| .. highlight:: c | |
| .. _embedding: | |
| *************************************** | |
| Embedding Python in Another Application | |
| *************************************** | |
| The previous chapters discussed how to extend Python, that is, how to extend the | |
| functionality of Python by attaching a library of C functions to it. It is also | |
| possible to do it the other way around: enrich your C/C++ application by | |
| embedding Python in it. Embedding provides your application with the ability to | |
| implement some of the functionality of your application in Python rather than C | |
| or C++. This can be used for many purposes; one example would be to allow users | |
| to tailor the application to their needs by writing some scripts in Python. You | |
| can also use it yourself if some of the functionality can be written in Python | |
| more easily. | |
| Embedding Python is similar to extending it, but not quite. The difference is | |
| that when you extend Python, the main program of the application is still the | |
| Python interpreter, while if you embed Python, the main program may have nothing | |
| to do with Python --- instead, some parts of the application occasionally call | |
| the Python interpreter to run some Python code. | |
| So if you are embedding Python, you are providing your own main program. One of | |
| the things this main program has to do is initialize the Python interpreter. At | |
| the very least, you have to call the function :c:func:`Py_Initialize`. There are | |
| optional calls to pass command line arguments to Python. Then later you can | |
| call the interpreter from any part of the application. | |
| There are several different ways to call the interpreter: you can pass a string | |
| containing Python statements to :c:func:`PyRun_SimpleString`, or you can pass a | |
| stdio file pointer and a file name (for identification in error messages only) | |
| to :c:func:`PyRun_SimpleFile`. You can also call the lower-level operations | |
| described in the previous chapters to construct and use Python objects. | |
| .. seealso:: | |
| :ref:`c-api-index` | |
| The details of Python's C interface are given in this manual. A great deal of | |
| necessary information can be found here. | |
| .. _high-level-embedding: | |
| Very High Level Embedding | |
| ========================= | |
| The simplest form of embedding Python is the use of the very high level | |
| interface. This interface is intended to execute a Python script without needing | |
| to interact with the application directly. This can for example be used to | |
| perform some operation on a file. :: | |
| #define PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN | |
| #include <Python.h> | |
| int | |
| main(int argc, char *argv[]) | |
| { | |
| PyStatus status; | |
| PyConfig config; | |
| PyConfig_InitPythonConfig(&config); | |
| /* optional but recommended */ | |
| status = PyConfig_SetBytesString(&config, &config.program_name, argv[0]); | |
| if (PyStatus_Exception(status)) { | |
| goto exception; | |
| } | |
| status = Py_InitializeFromConfig(&config); | |
| if (PyStatus_Exception(status)) { | |
| goto exception; | |
| } | |
| PyConfig_Clear(&config); | |
| PyRun_SimpleString("from time import time,ctime\n" | |
| "print('Today is', ctime(time()))\n"); | |
| if (Py_FinalizeEx() < 0) { | |
| exit(120); | |
| } | |
| return 0; | |
| exception: | |
| PyConfig_Clear(&config); | |
| Py_ExitStatusException(status); | |
| } | |
| .. note:: | |
| ``#define PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN`` was used to indicate that ``Py_ssize_t`` should be | |
| used in some APIs instead of ``int``. | |
| It is not necessary since Python 3.13, but we keep it here for backward compatibility. | |
| See :ref:`arg-parsing-string-and-buffers` for a description of this macro. | |
| Setting :c:member:`PyConfig.program_name` should be called before | |
| :c:func:`Py_InitializeFromConfig` to inform the interpreter about paths to Python run-time | |
| libraries. Next, the Python interpreter is initialized with | |
| :c:func:`Py_Initialize`, followed by the execution of a hard-coded Python script | |
| that prints the date and time. Afterwards, the :c:func:`Py_FinalizeEx` call shuts | |
| the interpreter down, followed by the end of the program. In a real program, | |
| you may want to get the Python script from another source, perhaps a text-editor | |
| routine, a file, or a database. Getting the Python code from a file can better | |
| be done by using the :c:func:`PyRun_SimpleFile` function, which saves you the | |
| trouble of allocating memory space and loading the file contents. | |
| .. _lower-level-embedding: | |
| Beyond Very High Level Embedding: An overview | |
