :term:`non-virtual base class <abstract base class>` thereof. | |
| The instance can be received by the handler and can carry additional information | |
| about the exceptional condition. | |
| .. note:: | |
| Exception messages are not part of the Python API. Their contents may change | |
| from one version of Python to the next without warning and should not be | |
| relied on by code which will run under multiple versions of the interpreter. | |
| See also the description of the :keyword:`try` statement in section :ref:`try` | |
| and :keyword:`raise` statement in section :ref:`raise`. | |
| .. _execcomponents: | |
| Runtime Components | |
| ================== | |
| General Computing Model | |
| ----------------------- | |
| Python's execution model does not operate in a vacuum. It runs on | |
| a host machine and through that host's runtime environment, including | |
| its operating system (OS), if there is one. When a program runs, | |
| the conceptual layers of how it runs on the host look something | |
| like this: | |
| | **host machine** | |
| | **process** (global resources) | |
| | **thread** (runs machine code) | |
| Each process represents a program running on the host. Think of each | |
| process itself as the data part of its program. Think of the process' | |
| threads as the execution part of the program. This distinction will | |
| be important to understand the conceptual Python runtime. | |
| The process, as the data part, is the execution context in which the | |
| program runs. It mostly consists of the set of resources assigned to | |
| the program by the host, including memory, signals, file handles, | |
| sockets, and environment variables. | |
| Processes are isolated and independent from one another. (The same | |
| is true for hosts.) The host manages the process' access to its | |
| assigned resources, in addition to coordinating between processes. | |
| Each thread represents the actual execution of the program's machine | |
| code, running relative to the resources assigned to the program's | |
| process. It's strictly up to the host how and when that execution | |
| takes place. | |
| From the point of view of Python, a program always starts with exactly | |
| one thread. However, the program may grow to run in multiple | |
| simultaneous threads. Not all hosts support multiple threads per | |
| process, but most do. Unlike processes, threads in a process are not | |
| isolated and independent from one another. Specifically, all threads | |
| in a process share all of the process' resources. | |
| The fundamental point of threads is that each one does *run* | |
| independently, at the same time as the others. That may be only | |
| conceptually at the same time ("concurrently") or physically | |
| ("in parallel"). Either way, the threads effectively run | |
| at a non-synchronized rate. | |
| .. note:: | |
| That non-synchronized rate means none of the process' memory is | |
| guaranteed to stay consistent for the code running in any given | |
| thread. Thus multi-threaded programs must take care to coordinate | |
| access to intentionally shared resources. Likewise, they must take | |
| care to be absolutely diligent about not accessing any *other* | |
| resources in multiple threads; otherwise two threads running at the | |
| same time might accidentally interfere with each other's use of some | |
| shared data. All this is true for both Python programs and the | |
| Python runtime. | |
| The cost of this broad, unstructured requirement is the tradeoff for | |
| the kind of raw concurrency that threads provide. The alternative | |
| to the required discipline generally means dealing with | |
| non-deterministic bugs and data corruption. | |
| Python Runtime Model | |
| -------------------- | |
| The same conceptual layers apply to each Python program, with some | |
| extra data layers specific to Python: | |
| | **host machine** | |
| | **process** (global resources) | |
| | Python global runtime (*state*) | |
| | Python interpreter (*state*) | |
| | **thread** (runs Python bytecode and "C-API") | |
| | Python thread *state* | |
| At the conceptual level: when a Python program starts, it looks exactly | |
| like that diagram, with one of each. The runtime may grow to include | |
| multiple interpreters, and each interpreter may grow to include | |
| multiple thread states. | |
| .. note:: | |
| A Python implementation won't necessarily implement the runtime | |
| layers distinctly or even concretely. The only exception is places | |
| where distinct layers are directly specified or exposed to users, | |
| like through the :mod:`threading` module. | |
| .. note:: | |
| The initial interpreter is typically called the "main" interpreter. | |