| ============================================= | |
| The high level interface gives you the ability to execute arbitrary pieces of | |
| Python code from your application, but exchanging data values is quite | |
| cumbersome to say the least. If you want that, you should use lower level calls. | |
| At the cost of having to write more C code, you can achieve almost anything. | |
| It should be noted that extending Python and embedding Python is quite the same | |
| activity, despite the different intent. Most topics discussed in the previous | |
| chapters are still valid. To show this, consider what the extension code from | |
| Python to C really does: | |
| #. Convert data values from Python to C, | |
| #. Perform a function call to a C routine using the converted values, and | |
| #. Convert the data values from the call from C to Python. | |
| When embedding Python, the interface code does: | |
| #. Convert data values from C to Python, | |
| #. Perform a function call to a Python interface routine using the converted | |
| values, and | |
| #. Convert the data values from the call from Python to C. | |
| As you can see, the data conversion steps are simply swapped to accommodate the | |
| different direction of the cross-language transfer. The only difference is the | |
| routine that you call between both data conversions. When extending, you call a | |
| C routine, when embedding, you call a Python routine. | |
| This chapter will not discuss how to convert data from Python to C and vice | |
| versa. Also, proper use of references and dealing with errors is assumed to be | |
| understood. Since these aspects do not differ from extending the interpreter, | |
| you can refer to earlier chapters for the required information. | |
| .. _pure-embedding: | |
| Pure Embedding | |
| ============== | |
| The first program aims to execute a function in a Python script. Like in the | |
| section about the very high level interface, the Python interpreter does not | |
| directly interact with the application (but that will change in the next | |
| section). | |
| The code to run a function defined in a Python script is: | |
| .. literalinclude:: ../includes/run-func.c | |
| This code loads a Python script using ``argv[1]``, and calls the function named | |
| in ``argv[2]``. Its integer arguments are the other values of the ``argv`` | |
| array. If you :ref:`compile and link <compiling>` this program (let's call | |
| the finished executable :program:`call`), and use it to execute a Python | |
| script, such as: | |
| .. code-block:: python | |
| def multiply(a,b): | |
| print("Will compute", a, "times", b) | |
| c = 0 | |
| for i in range(0, a): | |
| c = c + b | |
| return c | |
| then the result should be: | |
| .. code-block:: shell-session | |
| $ call multiply multiply 3 2 | |
| Will compute 3 times 2 | |
| Result of call: 6 | |
| Although the program is quite large for its functionality, most of the code is | |
| for data conversion between Python and C, and for error reporting. The | |
| interesting part with respect to embedding Python starts with :: | |
| Py_Initialize(); | |
| pName = PyUnicode_DecodeFSDefault(argv[1]); | |
| /* Error checking of pName left out */ | |
| pModule = PyImport_Import(pName); | |
| After initializing the interpreter, the script is loaded using | |
| :c:func:`PyImport_Import`. This routine needs a Python string as its argument, | |
| which is constructed using the :c:func:`PyUnicode_DecodeFSDefault` data | |
| conversion routine. :: | |
| pFunc = PyObject_GetAttrString(pModule, argv[2]); | |
| /* pFunc is a new reference */ | |
| if (pFunc && PyCallable_Check(pFunc)) { | |
| ... | |
| } | |
| Py_XDECREF(pFunc); | |
| Once the script is loaded, the name we're looking for is retrieved using | |
| :c:func:`PyObject_GetAttrString`. If the name exists, and the object returned is | |
| callable, you can safely assume that it is a function. The program then | |
| proceeds by constructing a tuple of arguments as normal. The call to the Python | |
| function is then made with:: | |
| pValue = PyObject_CallObject(pFunc, pArgs); | |
| Upon return of the function, ``pValue`` is either ``NULL`` or it contains a | |
| reference to the return value of the function. Be sure to release the reference | |
| after examining the value. | |
| .. _extending-with-embedding: | |
| Extending Embedded Python | |
| ========================= | |
| Until now, the embedded Python interpreter had no access to functionality from | |
| the application itself. The Python API allows this by extending the embedded | |
| interpreter. That is, the embedded interpreter gets extended with routines | |
| provided by the application. While it sounds complex, it is not so bad. Simply | |