| Some Python implementations, like CPython, assign special roles | |
| to the main interpreter. | |
| Likewise, the host thread where the runtime was initialized is known | |
| as the "main" thread. It may be different from the process' initial | |
| thread, though they are often the same. In some cases "main thread" | |
| may be even more specific and refer to the initial thread state. | |
| A Python runtime might assign specific responsibilities | |
| to the main thread, such as handling signals. | |
| As a whole, the Python runtime consists of the global runtime state, | |
| interpreters, and thread states. The runtime ensures all that state | |
| stays consistent over its lifetime, particularly when used with | |
| multiple host threads. | |
| The global runtime, at the conceptual level, is just a set of | |
| interpreters. While those interpreters are otherwise isolated and | |
| independent from one another, they may share some data or other | |
| resources. The runtime is responsible for managing these global | |
| resources safely. The actual nature and management of these resources | |
| is implementation-specific. Ultimately, the external utility of the | |
| global runtime is limited to managing interpreters. | |
| In contrast, an "interpreter" is conceptually what we would normally | |
| think of as the (full-featured) "Python runtime". When machine code | |
| executing in a host thread interacts with the Python runtime, it calls | |
| into Python in the context of a specific interpreter. | |
| .. note:: | |
| The term "interpreter" here is not the same as the "bytecode | |
| interpreter", which is what regularly runs in threads, executing | |
| compiled Python code. | |
| In an ideal world, "Python runtime" would refer to what we currently | |
| call "interpreter". However, it's been called "interpreter" at least | |
| since introduced in 1997 (`CPython:a027efa5b`_). | |
| .. _CPython:a027efa5b: https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/a027efa5b | |
| Each interpreter completely encapsulates all of the non-process-global, | |
| non-thread-specific state needed for the Python runtime to work. | |
| Notably, the interpreter's state persists between uses. It includes | |
| fundamental data like :data:`sys.modules`. The runtime ensures | |
| multiple threads using the same interpreter will safely | |
| share it between them. | |
| A Python implementation may support using multiple interpreters at the | |
| same time in the same process. They are independent and isolated from | |
| one another. For example, each interpreter has its own | |
| :data:`sys.modules`. | |
| For thread-specific runtime state, each interpreter has a set of thread | |
| states, which it manages, in the same way the global runtime contains | |
| a set of interpreters. It can have thread states for as many host | |
| threads as it needs. It may even have multiple thread states for | |
| the same host thread, though that isn't as common. | |
| Each thread state, conceptually, has all the thread-specific runtime | |
| data an interpreter needs to operate in one host thread. The thread | |
| state includes the current raised exception and the thread's Python | |
| call stack. It may include other thread-specific resources. | |
| .. note:: | |
| The term "Python thread" can sometimes refer to a thread state, but | |
| normally it means a thread created using the :mod:`threading` module. | |
| Each thread state, over its lifetime, is always tied to exactly one | |
| interpreter and exactly one host thread. It will only ever be used in | |
| that thread and with that interpreter. | |
| Multiple thread states may be tied to the same host thread, whether for | |
| different interpreters or even the same interpreter. However, for any | |
| given host thread, only one of the thread states tied to it can be used | |
| by the thread at a time. | |
| Thread states are isolated and independent from one another and don't | |
| share any data, except for possibly sharing an interpreter and objects | |
| or other resources belonging to that interpreter. | |
| Once a program is running, new Python threads can be created using the | |
| :mod:`threading` module (on platforms and Python implementations that | |
| support threads). Additional processes can be created using the | |
| :mod:`os`, :mod:`subprocess`, and :mod:`multiprocessing` modules. | |
| Interpreters can be created and used with the | |
| :mod:`~concurrent.interpreters` module. Coroutines (async) can | |
| be run using :mod:`asyncio` in each interpreter, typically only | |
| in a single thread (often the main thread). | |
| .. rubric:: Footnotes | |
| .. [#] This limitation occurs because the code that is executed by these operations | |
| is not available at the time the module is compiled. |