| forget for a while that the application starts the Python interpreter. Instead, | |
| consider the application to be a set of subroutines, and write some glue code | |
| that gives Python access to those routines, just like you would write a normal | |
| Python extension. For example:: | |
| static int numargs=0; | |
| /* Return the number of arguments of the application command line */ | |
| static PyObject* | |
| emb_numargs(PyObject *self, PyObject *args) | |
| { | |
| if(!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, ":numargs")) | |
| return NULL; | |
| return PyLong_FromLong(numargs); | |
| } | |
| static PyMethodDef emb_module_methods[] = { | |
| {"numargs", emb_numargs, METH_VARARGS, | |
| "Return the number of arguments received by the process."}, | |
| {NULL, NULL, 0, NULL} | |
| }; | |
| static struct PyModuleDef emb_module = { | |
| .m_base = PyModuleDef_HEAD_INIT, | |
| .m_name = "emb", | |
| .m_size = 0, | |
| .m_methods = emb_module_methods, | |
| }; | |
| static PyObject* | |
| PyInit_emb(void) | |
| { | |
| return PyModuleDef_Init(&emb_module); | |
| } | |
| Insert the above code just above the :c:func:`main` function. Also, insert the | |
| following two statements before the call to :c:func:`Py_Initialize`:: | |
| numargs = argc; | |
| PyImport_AppendInittab("emb", &PyInit_emb); | |
| These two lines initialize the ``numargs`` variable, and make the | |
| :func:`!emb.numargs` function accessible to the embedded Python interpreter. | |
| With these extensions, the Python script can do things like | |
| .. code-block:: python | |
| import emb | |
| print("Number of arguments", emb.numargs()) | |
| In a real application, the methods will expose an API of the application to | |
| Python. | |
| .. TODO: threads, code examples do not really behave well if errors happen | |
| (what to watch out for) | |
| .. _embeddingincplusplus: | |
| Embedding Python in C++ | |
| ======================= | |
| It is also possible to embed Python in a C++ program; precisely how this is done | |
| will depend on the details of the C++ system used; in general you will need to | |
| write the main program in C++, and use the C++ compiler to compile and link your | |
| program. There is no need to recompile Python itself using C++. | |
| .. _compiling: | |
| Compiling and Linking under Unix-like systems | |
| ============================================= | |
| It is not necessarily trivial to find the right flags to pass to your | |
| compiler (and linker) in order to embed the Python interpreter into your | |
| application, particularly because Python needs to load library modules | |
| implemented as C dynamic extensions (:file:`.so` files) linked against | |
| it. | |
| To find out the required compiler and linker flags, you can execute the | |
| :file:`python{X.Y}-config` script which is generated as part of the | |
| installation process (a :file:`python3-config` script may also be | |
| available). This script has several options, of which the following will | |
| be directly useful to you: | |
| * ``pythonX.Y-config --cflags`` will give you the recommended flags when | |
| compiling: | |
| .. code-block:: shell-session | |
| $ /opt/bin/python3.11-config --cflags | |
| -I/opt/include/python3.11 -I/opt/include/python3.11 -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall | |
| * ``pythonX.Y-config --ldflags --embed`` will give you the recommended flags | |
| when linking: | |
| .. code-block:: shell-session | |
| $ /opt/bin/python3.11-config --ldflags --embed | |
| -L/opt/lib/python3.11/config-3.11-x86_64-linux-gnu -L/opt/lib -lpython3.11 -lpthread -ldl -lutil -lm | |
| .. note:: | |
| To avoid confusion between several Python installations (and especially | |
| between the system Python and your own compiled Python), it is recommended | |
| that you use the absolute path to :file:`python{X.Y}-config`, as in the above | |
| example. | |
| If this procedure doesn't work for you (it is not guaranteed to work for | |
| all Unix-like platforms; however, we welcome :ref:`bug reports <reporting-bugs>`) | |
| you will have to read your system's documentation about dynamic linking and/or | |
| examine Python's :file:`Makefile` (use :func:`sysconfig.get_makefile_filename` | |
| to find its location) and compilation | |
| options. In this case, the :mod:`sysconfig` module is a useful tool to | |
| programmatically extract the configuration values that you will want to | |
| combine together. For example: | |
| .. code-block:: pycon | |
| >>> import sysconfig | |
| >>> sysconfig.get_config_var('LIBS') | |
| '-lpthread -ldl -lutil' | |
| >>> sysconfig.get_config_var('LINKFORSHARED') | |
| '-Xlinker -export-dynamic' | |
| .. XXX similar documentation for Windows missing |